The only thing that would require another line from James is if the marker 15 (459b) result were to come back as a 10. This is a major variance with the Group A AAV and would need to be investigated. I don't anticipate that happening. I would like to to know which sons130404 and 15550 descend through. Technically if they both descend through the same son, the DNA signature is established for that son. If they descend through different sons, then James Woodburns signature is established. For practical purposes, even if they descend through the same son, we can extrapulate the signiture for James because others whose ancestors have similar birthdates share the same results. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter A. Kincaid" <7kincaid@nb.sympatico.ca> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 > Probably not. The DNA signature for James would > be established. You would be just chasing mutations > for the other lines descending from him. > > Peter > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Margie von Marenholtz > To: kincaid@rootsweb.com > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 4:47 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 > > > If 130404 and 15550 group together, would there be any value to having a > descendant of yet another son of James Woodburn K tested? > > Margie von Marenholtz > Silverdale, WA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:11 AM > Subject: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 > > > > The 22-37 marker panel for 130404 has been returned. He matches the > Group > > A > > AAV on all markers in this panel except marker 35 (CDYb) where he has a > 38 > > instead of the AAV 39. He has ordered 67 markers. > > > > Note: in reporting the results for the 1-12 panel, I mistyped the kit > > number. This is the correct kit number. 130404 believes descent from > James > > Woodburn b 1811 and Margaret Kuhns. The 38 on marker 35 matches 15550 > who > > also believes descent from James Woodburn. The 38 also matches 2519 who > > believes descent from Samuel/Johanna Walch b 1811. Samuel did not > > immigrate > > from Ireland. 2519 and 15550 also share a 22 at marker 50 (413b). It > will > > be > > interesting to see if 130404 also shares this mutation from the AAV 23. > > > > Sue Liedtke > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

JAMES WOODBURN KINKADE/KINKAID'S 7 SONS: 1841 - Philip Thomas Kinkade (only used Thomas) 1843 - David Kinkade - 15550 1845 - Samuel Kinkade 1847 - John Kinkade 1849 - James W. Kincaid 1851 - William Kinkade - 130404 1854 - Thompson Richison Kinkade, died in infancy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 8:01 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 > The only thing that would require another line from James is if the marker > 15 (459b) result were to come back as a 10. This is a major variance with > the Group A AAV and would need to be investigated. I don't anticipate that > happening. > > I would like to to know which sons130404 and 15550 descend through. > Technically if they both descend through the same son, the DNA signature > is > established for that son. If they descend through different sons, then > James > Woodburns signature is established. For practical purposes, even if they > descend through the same son, we can extrapulate the signiture for James > because others whose ancestors have similar birthdates share the same > results. > > Sue Liedtke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter A. Kincaid" <7kincaid@nb.sympatico.ca> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:01 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 > > >> Probably not. The DNA signature for James would >> be established. You would be just chasing mutations >> for the other lines descending from him. >> >> Peter >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Margie von Marenholtz >> To: kincaid@rootsweb.com >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 4:47 PM >> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 >> >> >> If 130404 and 15550 group together, would there be any value to having a >> descendant of yet another son of James Woodburn K tested? >> >> Margie von Marenholtz >> Silverdale, WA >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 7:11 AM >> Subject: [KINCAID] Results for DNA 130404 >> >> >> > The 22-37 marker panel for 130404 has been returned. He matches the >> Group >> > A >> > AAV on all markers in this panel except marker 35 (CDYb) where he has >> a >> 38 >> > instead of the AAV 39. He has ordered 67 markers. >> > >> > Note: in reporting the results for the 1-12 panel, I mistyped the kit >> > number. This is the correct kit number. 130404 believes descent from >> James >> > Woodburn b 1811 and Margaret Kuhns. The 38 on marker 35 matches 15550 >> who >> > also believes descent from James Woodburn. The 38 also matches 2519 >> who >> > believes descent from Samuel/Johanna Walch b 1811. Samuel did not >> > immigrate >> > from Ireland. 2519 and 15550 also share a 22 at marker 50 (413b). It >> will >> > be >> > interesting to see if 130404 also shares this mutation from the AAV >> 23. >> > >> > Sue Liedtke >> > >> > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> > >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message