Margie, Do you have a marriage for James Woodburn Kinkade's daughter Forrest Jane? I was sent a family lineage, which as I recall, showed that she married a Kinkade from another family, i.e. a grandson of George Kinkade/Sarah Traner, who was living in Hancock County, IL at the time. Barb Van Hout ----- Original Message ----- From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:23 PM Subject: [KINCAID] James Woodburn Kinkade/Kinkaid (15550) other male lines >I was in contact with H. Keith Kinkade 10 years ago but lost contact when > his eyesight began failing. He is descended from James Woodburn Kinkaids > youngest surviving son, William. I know of male descendants of his son > James W. Kincaid, but have never met them, just corresponded with one > sister > until my mother passed away last year. She appears to have lost interest > so > I will seek out her cousins and siblings. > > I will see if I can get hold of Keith in CA and see if he is interested; > however, I would only be able to sponsor the basic 25 marker test. > Knowing > my Kinkade family, asking estranged/unfamiliar family to contribute their > DNA and having to pay too will be a challenge! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle > > >> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern >> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too early >> to >> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a >> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 at >> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both >> mutations) >> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with >> further >> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the >> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor >> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's ancestor >> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another >> participant >> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would help >> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better >> picture >> of where he fits in. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> >>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE SHOPKEEPER >>> OF >>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE ALSO >>> TO >>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY >>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND >>> THIS: >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message