Sandra, While I don't want to be argumentative I do don't believe I agree with your approach if it means a separate list for the Nicholas Knapp line. With all the uncertainty of the early Knapps, and their close geographic proximity, I suspect it is impossible to separate the Nicholas line from the Aaron and other lines with certainty. Certainly, some of those attributed to Aaron probably are not and I suspect some of those you attribute to Nicholas also don't belong there either. I believe it is much better to maintain one web site that covers all the families so that the individual researcher can see what is being discussed and decide for him/her self his interest rather than have to monitor two or more Knapp sites. What do other think? Guy Sandra Owens wrote: > > To the list, > Many thanks for all the kind words, I really appreciate it. > As I was told yesterday, by some kind folks- You can please some of the > people some of the time, etc. I think the point is understood. > Now as for the web-site itself. Many of you have asked what you can do, this > is what I have been receiving- > 1. Personal family files-you link to the Knapp surname > 2. Little items that you have collected about your Knapp's- I have gotten > several interesting pieces of history. > 3. Anything else that may be related to the Nicholas Knapp line-I have also > received information on other Knapp lines as well, that I am archiving for > future use. > > If you would like to contribute in any way, and that means: a family file, > having your name and/or address posted to the e-mail list or home page list, > or anything else you can think of. Please let me know. > > Many thanks again to all, > You have been great! > Sandie > [email protected]