Those vetting posts sent to the list are archived at Rootsweb. This is one of the great advantages of doing the vetting via the list. Another is that there are many eyes reviewing the line so any problems can be found and addressed. The 3rd advantage is that list members from "daughter" lines or male lines at a brick wall may be able to tie in. Vettings done while Leslie was administrator have no public paper trail as she did not share the lineages and documentation. It would be wonderful if someone with expertise and time appeared who could host a site where all the lineages could be gathered. Alice has graciously contributed valuable space on her site to make the DNA chart available. Her site is invaluable to all of her lines so we are extremally greatful that she donates part of it to help us out until we find someone who can create a site devoted to the project. Sue ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <mlclegg@verizon.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > Isn't there an archive of documents that are submitted for vetting? > > Mary Lou > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Arnott" <kincaidfamily@qwest.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 11:51 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > > >> Sue, sent me the "stuff" I assume I can do it again as I did it before. >> I'm >> not sure what you mean when you say vetting was by Leslie. I provided her >> the information and if you mean she was the "custodian of the information >> I >> understand. It will take me a while as I just returned from West Virginia >> and the celebration of my Aunt Joan's (Kincaid Niday's 80 birthday!!! >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] >> On >> Behalf Of Sue Liedtke >> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:50 AM >> To: kincaid@rootsweb.com >> Subject: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 >> >> Results for 135736's upgrade to 37 markers are now in. He matches the >> group >> A-1a AAV exactly at all markers. >> >> This is very, very interesting to the Fayette/Greenbrier WVA Kincaids and >> has implications for all Group A Kincaids as 135736 claims to George/Mary >> Campbell. 49289 in A-2b is vetted to the same ancestor. The vetting for >> 49289 was done by Leslie so we do not have the lineage available in the >> archives. I urge JoAnne (contact for 135736) to contact me for the >> vetting >> format. Bob (49289), I also urge you to contact me so that we can create >> a >> vetting post to submit to the list for review. Bob has the 9 at marker 15 >> (459b) which is the signature for set A-2. This makes reviewing his line >> of >> paramont interest as it calls into question the vetting. If both can be >> verified to George/Mary Campbell we will have an incidence of parallel >> mutation at this marker. This has implications for all A-2b Kincaids as >> it >> is possible that this marker has mutated several times. >> >> The paper trails in the Fayette area seem to indicate that almost all >> Kincaids in this region are descendents of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. The >> most >> logical lineage from the paperwork indicates that George/Mary Campbell, >> Thomas/Isabella/Eliza (130207 A-1a), William (33001 A-1c), and Harvey >> (101753 A-1a) are all sons of Thomas/Polly Davis (whom 33001 is vetted >> to). >> The paper trail also indicates that Thomas/Polly Davis is the son of >> Samuel >> of the 3 wives, who in turn is the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. 36856, >> 30078 and probably several more A-1a Kincaids from this region appear to >> be >> the descendents of John/Elizabeth Gillespie who is also appears to be the >> son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. I urge all lines to work on vetting back to >> Thomas/Hannah so that the family relationships can be confirmed. >> >> SPECULATION FOLLOWS >> We know that Thomas's father is a John Kincaid and that Thomas appears >> 1st >> in Albemarle Co. I believe this John is John the Weaver and that many >> other >> A-1a Kincaids who trace from this area may either be his descendents or >> descendents of a brother or cousin. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca >> id%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message