If someone was vetted before the current method, they are "grandfathered" in without sending a post or going through the list vetting process. Unfortunately we do not have the lineage information available. You would need to contact each person whose lineage you are interested in. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:58 AM Subject: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > Norman has done a great service to all of us by creating Kincaid Vetting > and Lineage Post Central. It makes the posts so much easier to find. > > What about the vettings that were done before the list? Is there some way > to find them? Are they considered valid or do they need to be vetted by > the list members? > > Mary Lou > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
How do we know who has been grandfathered? Is there at least a list of who was vetted and who they were vetted to? Could we have anyone on the list who was vetted earlier send a copy of it to the list so the information would be available to us. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Liedtke" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:50 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > If someone was vetted before the current method, they are "grandfathered" > in > without sending a post or going through the list vetting process. > Unfortunately we do not have the lineage information available. You would > need to contact each person whose lineage you are interested in. > > Sue Liedtke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:58 AM > Subject: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > >> Norman has done a great service to all of us by creating Kincaid Vetting >> and Lineage Post Central. It makes the posts so much easier to find. >> >> What about the vettings that were done before the list? Is there some >> way >> to find them? Are they considered valid or do they need to be vetted by >> the list members? >> >> Mary Lou >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> To join the DNA project, go to: >> www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
We didn't keep track of who was vetted before the current process was adopted. Our first administrator was Peter. He did not actually "vet" lines but rather used words in short lineage compilations to indicate his view on whether the line was valid. The chart was developed in its present form while Leslie was administrator. She alone would communicate with participants then tell me when she was vetting a line and who it was to be vetted to. I do not think she required a formal, consolidated listing of each link though I know she did require proof documents before vetting a line. Don and Ruth each went through the vetting process with her and would know better what she required. She would also do some research on her own and may have vetted some lines based on that research. Anyone vetted during her tenure may not have anything to "copy" and would have to develop a post from scratch. While it is desirable and encouraged that all vetted lines make their lineage proofs available, the current administrative team feels that it would be an undo burden to require each participant to go through the vetting process for a second time in order to maintain their vetted statice. It might also be added that some participants are no longer actively doing Kincaid research and would not be interested or able to repeat the process.. Norman has done an excellant job in combing the archives. If a post was made it should be on his site. If a lineage does not appear there, the stated ancestor was likely vetted by Leslie. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:40 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > How do we know who has been grandfathered? Is there at least a list of > who > was vetted and who they were vetted to? > > Could we have anyone on the list who was vetted earlier send a copy of it > to > the list so the information would be available to us. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:50 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > >> If someone was vetted before the current method, they are "grandfathered" >> in >> without sending a post or going through the list vetting process. >> Unfortunately we do not have the lineage information available. You would >> need to contact each person whose lineage you are interested in. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:58 AM >> Subject: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids >> >> >>> Norman has done a great service to all of us by creating Kincaid Vetting >>> and Lineage Post Central. It makes the posts so much easier to find. >>> >>> What about the vettings that were done before the list? Is there some >>> way >>> to find them? Are they considered valid or do they need to be vetted by >>> the list members? >>> >>> Mary Lou >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>> >>> To join the DNA project, go to: >>> www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >> >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> To join the DNA project, go to: >> www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >
I did find Ruth's vetting post from 2005 and have added it to the list I have compiled. I add each new vetting post to my compilation once all comments and questions have been addressed and is considered vetted. I'll go through the Kincaid list archives again to see if I missed any. I just found Ruth's vetting post yesterday. Sincerely Norman Kincaide --- On Wed, 5/4/11, Sue Liedtke <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Sue Liedtke <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 2:36 PM > We didn't keep track of who was > vetted before the current process was > adopted. Our first administrator was Peter. He did not > actually "vet" lines > but rather used words in short lineage compilations to > indicate his view on > whether the line was valid. The chart was developed in its > present form > while Leslie was administrator. She alone would communicate > with > participants then tell me when she was vetting a line and > who it was to be > vetted to. I do not think she required a formal, > consolidated listing of > each link though I know she did require proof documents > before vetting a > line. Don and Ruth each went through the vetting process > with her and would > know better what she required. She would also do some > research on her own > and may have vetted some lines based on that research. > Anyone vetted during > her tenure may not have anything to "copy" and would have > to develop a post > from scratch. While it is desirable and encouraged that all > vetted lines > make their lineage proofs available, the current > administrative team feels > that it would be an undo burden to require each participant > to go through > the vetting process for a second time in order to maintain > their vetted > statice. It might also be added that some participants are > no longer > actively doing Kincaid research and would not be interested > or able to > repeat the process.. > > Norman has done an excellant job in combing the archives. > If a post was made > it should be on his site. If a lineage does not appear > there, the stated > ancestor was likely vetted by Leslie. > > Sue Liedtke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:40 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > > > How do we know who has been grandfathered? Is > there at least a list of > > who > > was vetted and who they were vetted to? > > > > Could we have anyone on the list who was vetted > earlier send a copy of it > > to > > the list so the information would be available to us. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sue Liedtke" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > > > > >> If someone was vetted before the current method, > they are "grandfathered" > >> in > >> without sending a post or going through the list > vetting process. > >> Unfortunately we do not have the lineage > information available. You would > >> need to contact each person whose lineage you are > interested in. > >> > >> Sue Liedtke > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:58 AM > >> Subject: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > >> > >> > >>> Norman has done a great service to all of us > by creating Kincaid Vetting > >>> and Lineage Post Central. It makes the > posts so much easier to find. > >>> > >>> What about the vettings that were done before > the list? Is there some > >>> way > >>> to find them? Are they considered valid > or do they need to be vetted by > >>> the list members? > >>> > >>> Mary Lou > >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart > in Excel: > >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > >>> > >>> To join the DNA project, go to: > >>> > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email to > >>> [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the > message > >>> > >> > >> > >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in > Excel: > >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > >> > >> To join the DNA project, go to: > >> > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to > >> [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >> > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in > Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > > To join the DNA project, go to: > > > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > > [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message >