Teresa, if his results come back A-2b you are in the same Kincaid family, however you would need to show a connection to KY to be really closely connected to any of that branch. Your TN connection might indicate a closer connection to 1259 and 51828 as TN was a NC frontier. It is interesting that 51826 was in Campbell Co. TN in 1814 and your Andrew ended up in Cole Co. MO. There was a large group of Campbell Co. residents who migrated to Cole Co. in the 1818-20 time frame. This may be a total coincidence but may also indicate that there was some contact with with the early Cole Co. settlers from Campbell Co. It might be worth exploring a possibility that your Andrew/Martha Miller and 51828's David/Lucy McCormick were brothers or cousins. As a side issue. Your Martha Miller was not the daughter of my James Miller/Elizabeth Kincaid who were a part of that migration from Campbell Co. to Cole Co. and your Andrew was not a member of the same Kincaid family as Elizabeth (her brother Andrew's line is 55675 A-1c). I don't know all of the Miller family related to James so there is a possibility of a connection there but Miller is a very common name. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Teresa Kincaid" <tesscaid@columbus.rr.com> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:47 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Fw: Vetting for Thomas M. Kincaid > This is very interesting because Andrew and Thomas M. are both names used > in > my line. > > Teresa Kincaid > DNA 17719 set A2b >