Sure, I have attached it. If it needs correction, please insert them and send it back and I will upload the corrected version. Norman Kincaide --- On Wed, 5/4/11, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 5:49 PM > > Norm, Could you please forward me the copy of the vetting > post you are using? I had to revise the original vetting > post because of one great error and want to make sure the > correct one is used. > > Thanks, > > Ruth Cherecwich > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Kincaide <[email protected]> > To: kincaid <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, May 4, 2011 11:01 am > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > > I did find Ruth's vetting post from 2005 and have added it > to the list I have > ompiled. I add each new vetting post to my compilation once > all comments and > uestions have been addressed and is considered vetted. I'll > go through the > incaid list archives again to see if I missed any. I just > found Ruth's vetting > ost yesterday. > Sincerely > orman Kincaide > --- On Wed, 5/4/11, Sue Liedtke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Sue Liedtke <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > To: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2011, 2:36 PM > We didn't keep track of who was > vetted before the current process was > adopted. Our first administrator was Peter. He did not > actually "vet" lines > but rather used words in short lineage compilations to > indicate his view on > whether the line was valid. The chart was developed in > its > present form > while Leslie was administrator. She alone would > communicate > with > participants then tell me when she was vetting a line and > who it was to be > vetted to. I do not think she required a formal, > consolidated listing of > each link though I know she did require proof documents > before vetting a > line. Don and Ruth each went through the vetting process > with her and would > know better what she required. She would also do some > research on her own > and may have vetted some lines based on that research. > Anyone vetted during > her tenure may not have anything to "copy" and would have > to develop a post > from scratch. While it is desirable and encouraged that > all > vetted lines > make their lineage proofs available, the current > administrative team feels > that it would be an undo burden to require each > participant > to go through > the vetting process for a second time in order to > maintain > their vetted > statice. It might also be added that some participants > are > no longer > actively doing Kincaid research and would not be > interested > or able to > repeat the process.. > > Norman has done an excellant job in combing the archives. > If a post was made > it should be on his site. If a lineage does not appear > there, the stated > ancestor was likely vetted by Leslie. > > Sue Liedtke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:40 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > > > How do we know who has been grandfathered?  Is > there at least a list of > > who > > was vetted and who they were vetted to? > > > > Could we have anyone on the list who was vetted > earlier send a copy of it > > to > > the list so the information would be available to > us. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Sue Liedtke" <[email protected]> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > > > > > >> If someone was vetted before the current method, > they are "grandfathered" > >> in > >> without sending a post or going through the list > vetting process. > >> Unfortunately we do not have the lineage > information available. You would > >> need to contact each person whose lineage you > are > interested in. > >> > >> Sue Liedtke > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Mary Lou Clegg" <[email protected]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 7:58 AM > >> Subject: [KINCAID] Vetted Kincaids > >> > >> > >>> Norman has done a great service to all of us > by creating Kincaid Vetting > >>> and Lineage Post Central.  It makes the > posts so much easier to find. > >>> > >>> What about the vettings that were done > before > the list?  Is there some > >>> way > >>> to find them?  Are they considered > valid > or do they need to be vetted by > >>> the list members? > >>> > >>> Mary Lou > >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA > chart > in Excel: > >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > >>> > >>> To join the DNA project, go to: > >>> > > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> ------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email to > >>> [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the > message > >>> > >> > >> > >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in > Excel: > >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > >> > >> To join the DNA project, go to: > >> > > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an > email > to > >> [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > >> quotes in the subject and the body of the > message > >> > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in > Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > > To join the DNA project, go to: > > > > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to > > > [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >   http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > To join the DNA project, go to: > ww.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > ------------------------------ > o unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > > ith the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of > he message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > To join the DNA project, go to: > www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Kincaid&Code=J21027 > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message >