sorry to send this to the list Mary Grace Walker this it it -it bounced again. Ann At 12:38 PM 8/25/98 -0600, you wrote: >The original message was received at Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:38:02 -0600 (MDT) >from pma21.rt66.com [198.59.176.182] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ><milomary@3rddoor.com> > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >... while talking to 3rddoor.com.: >>>> MAIL From:<aestore@rt66.com> SIZE=886 ><<< 551 <aestore@rt66.com>... We don't accept junk mail >554 <milomary@3rddoor.com>... Service unavailable > > ----- Original message follows ----- > >Return-Path: <aestore@rt66.com> >Received: from default (pma21.rt66.com [198.59.176.182]) > by Rt66.com (8.8.8/8.8.6) with SMTP id MAA11715 > for <milomary@3rddoor.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:38:02 -0600 (MDT) >Message-Id: <199808251838.MAA11715@Rt66.com> >X-Sender: aestore@pop.rt66.com >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 >Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 12:36:15 -0600 >To: Walker family <milomary@3rddoor.com> >From: ART STORER <aestore@rt66.com> >Subject: Re: Thanks for the warning >In-Reply-To: <01BDD034.E326F5A0@DIALUP123.3rddoor.com> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >testing-one two three > Ann >At 02:25 PM 8/25/98 -0400, you wrote: >>I called my provider and he said to ask you to send a test message to see >if it will get through. {sounds dumb to me. It didn't get through before >. That's the problem.} Then call him back. >>I suspect it may be a SPAM block they have in place that kicked out the >message because of your name. {STORER} Has this ever happened before. >Will watch for the TEST. >>And Thanks again for going to the trouble of letting me know >>Mary Grace >>Milomary@3rddoor.com >> >