Mary Lou, There is an archive now that we vet on the list. Originally, the information was emailed or snail mailed to an individual who proclaimed the person was vetted or not. If you remember someone posting the vetting information to the Mail List then yes, it would be in the archives. I am very sorry that some have to go through the painful process or re-doing some work, but I am afraid it cannot be helped. Vetting on the List started a few years ago and this was an excellent move. Now more people are involved and the more eyes that look at something the more chance that we see errors or receive more suggestions as to how to further our documentation. Or, as sometimes happens, the chances increase in our finding connections with cousins. Ruth Cherecwich In a message dated 2/9/2009 1:35:37 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, mlclegg@verizon.net writes: Isn't there an archive of documents that are submitted for vetting? Mary Lou ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Arnott" <kincaidfamily@qwest.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > Sue, sent me the "stuff" I assume I can do it again as I did it before. > I'm > not sure what you mean when you say vetting was by Leslie. I provided her > the information and if you mean she was the "custodian of the information > I > understand. It will take me a while as I just returned from West Virginia > and the celebration of my Aunt Joan's (Kincaid Niday's 80 birthday!!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On > Behalf Of Sue Liedtke > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:50 AM > To: kincaid@rootsweb.com > Subject: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > > Results for 135736's upgrade to 37 markers are now in. He matches the > group > A-1a AAV exactly at all markers. > > This is very, very interesting to the Fayette/Greenbrier WVA Kincaids and > has implications for all Group A Kincaids as 135736 claims to George/Mary > Campbell. 49289 in A-2b is vetted to the same ancestor. The vetting for > 49289 was done by Leslie so we do not have the lineage available in the > archives. I urge JoAnne (contact for 135736) to contact me for the vetting > format. Bob (49289), I also urge you to contact me so that we can create a > vetting post to submit to the list for review. Bob has the 9 at marker 15 > (459b) which is the signature for set A-2. This makes reviewing his line > of > paramont interest as it calls into question the vetting. If both can be > verified to George/Mary Campbell we will have an incidence of parallel > mutation at this marker. This has implications for all A-2b Kincaids as it > is possible that this marker has mutated several times. > > The paper trails in the Fayette area seem to indicate that almost all > Kincaids in this region are descendents of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. The most > logical lineage from the paperwork indicates that George/Mary Campbell, > Thomas/Isabella/Eliza (130207 A-1a), William (33001 A-1c), and Harvey > (101753 A-1a) are all sons of Thomas/Polly Davis (whom 33001 is vetted > to). > The paper trail also indicates that Thomas/Polly Davis is the son of > Samuel > of the 3 wives, who in turn is the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. 36856, > 30078 and probably several more A-1a Kincaids from this region appear to > be > the descendents of John/Elizabeth Gillespie who is also appears to be the > son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. I urge all lines to work on vetting back to > Thomas/Hannah so that the family relationships can be confirmed. > > SPECULATION FOLLOWS > We know that Thomas's father is a John Kincaid and that Thomas appears 1st > in Albemarle Co. I believe this John is John the Weaver and that many > other > A-1a Kincaids who trace from this area may either be his descendents or > descendents of a brother or cousin. > > Sue Liedtke >

Actually, I though my relative's information was vetted on the "list" but it is no problem to do it again when the time is available! -----Original Message----- From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Utahn1@aol.com Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:25 AM To: kincaid@rootsweb.com Subject: [KINCAID] Vetting Archives Mary Lou, There is an archive now that we vet on the list. Originally, the information was emailed or snail mailed to an individual who proclaimed the person was vetted or not. If you remember someone posting the vetting information to the Mail List then yes, it would be in the archives. I am very sorry that some have to go through the painful process or re-doing some work, but I am afraid it cannot be helped. Vetting on the List started a few years ago and this was an excellent move. Now more people are involved and the more eyes that look at something the more chance that we see errors or receive more suggestions as to how to further our documentation. Or, as sometimes happens, the chances increase in our finding connections with cousins. Ruth Cherecwich In a message dated 2/9/2009 1:35:37 A.M. Mountain Standard Time, mlclegg@verizon.net writes: Isn't there an archive of documents that are submitted for vetting? Mary Lou ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Arnott" <kincaidfamily@qwest.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 11:51 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > Sue, sent me the "stuff" I assume I can do it again as I did it before. > I'm > not sure what you mean when you say vetting was by Leslie. I provided her > the information and if you mean she was the "custodian of the information > I > understand. It will take me a while as I just returned from West Virginia > and the celebration of my Aunt Joan's (Kincaid Niday's 80 birthday!!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On > Behalf Of Sue Liedtke > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 9:50 AM > To: kincaid@rootsweb.com > Subject: [KINCAID] DNA results for 135736 > > Results for 135736's upgrade to 37 markers are now in. He matches the > group > A-1a AAV exactly at all markers. > > This is very, very interesting to the Fayette/Greenbrier WVA Kincaids and > has implications for all Group A Kincaids as 135736 claims to George/Mary > Campbell. 49289 in A-2b is vetted to the same ancestor. The vetting for > 49289 was done by Leslie so we do not have the lineage available in the > archives. I urge JoAnne (contact for 135736) to contact me for the vetting > format. Bob (49289), I also urge you to contact me so that we can create a > vetting post to submit to the list for review. Bob has the 9 at marker 15 > (459b) which is the signature for set A-2. This makes reviewing his line > of > paramont interest as it calls into question the vetting. If both can be > verified to George/Mary Campbell we will have an incidence of parallel > mutation at this marker. This has implications for all A-2b Kincaids as it > is possible that this marker has mutated several times. > > The paper trails in the Fayette area seem to indicate that almost all > Kincaids in this region are descendents of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. The most > logical lineage from the paperwork indicates that George/Mary Campbell, > Thomas/Isabella/Eliza (130207 A-1a), William (33001 A-1c), and Harvey > (101753 A-1a) are all sons of Thomas/Polly Davis (whom 33001 is vetted > to). > The paper trail also indicates that Thomas/Polly Davis is the son of > Samuel > of the 3 wives, who in turn is the son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. 36856, > 30078 and probably several more A-1a Kincaids from this region appear to > be > the descendents of John/Elizabeth Gillespie who is also appears to be the > son of Thomas/Hannah Tincher. I urge all lines to work on vetting back to > Thomas/Hannah so that the family relationships can be confirmed. > > SPECULATION FOLLOWS > We know that Thomas's father is a John Kincaid and that Thomas appears 1st > in Albemarle Co. I believe this John is John the Weaver and that many > other > A-1a Kincaids who trace from this area may either be his descendents or > descendents of a brother or cousin. > > Sue Liedtke > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message