Sue, I did contact Jo Anna and she is anxious to get her part done. She wanted a sample to go by in her vetting. I am looking for the old copy I had on Harvey Kincaid for her to go by. I am still looking for it. The reason I am writing to you is to ask you if we could not keep these ( your) posting on the West Virginia Kincaid group. Most of the people on our list is not part of the larger K-list. This may show them just how important it is to help us in the DNA project. Thanks, Toney K. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 11:50 AM Subject: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > Results for 135736's upgrade to 37 markers are now in. He matches the > group > A-1a AAV exactly at all markers. > > This is very, very interesting to the Fayette/Greenbrier WVA Kincaids and > has implications for all Group A Kincaids as 135736 claims to George/Mary > Campbell. 49289 in A-2b is vetted to the same ancestor. The vetting for > 49289 was done by Leslie so we do not have the lineage available in the > archives. I urge JoAnne (contact for 135736) to contact me for the vetting > format. Bob (49289), I also urge you to contact me so that we can create a > vetting post to submit to the list for review. Bob has the 9 at marker 15 > (459b) which is the signature for set A-2. This makes reviewing his line > of > paramont interest as it calls into question the vetting. If both can be > verified to George/Mary Campbell we will have an incidence of parallel > mutation at this marker. This has implications for all A-2b Kincaids as it > is possible that this marker has mutated several times. > > The paper trails in the Fayette area seem to indicate that almost all > Kincaids in this region are descendents of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. The most > logical lineage from the paperwork indicates that George/Mary Campbell, > Thomas/Isabella/Eliza (130207 A-1a), William (33001 A-1c), and Harvey > (101753 A-1a) are all sons of Thomas/Polly Davis (whom 33001 is vetted > to). > The paper trail also indicates that Thomas/Polly Davis is the son of > Samuel > of the 3 wives, who in turn is the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. 36856, > 30078 and probably several more A-1a Kincaids from this region appear to > be > the descendents of John/Elizabeth Gillespie who is also appears to be the > son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. I urge all lines to work on vetting back to > Thomas/Hannah so that the family relationships can be confirmed. > > SPECULATION FOLLOWS > We know that Thomas's father is a John Kincaid and that Thomas appears 1st > in Albemarle Co. I believe this John is John the Weaver and that many > other > A-1a Kincaids who trace from this area may either be his descendents or > descendents of a brother or cousin. > > Sue Liedtke > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message