---- Barbara Van Hout <dutchtreat@prodigy.net> wrote: > Margie, > Do you have a marriage for James Woodburn Kinkade's daughter Forrest Jane? > I was sent a family lineage, which as I recall, showed that she married a > Kinkade from another family, i.e. a grandson of George Kinkade/Sarah Traner, > who was living in Hancock County, IL at the time. > > Barb Van Hout > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 12:23 PM > Subject: [KINCAID] James Woodburn Kinkade/Kinkaid (15550) other male lines > > > >I was in contact with H. Keith Kinkade 10 years ago but lost contact when > > his eyesight began failing. He is descended from James Woodburn Kinkaids > > youngest surviving son, William. I know of male descendants of his son > > James W. Kincaid, but have never met them, just corresponded with one > > sister > > until my mother passed away last year. She appears to have lost interest > > so > > I will seek out her cousins and siblings. > > > > I will see if I can get hold of Keith in CA and see if he is interested; > > however, I would only be able to sponsor the basic 25 marker test. > > Knowing > > my Kinkade family, asking estranged/unfamiliar family to contribute their > > DNA and having to pay too will be a challenge! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM > > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle > > > > > >> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern > >> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too early > >> to > >> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a > >> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 at > >> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both > >> mutations) > >> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with > >> further > >> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the > >> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor > >> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's ancestor > >> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another > >> participant > >> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would help > >> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better > >> picture > >> of where he fits in. > >> > >> Sue Liedtke > >> > >> > >>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE SHOPKEEPER > >>> OF > >>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE ALSO > >>> TO > >>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY > >>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND > >>> THIS: > >> > >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >> > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message