Sue, sent me the "stuff" I assume I can do it again as I did it before. I'm not sure what you mean when you say vetting was by Leslie. I provided her the information and if you mean she was the "custodian of the information I understand. It will take me a while as I just returned from West Virginia and the celebration of my Aunt Joan's (Kincaid Niday's 80 birthday!!! -----Original Message----- From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Sue Liedtke Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:50 AM To: kincaid@rootsweb.com Subject: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 Results for 135736's upgrade to 37 markers are now in. He matches the group A-1a AAV exactly at all markers. This is very, very interesting to the Fayette/Greenbrier WVA Kincaids and has implications for all Group A Kincaids as 135736 claims to George/Mary Campbell. 49289 in A-2b is vetted to the same ancestor. The vetting for 49289 was done by Leslie so we do not have the lineage available in the archives. I urge JoAnne (contact for 135736) to contact me for the vetting format. Bob (49289), I also urge you to contact me so that we can create a vetting post to submit to the list for review. Bob has the 9 at marker 15 (459b) which is the signature for set A-2. This makes reviewing his line of paramont interest as it calls into question the vetting. If both can be verified to George/Mary Campbell we will have an incidence of parallel mutation at this marker. This has implications for all A-2b Kincaids as it is possible that this marker has mutated several times. The paper trails in the Fayette area seem to indicate that almost all Kincaids in this region are descendents of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. The most logical lineage from the paperwork indicates that George/Mary Campbell, Thomas/Isabella/Eliza (130207 A-1a), William (33001 A-1c), and Harvey (101753 A-1a) are all sons of Thomas/Polly Davis (whom 33001 is vetted to). The paper trail also indicates that Thomas/Polly Davis is the son of Samuel of the 3 wives, who in turn is the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. 36856, 30078 and probably several more A-1a Kincaids from this region appear to be the descendents of John/Elizabeth Gillespie who is also appears to be the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. I urge all lines to work on vetting back to Thomas/Hannah so that the family relationships can be confirmed. SPECULATION FOLLOWS We know that Thomas's father is a John Kincaid and that Thomas appears 1st in Albemarle Co. I believe this John is John the Weaver and that many other A-1a Kincaids who trace from this area may either be his descendents or descendents of a brother or cousin. Sue Liedtke To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message