YEAH!!! Hey Vickie and Roy, did you hear that, WE ARE PERFECT!!! LOL Vickie had said before that she thought we were closely connected to Thomas... She is right on!!! Thanks, John and Jack. I like to see great minds work!!! smiles Sherry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack R. Templeton" <jacktempleton27@me.com> To: <kilgore@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 11:22 AM Subject: [KILGORE] Kilgore-Genetic Distance Table > John, > Thanks so much for your tables, especially your Genetic Distance > Table. I'm hoping to figure out how to hook up my printer so I can > create a hard copy easier than hand copying. I manually modified your > table to include only genetic distances 1 thru 4 & then color coded > each one. My next chore is to modify your "Generations to TMRCA" to > include only generations 4 thru 13 which will permit me to visualize a > rough guestimate of yrs to TMRCA. Your tables are making me think > outside the box. > > You're absolutely right that: > (1) Thos (151270) is closer to Chas (1740) than he is to either of the > James' (1760) > (2) You're also right on that Henry (131072) should probably be in the > Thos/Rebeca line rather than the James W. line > > Sherry, > You're reading the table right. 134024 & 134403 have a zero genetic > distance;i.e, they are a perfect match. > > Jack T. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > KILGORE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >