testing

Who was the John Kinkade who assigned land to Henry Robeson in Monongalia County in the 1770's? Or did Henry Robeson (Robinson?) assign the land to John Kinkade? The Carters of Greene County, Tennessee: "The Ohio Company of Virginia organized in 1748 to engage in land speculation and trade with the Indians. In 1749 it obtained a grant of 200,000 acres along the upper Ohio on condition that a fort should be established with a garrison and that 100 families should be settled on the grant. If these conditions were met then 300,000 more acres would be granted. The company established a headquarters and built a storehouse at Wills Creek and were in the process of building a post at the Forks of the Ohio when the French captured it. The French then built their own fort there and called it Fort Du Quesne. (It was Robert Carter than was connected to this enterprise). When the French and Indian War broke out the settlers had to withdraw. And when the war ended the proclamation of 1763 forbade settlement west of the mountains. But this caused such an uproar among the settlers who had put their money, toil and sweat into these lands, that in 1768 all lands from the Alleghenies west to the Ohio River were purchased from the Indians. Only then were the settlers allowed to move in. The record book which locates John Carters grant was thought for many years to have been destroyed in a fire which burned the Monongalia County records in 1796, but was found much later in a barrel with some old curtains thrown over it. It reads: Henry Robeson assignee to JOHN KINKADE is entitled to three hundred and twenty seven acres of land in Monongalia County on Wests Run agreeable to a former Survey made by John Trimble in behalf of John Carter to include his Settlement made in the year 1770. (Ref: Core Vol, 1, The Monongalia Story)." ************************************ Abraham Carter of Greene County, Tennessee: http://74.125.95.104/search?q=cache:wKAuirR2gbUJ:saddlepin.150m.com/carter%2520kith%2520and%2520kin.doc%2520by%2520Sylvia%2520Brooks.doc+%22Henry+Robeson%22+%2B+%22John+Kinkade&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us The Virginia land commissioners left a voluminous record of the land grants in the Monongahela country which is preserved in 442 hand -written pages in the Monongahela county courthouse in Morgantown, West Virginia, the present county seat. the record shows that a total of 1,215 homestead grants were made or validated by the commission. some of the validated grants were for settlements made as early as 1766. these old homestead entries provide a very valuable list of early settlers and their holdings, and include many useful references to the history and geography of the area. (the entries are summarized in Volume I of earl E. coreÕs The Monongahela Story, a projected 5-volume history of the county.) During their stay in western Virginia, the Carters laid claim to, or acquired from earlier claimants, four tracts of land in the area that became Monongahela and Preston counties, west Virginia. the oldest of these claims was made by John Carter I in 1770 and was located on West's Run in an area that has been known historically as the Forks of Cheat. This is a large triangular tract of land lying between the Monongahela and Cheat Rivers which converge a few miles north of the southern boundary of Pennsylvania. The tract includes a small triangle in Pennsylvania and a much larger area in Monongahela County, West Virginia. There can be no doubt that John Carter’s land claim was on the virginia side of the border and the certificate so indicates, but when two of John’s sons, John II and Jacob, applied many years later for pensions for military service, they were under the impression that they were residents of Pennsylvania at the time of their enlistment. John Carter settled on his land claim, shown by a later survey to amount to 327 acres, in the year 1770, but the land certificate confirming the claim was not issued until after the local land office was established in 1779. when that happened, John Carter was not around to receive the certificate. The Carter family had left the area in 1777 and had moved to Surry County, North Carolina. Before they left, John Carter and the three other Carter claimants had assigned their claims, with improvements, to others. John sold or traded his claim to an assignee who passed it on to a second assignee who actually received the land certificate. The certificate reads as follows: Henry Robeson assigns to John Kinkade is entitled to three hundred and twenty seven acres of land in Mongongalia County on Wests run agreeable to a former survey made by John Trimble in behalf of John Carter to include his settlement made in the year 1770. In addition to the John Carter claim of 1770, three other Carter claims were made, each totaling 400 acres, over the next several years. these claims were originally settled by others, one in 1772 and two in 1775, and were transferred to the Carters by assignment. The 1772 claim of 400 acres was assigned by the original claimant to Caleb Carter, oldest son of Levi Carter, Sr..... of John Carter in Monongahela Coun http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:ttFD3e1dpzgJ:saddlepin.150m.com/John%2520Denton%2520Carter%2520Research.doc+%22John+Kinkade%22+%2B+%22John+Carter%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

Hi James - Back home again. Is William T. Kincaid who was married to Elizabeth Maas (Mass, Mace) the one you want? He served in KY MIlitia and was living in 1871 in Greenfield, Green, Illinois. Ruth Cherecwich In a message dated 8/21/2008 5:06:03 P.M. Mountain Daylight Time, jakin94939@aol.com writes: Hi, My name is James Akin, Lexington, Ky and I am a descendent of William Kincaid who fought in the War of 1812. In an email exchange noted on Rootsweb.com you stated that you had a copy of his War of 1812 pension file. I was wondering if you could perhaps email a copy to me or if you would rather use regular mail my address is: James Akin 1231 Todds Sta Lexington, KY 40509 Thank you very much for your help. To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid %20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message **************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here. (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)

The upgrade to 67 markers by #31493 A-1a are starting to come in. The 1st panel with markers 38-46 are in. The results match the AAV for Group A exactly. The results for the upgrades ordered during the upgrade sale are taking a while to come in. FTDNA must have had a good response. I am waiting for the rest of the results for those who have upgraded to come in before sending a new chart to Alice. I do want to remind everyone that the url for the chart is at the end of list posts. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Kincaid" <akincaid@vicbar.com.au> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:51 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] New DNA results > Dear Sue > > Could you please send me an email including the Kincaid of all spellings > DNA > chart. The link I have seems to have expired > > Best wishes > > Andrew Kincaid (Kit 26838) >

While looking for anything in genealogy my husband used to say "don't you know it will be in the last place you look?" Oh, yes, it always was. Luella<BR><BR><BR> **************<BR>It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel deal here.<BR> (http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)</HTML>

Dear Sue Could you please send me an email including the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart. The link I have seems to have expired Best wishes Andrew Kincaid (Kit 26838) -----Original Message----- From: kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:kincaid-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Sue Liedtke Sent: Sunday, 27 May 2007 11:50 PM To: kincaidfamily@qwest.net; kincaid@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KINCAID] New DNA results One book that may be of help is "Trace Your Roots with DNA" by Megan Smolenyak Smolenyak and Ann Turner. It comes in paperback and should be available at national bookstore chains. The book assumes you know little but does become more complex as you go along. Sue Liedtke ----- Original Message ----- From: <kincaidfamily@qwest.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 6:06 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] New DNA results Peter, I appreciate your DNA insight. Would you be able to recommend a good reference book for those of us who want to learn more about DNA testing and ancestry? I'm interested in the application of DNA testing to genealogy specifically rather than the general topic or forensic DNA. Thanks. Original Message: ----------------- From: Peter A. Kincaid 7kincaids@rogers.com Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 14:25:21 -0300 To: kincaid@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [KINCAID] New DNA results For the 38-67 marker results I think it would be useful at this point to give the actual results. With the limited number of results technically the group node is not written in stone. The picture could change which would cause confusion down the road. For some time now I speculated that the ancestral values for DYS 459 a,b was 9,9. It has been assumed that the ancestral value was 9,10 making sample 2562 representative of the ancestral value. The evidence now favours 9,9. Thus, anyone with 9,10 would count one mutation in their line. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 10:06 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] New DNA results > The last of the results for upgrade to 67 markers has been received for > #4164. He continues to match Group A node. > Sue Liedtke > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 9:49 AM > Subject: [KINCAID] New DNA results > > >> The marker 38-60 results have been posted for #4164 in Group A set 2a. >> Norman matches the Group A node at these markers. >> >> #88507 has checked in. His DNA places him in Group C set 1. He believes >> descent from Charles Aden Kincaid of Indiana b 1891 married 1914 to >> Gertrude >> King. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart, go to: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart, go to: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart, go to: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinc aid%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------- myhosting.com - Premium MicrosoftR WindowsR and Linux web and application hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart, go to: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls-------------------------------To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email toKINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotesin the subject and the body of the message To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart, go to: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kinca id%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Kelly, Once Family Tree DNA receives the kit they will send an email giving a date for the results however the new lab has been turning out the results in about half the time they suggest. I would guess you will have the results in less than a month. Don W. Kincaid Kincaid Surname DNA Admin. Team donwkincaid@cox.net 254 631-5684 ----- Original Message ----- From: lewisjo@junct.com To: KINCAID@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:19 AM Subject: [KINCAID] New to List, PA-IN-MO Kincade/Kincaid's Bruce, Thank you! My dad sent the DNA kit in Saturday, I'll be on pin and needles until it comes back! I think it is simply amazing what technology can do for us these days. Does anyone know about how many weeks it takes for the results to come in? Kelly To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Bruce, Thank you! My dad sent the DNA kit in Saturday, I'll be on pin and needles until it comes back! I think it is simply amazing what technology can do for us these days. Does anyone know about how many weeks it takes for the results to come in? Kelly

I always thought it strange that these Kincaids just appeared in Hamilton Township, they had to come from somewhere.  Norm, This is true but it's not necessary that "somewhere" is Lancaster, Chester, Virginia, or even America. I think sometimes we get too caught up in this idea that we have to find the answers here. Bruce

I'm a bit late in seeing this but that's awesome Kelly, welcome aboard. Bruce Teague ---- lewisjo@junct.com wrote: > Greetings to all; my name is Kelly Kincade and I am new to the list. I > tried to post this message the other day, but I guess I was unsuccessful. > I have been reading the archives for the last couple of months, but just > got the nerve to actually join and use the list. I will be posting my > lineage very soon to the list, hopefully it will help someone, and > possibly get me past this "road-block" that I have encountered. I have > gotten as far back as Mathew/Elizabeth Humble Kincade/Kincaid. It seems > his father is in question. > So, in order to maybe steer me in a clearer direction, my father has > joined the DNA project and requested a kit. Seems like a very good deal > through the end of August at the reduced rate. I look forward to joining > this extended family, and hope that I may contribute as much as all of you > have. > > A note to Ruth, my heart, prayers and thoughts are with you. I lost my > mother last year. I hope comfort comes to you soon. > > Kelly Kincade-Lewis > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

The kit will be mailed this morning. I guess it will take time once receive. Do they notify you when they get results? Ginger Kincade On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Don W. Kincaid < donwkincaid1@frontiernet.net> wrote: > Ron & Ginger, > > Welcome to the Kincaid's of all spellings Surname DNA Project! We just got > notification that the order we placed for Ron's 37 marker has been accepted > by Family Tree DNA. They will send you an email confirming this and tell you > when the kit will be shipped, likely this afternoon. > > Anyone else want to join? Ron & Ginger are hoping the DNA results will help > them break down their brick wall. > > Don > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls<http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/%7Eadgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Morning Ginger, The new lab has really decreased the time it takes to get DNA results back. As just a volunteer for the Kincaid project, I can't predict how long it will take but can tell you that most of the 37 markers tests done recently have taken less than half what FTDNA says in their email telling you when to expect the results. Once FTDNA has the results, you will get an email telling you the test is complete and a link to your personal dna webpage where you will be able to see all the other Kincaid's of all spellings whom Ron matches and their email addresses in case you want to contact them. You will also be able to see the percentage probability of having a common ancestor with those you match. The rest of us will be interested to see Ron's results also! Don W. Kincaid Kincaid Surname DNA Admin. Team donwkincaid@cox.net 254 631-5684 ----- Original Message ----- From: Ron & Ginger Kincade To: kincaid@rootsweb.com Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:02 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] FTDNA SIZZLING SUMMER SALE! The kit will be mailed this morning. I guess it will take time once receive. Do they notify you when they get results? Ginger Kincade On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Don W. Kincaid < donwkincaid1@frontiernet.net> wrote: > Ron & Ginger, > > Welcome to the Kincaid's of all spellings Surname DNA Project! We just got > notification that the order we placed for Ron's 37 marker has been accepted > by Family Tree DNA. They will send you an email confirming this and tell you > when the kit will be shipped, likely this afternoon. > > Anyone else want to join? Ron & Ginger are hoping the DNA results will help > them break down their brick wall. > > Don > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls<http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/%7Eadgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks, Margie. I will correct the e-mail address for both and enter the ancestor information for 15550 in his line. In the comment column I will put >William for him but need to know which son 15550 comes from so I can do the same in his comment column. 15550 is not vetted. I have attached a vetting format if you would like to go through the vetting process. If you decide to do this for either participant, it works best if you fill out the form as best you can and return it to me. I can then go over it with an eye to clarity and form. It really helps to have someone not familiar with the family try to follow your line of reasoning before it goes to the list. Sue ----- Original Message ----- From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > My email address will be used for 130404; as well as 15550, which needs to > be updated to dieckhorst@q.com). The actual contributor is Harry Keith > Kinkade, b. 1929. Keith told me that he has macular degeneration and that > is why he no longer does genealogy. He did all the early James Woodburn > Kinkade research in the 1960's and 70's. We have just resumed contact > after > an approximate 20 year lapse. I have talked to him about getting > documentation on Keith's grandfather William. The state of Iowa refused > to > let me have the death record as I was not a direct descendant. It is > amazing how some states don't care what my relationship, if any is, and > others want only a direct descendant to get a record. Unfortunately, > most > of my Kinkades were in states that don't post every vital record online! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:42 AM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > > >> Margie is this kit #130404? >> I will need to know who is contact and have permission to put the e-mail >> address on the chart. >> >> We have had several new orders for tests in the last few days, at least >> some >> of which are long sought after lines. I am hoping that lineage and >> contact >> info will be available by the time the results are returned. I would be >> happy to send vetting formats to any who wish to start on that process. I >> am >> always happy to help (time permitting) anyone with organizing their >> information for clarity and to present the strongest arguement possible. >> Please contact me off list. seleaml@actionnet.net if you would like a >> format. Please include your kit number so I know for sure who I am >> talking >> with. >> >> Barb, thank you for your input on the vetting post for #11207 A-1b. I do >> appreciate all those that take the time to look through the posts and >> respond. It is so easy to miss something that may not be as clear as it >> should be. With many eyes tracing the line we are more likely to end up >> with >> solid links. Confirmation as well as questions are welcome contributions. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> >> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:10 PM >> Subject: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate >> >> >>> Sue: The grandson of James Woodburn Kinkade's son William has agreed to >>> participate in the DNA Project. Keith Kinkade was an avid Kinkade >>> researcher in the 1960's and 1970's and was the driving force behind my >>> own >>> Kinkade research. I am working on ordering a 67 marker kit for him now. >>> Margie >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >>> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM >>> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle >>> >>> >>>> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern >>>> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too early >>>> to >>>> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a >>>> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 >>>> at >>>> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both >>>> mutations) >>>> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with >>>> further >>>> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the >>>> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor >>>> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's >>>> ancestor >>>> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another >>>> participant >>>> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would help >>>> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better >>>> picture >>>> of where he fits in. >>>> >>>> Sue Liedtke >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE SHOPKEEPER >>>>> OF >>>>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE >>>>> ALSO >>>>> TO >>>>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY >>>>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND >>>>> THIS: >>>> >>>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>> >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

>From the Scottish Parochial Records as transcribed by the LDS people (which I have found to be quite accurate): Jean Storie, daughter of John Storie and Janet Kinkead was baptized in Govan Parish, County Lanark, Scotland on 24 December 1693. John Story, son of John Story and Jonet Kinkaid, was baptized in Govan Parish, County Lanark, Scotland on 24 May 1696. Marion Story, daughter of John Story and Jonet Kinkaid was baptized in Govan Parish, County Lanark, Scotland on 20 November 1698. Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry Kincaid" <larryk34@gmail.com> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Samuel Kincade Jr. > Hi Peter, Norman, > I passed on your question to my Storey collegue (out of) Bulter county > about > the Storey-Kincaid connection in Scotland, and this is what he replied: > > The info we have about the Northern Scotland Storeys was in the book "The > Steel Bonnets". That particular quote came I think from a geneologist > named > Jack Storey in Belfast who my Dad has been corresponding with. If he > hasn't > already, your expert should read the *History of Butler County > PA*(available online). The Kincades are prominently mentioned > throughout. > Samuel Kincade and Alexander Storey are noted as founders of the Bear > Creek > Presbyterian Church located between today's Petrolia and Fairview, PA, > and > Samuel was a Justice of the Peace. We are going to drive up there later > this > week to look around. I'll keep my eye out for any Kincades. I would, of > course, be interested in more of your expert's information about the > Storey-Kincaid connection in Govan. Storey

Mary Hart, If you are on the Kincaid List, your mail box seems to be full. An email we sent you was returned. Don W. Kincaid Kincaid Surname DNA Admin. Team donwkincaid@cox.net 254 631-5684

Barb, I tried writing to her at <boen@koyote.com> but it came back to me as undeliverable. Sally Standley ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara Van Hout" <dutchtreat@prodigy.net> To: <Kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:32 PM Subject: [KINCAID] Alexander Kincaid (Mary Catherine Hensley) and LewisCounty, TN > Here is an e-mail from Brenda Kincaid Boen----she descends from the same > Kincaid family as Sally Standley, DNA # #11207 A-1b, it appears. > > HENSLEY-KINCAID Seeking information on the HENSLEY and KINCAID (KINCADE) > families who lived in Lewis and Maury County, Tennessee. I am descended > from John Gabriel HENSLEY through their son Gabriel Perry HENSLEY and his > son Lee Bentley HENSLEY. My grandparents were Theodore Bud KINCAID (son of > Mary Catherine HENSLEY & Alexander KINCAID) and Lola Lee HENSLEY (daughter > of Lee Bentley HENSLEY and Mary Caroline HIGGINS). I believe that John > Gabriel's parents were William HENSLEY and Nancy GARDNER. Mary Catherine > HENSLEY KINCAID married a second time to William Anderson SHARP. > > Brenda's family beginning with Alexander Kincaid: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com:80/~brendaboen/Our_Family/Kincaid/kincaid.html > > > > Alexander Kincade sold 174+acres in Lewis Co.TN to Robert J. Newsom 14 >> July 1853. Property included a mill. No explanation of how 21 yr old >> Alexander acquired the property. > >> 1850 Census Lewis Co. TN Civil Dist #5 August 29 >> James Kincade 53 cabinet maker KY >> Elizabeth 45 TN >> James P 22 cabinet maker TN >> Alexander 18 cabinet maker TN >> Samuel B 17 cabinet maker TN >> Elizabeth A 15 TN >> Rufus A 13 TN >> Sarah P 11 TN >> Rachel C 8 TN >> Martha E 4 TN >> William L (sic T). 1 TN >> > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Margie, I was able to trace this William Kinkade family back to Union County, Iowa, 1880-1930, >1860 & 1870 Hancock Co, IL>1850 Westmoreland Co, PA>1840 Greene Co, PA-- In the 1840 Greene County, PA census, there was a James Kincaid, JR. next to a William Kincaid, both a. 20-30 with wives a. 20-30. James had a son under a. 5. Do you know when James W. Kincaid married? The 1840 Greene Co, PA census shows a William Kincaid, Esq. family, --large family--with William a. 60-70 as the head. 1830 Greene County, PA shows a James Kincaid a. 40-50 with one male a.15-20 and one female a. 50-60. This younger male matches James W Kincaid's age, but more research is needed in Greene county, PA. The William Kincaid, Esq. of 1840 Greene County doesn't show up in 1830 in the Greene County census, according to ancestry.com's records. The 1820 and 1810 censuses for Bedford County, PA, Bethel Township, show a James Kincaid of the right age to be the father of James Kincaid, Jr of the 1840 Greene County census. In 1810 James didn't have a son, but in 1820 James had one son under age 10. The early census information for Pennsylvania would need records to prove everything and may be wrong on what I have found. Just sending this because it may suggest counties for more research. Barbara ----- Original Message ----- From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > My email address will be used for 130404; as well as 15550, which needs to > be updated to dieckhorst@q.com). The actual contributor is Harry Keith > Kinkade, b. 1929. Keith told me that he has macular degeneration and that > is why he no longer does genealogy. He did all the early James Woodburn > Kinkade research in the 1960's and 70's. We have just resumed contact > after > an approximate 20 year lapse. I have talked to him about getting > documentation on Keith's grandfather William. The state of Iowa refused > to > let me have the death record as I was not a direct descendant. It is > amazing how some states don't care what my relationship, if any is, and > others want only a direct descendant to get a record. Unfortunately, > most > of my Kinkades were in states that don't post every vital record online! > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:42 AM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > > >> Margie is this kit #130404? >> I will need to know who is contact and have permission to put the e-mail >> address on the chart. >> >> We have had several new orders for tests in the last few days, at least >> some >> of which are long sought after lines. I am hoping that lineage and >> contact >> info will be available by the time the results are returned. I would be >> happy to send vetting formats to any who wish to start on that process. I >> am >> always happy to help (time permitting) anyone with organizing their >> information for clarity and to present the strongest arguement possible. >> Please contact me off list. seleaml@actionnet.net if you would like a >> format. Please include your kit number so I know for sure who I am >> talking >> with. >> >> Barb, thank you for your input on the vetting post for #11207 A-1b. I do >> appreciate all those that take the time to look through the posts and >> respond. It is so easy to miss something that may not be as clear as it >> should be. With many eyes tracing the line we are more likely to end up >> with >> solid links. Confirmation as well as questions are welcome contributions. >> >> Sue Liedtke >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> >> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:10 PM >> Subject: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate >> >> >>> Sue: The grandson of James Woodburn Kinkade's son William has agreed to >>> participate in the DNA Project. Keith Kinkade was an avid Kinkade >>> researcher in the 1960's and 1970's and was the driving force behind my >>> own >>> Kinkade research. I am working on ordering a 67 marker kit for him now. >>> Margie >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >>> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM >>> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle >>> >>> >>>> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern >>>> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too early >>>> to >>>> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a >>>> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 >>>> at >>>> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both >>>> mutations) >>>> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with >>>> further >>>> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the >>>> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor >>>> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's >>>> ancestor >>>> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another >>>> participant >>>> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would help >>>> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better >>>> picture >>>> of where he fits in. >>>> >>>> Sue Liedtke >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE SHOPKEEPER >>>>> OF >>>>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE >>>>> ALSO >>>>> TO >>>>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY >>>>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND >>>>> THIS: >>>> >>>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>> >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Rough Biography for Keith Kinkade's grandfather. Keith's DNA number is 130404 and the order was confirmed yesterday. Margie WILLIAM KINKADE was born on 28 May 1851 in Pennsylvania, the seventh of eight children of James Woodburn and Margaret Kuhns Kinkade. He was two months short of being three years old when his mother and infant brother died. His daughter Eva Mae wrote that her father only remembered his immediate family being orphaned at about nine years old and ushered out into the world to look out for himself. He turned out to be a fine Christian man but what a life! His father remarried and the family moved to Hancock County, Illinois. His first marriage was about 1878 to Emma White, who died in childbirth with her baby. Emma's parents are unknown; however, when she was 12 years old, she was living with the Charles Widger family in Fulton County, Illinois. In 1880 William married Clara Widger and they lived in Lincoln, Iowa. Clara was the daughter of Charles and Pheobe Morris Widger and was born on February 10, 1862. Census records conflict on her birthplace as either Illinois or Pennsylvania. They had two daughters (Amanda and Eva) and four sons (Elmer, Harvey, George and Frank). The family can be found in the 1885, 1895, 1900 and 1910 censuses in Douglas, Union County, Iowa. William was a farmer. Clara died in 1917 at the age of 55 years. William was 67 years old in the 1920 Union County Census. He was living with his third wife, Elizabeth, age 50. The couple lived next door to his son Harry Kinkade's family in Douglas Township. His obituary from the Creston Daily News was on the front page on Monday, June 1, 1925: William Kinkade Died At His Home Saturday. William Kinkade, a retired farmer, died at 9:30 Saturday morning at his home 211 South Myrtle street, after an illness of three weeks. He was 74 years of age and lived on a farm near Cromwell for many years before coming to Creston, to make his home. He is survived by his widow, and two daughters, Mrs. William Ours of Cromwell and Mrs. T. W. Drynan of Clyde Park, Mont., and four sons, E. E. and Harvey of Cromwell, George of Creston, and Frank of Chicago. The funeral will be held at 2:30 Tuesday afternoon at the home with Rev. Clyde Harris, pastor of the Congregational church, officiating and burial will take place in the Cromwell cemetery. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara Van Hout" <dutchtreat@prodigy.net> To: <Kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:26 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > Margie, > > I was able to trace this William Kinkade family back to Union County, > Iowa, > 1880-1930, > >1860 & 1870 Hancock Co, IL>1850 Westmoreland Co, PA>1840 Greene Co, PA-- > > In the 1840 Greene County, PA census, there was a James > Kincaid, JR. next to a William Kincaid, both a. 20-30 with wives a. > 20-30. > James had a son under a. 5. Do you know when James W. Kincaid married? > > The 1840 Greene Co, PA census shows a William Kincaid, Esq. > family, --large > family--with William a. 60-70 as the head. > > 1830 Greene County, PA shows a James Kincaid a. 40-50 with one male > a.15-20 > and one female a. 50-60. This younger male matches James W Kincaid's age, > but more research is needed in Greene county, PA. > > The William Kincaid, Esq. of 1840 Greene County doesn't show up in 1830 in > the Greene County census, according to ancestry.com's records. > > The 1820 and 1810 censuses for Bedford County, PA, Bethel Township, show a > James > Kincaid of the right age to be the father of James Kincaid, Jr of the 1840 > Greene County census. > In 1810 James didn't have a son, but in 1820 James had one son under age > 10. > > The early census information for Pennsylvania would need records to prove > everything and may be wrong on what I have found. > Just sending this because it may suggest counties for more research. > > Barbara > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 2:55 PM > Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > > >> My email address will be used for 130404; as well as 15550, which needs >> to >> be updated to dieckhorst@q.com). The actual contributor is Harry Keith >> Kinkade, b. 1929. Keith told me that he has macular degeneration and >> that >> is why he no longer does genealogy. He did all the early James Woodburn >> Kinkade research in the 1960's and 70's. We have just resumed contact >> after >> an approximate 20 year lapse. I have talked to him about getting >> documentation on Keith's grandfather William. The state of Iowa refused >> to >> let me have the death record as I was not a direct descendant. It is >> amazing how some states don't care what my relationship, if any is, and >> others want only a direct descendant to get a record. Unfortunately, >> most >> of my Kinkades were in states that don't post every vital record online! >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:42 AM >> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate >> >> >>> Margie is this kit #130404? >>> I will need to know who is contact and have permission to put the e-mail >>> address on the chart. >>> >>> We have had several new orders for tests in the last few days, at least >>> some >>> of which are long sought after lines. I am hoping that lineage and >>> contact >>> info will be available by the time the results are returned. I would be >>> happy to send vetting formats to any who wish to start on that process. >>> I >>> am >>> always happy to help (time permitting) anyone with organizing their >>> information for clarity and to present the strongest arguement possible. >>> Please contact me off list. seleaml@actionnet.net if you would like a >>> format. Please include your kit number so I know for sure who I am >>> talking >>> with. >>> >>> Barb, thank you for your input on the vetting post for #11207 A-1b. I do >>> appreciate all those that take the time to look through the posts and >>> respond. It is so easy to miss something that may not be as clear as it >>> should be. With many eyes tracing the line we are more likely to end up >>> with >>> solid links. Confirmation as well as questions are welcome >>> contributions. >>> >>> Sue Liedtke >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> >>> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >>> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:10 PM >>> Subject: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate >>> >>> >>>> Sue: The grandson of James Woodburn Kinkade's son William has agreed >>>> to >>>> participate in the DNA Project. Keith Kinkade was an avid Kinkade >>>> researcher in the 1960's and 1970's and was the driving force behind my >>>> own >>>> Kinkade research. I am working on ordering a 67 marker kit for him >>>> now. >>>> Margie >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >>>> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >>>> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle >>>> >>>> >>>>> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern >>>>> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too >>>>> early >>>>> to >>>>> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a >>>>> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 >>>>> at >>>>> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both >>>>> mutations) >>>>> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with >>>>> further >>>>> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the >>>>> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor >>>>> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's >>>>> ancestor >>>>> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another >>>>> participant >>>>> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would >>>>> help >>>>> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better >>>>> picture >>>>> of where he fits in. >>>>> >>>>> Sue Liedtke >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE >>>>>> SHOPKEEPER >>>>>> OF >>>>>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE >>>>>> ALSO >>>>>> TO >>>>>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY >>>>>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND >>>>>> THIS: >>>>> >>>>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>>>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>>>> >>>> >>>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

We see Margie's email has changed and thought this was a good time to remind Kincaid DNA participants to be sure and change their email address on their personal webpage with FTDNA when you change email address so that you will continue to receive notice of matches and etc. We look forward to Keith's results! Don W. Kincaid Kincaid Surname DNA Admin Team donwkincaid@cox.net 254 631-5684 ----- Original Message ----- From: Margie von Marenholtz To: kincaid@rootsweb.com Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 1:55 PM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate My email address will be used for 130404; as well as 15550, which needs to be updated to dieckhorst@q.com). The actual contributor is Harry Keith Kinkade, b. 1929. Keith told me that he has macular degeneration and that is why he no longer does genealogy. He did all the early James Woodburn Kinkade research in the 1960's and 70's. We have just resumed contact after an approximate 20 year lapse. I have talked to him about getting documentation on Keith's grandfather William. The state of Iowa refused to let me have the death record as I was not a direct descendant. It is amazing how some states don't care what my relationship, if any is, and others want only a direct descendant to get a record. Unfortunately, most of my Kinkades were in states that don't post every vital record online! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:42 AM Subject: Re: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > Margie is this kit #130404? > I will need to know who is contact and have permission to put the e-mail > address on the chart. > > We have had several new orders for tests in the last few days, at least > some > of which are long sought after lines. I am hoping that lineage and contact > info will be available by the time the results are returned. I would be > happy to send vetting formats to any who wish to start on that process. I > am > always happy to help (time permitting) anyone with organizing their > information for clarity and to present the strongest arguement possible. > Please contact me off list. seleaml@actionnet.net if you would like a > format. Please include your kit number so I know for sure who I am talking > with. > > Barb, thank you for your input on the vetting post for #11207 A-1b. I do > appreciate all those that take the time to look through the posts and > respond. It is so easy to miss something that may not be as clear as it > should be. With many eyes tracing the line we are more likely to end up > with > solid links. Confirmation as well as questions are welcome contributions. > > Sue Liedtke > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Margie von Marenholtz" <Dieckhorst@q.com> > To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 3:10 PM > Subject: [KINCAID] Another son of 15550 line to participate > > >> Sue: The grandson of James Woodburn Kinkade's son William has agreed to >> participate in the DNA Project. Keith Kinkade was an avid Kinkade >> researcher in the 1960's and 1970's and was the driving force behind my >> own >> Kinkade research. I am working on ordering a 67 marker kit for him now. >> Margie >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Sue Liedtke" <seleaml@actionnet.net> >> To: <kincaid@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 8:58 AM >> Subject: Re: [KINCAID] another John in Carlisle >> >> >>> In looking at the upgrade to 67 results, there is a possible pattern >>> emerging at marker 50 (413b) and marker 60 (446). It is still too early >>> to >>> tell and both markers seem to have a parallel mutation but there is a >>> possible path with the 22 at marker 50 occuring 1st followed by the 14 >>> at >>> marker 60. Set 4's line would take off from #2519 (who has both >>> mutations) >>> at marker 19 (437) with a mutation to 14. If the pattern holds with >>> further >>> upgrades this means that 15550 would not find a common ancestor in the >>> colonies with any current project participant as 2519's ancestor >>> Samuel/Johanna Walch was b 1811 and d 1885 in Ireland and 2519's >>> ancestor >>> James Woodburn/Margaret Kuhn's was also b 1811. Finding another >>> participant >>> from James Woodburn's line (preferably from a different son) would help >>> confirm or eliminate mutations within this line and give us a better >>> picture >>> of where he fits in. >>> >>> Sue Liedtke >>> >>> >>>> I'M NOT UP TO SNUFF ON THIS SINCE MY CONNECTION TO JOHN THE SHOPKEEPER >>>> OF >>>> CARLISLE APPEARS TO BE A FORLORN HOPE, BUT THIS JOHN IS OF THE AGE ALSO >>>> TO >>>> BE THE SHOPKEEPER'S GRANDSON THROUGH ANDREW. SO I LOOKED BACK AT MY >>>> RECORDS AND FOUND REFERENCE TO "DEBORAH" AS HIS WIFE, AND THEN FOUND >>>> THIS: >>> >>> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >>> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >> >> To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: >> http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > To see the Kincaid of all spellings DNA chart in Excel: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~adgedge/Research/April%202004/Kincaid%20%20DNA.xls ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to KINCAID-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Here is an e-mail from Brenda Kincaid Boen----she descends from the same Kincaid family as Sally Standley, DNA # #11207 A-1b, it appears. HENSLEY-KINCAID Seeking information on the HENSLEY and KINCAID (KINCADE) families who lived in Lewis and Maury County, Tennessee. I am descended from John Gabriel HENSLEY through their son Gabriel Perry HENSLEY and his son Lee Bentley HENSLEY. My grandparents were Theodore Bud KINCAID (son of Mary Catherine HENSLEY & Alexander KINCAID) and Lola Lee HENSLEY (daughter of Lee Bentley HENSLEY and Mary Caroline HIGGINS). I believe that John Gabriel's parents were William HENSLEY and Nancy GARDNER. Mary Catherine HENSLEY KINCAID married a second time to William Anderson SHARP. Brenda's family beginning with Alexander Kincaid: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com:80/~brendaboen/Our_Family/Kincaid/kincaid.html Alexander Kincade sold 174+acres in Lewis Co.TN to Robert J. Newsom 14 > July 1853. Property included a mill. No explanation of how 21 yr old > Alexander acquired the property. > 1850 Census Lewis Co. TN Civil Dist #5 August 29 > James Kincade 53 cabinet maker KY > Elizabeth 45 TN > James P 22 cabinet maker TN > Alexander 18 cabinet maker TN > Samuel B 17 cabinet maker TN > Elizabeth A 15 TN > Rufus A 13 TN > Sarah P 11 TN > Rachel C 8 TN > Martha E 4 TN > William L (sic T). 1 TN >