Linda sent this to me privately - I can't help with pre-1800 records, so am reposting her reply in the hope that someone else can. I did try to forward her message to the list but it appeeared as a blank - apologies. List Administrator - is it possible to have replies sent to the list as default, rather than to the originator of the posting ? That way, we all share information and we know what others have discovered and don't repeat what's already been found. Anne South Australia > William marr Rosmond Benge It John Born 1815 that we are trying to prove was their son and john born > 1839/1840 is John son sory I did not make it clear thank you ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anne Chambers" <anne.chambers@bigpond.com> To: "Linda Lambkin" <lclambkin@shaw.ca> Cc: <KENT-ENG@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:38 PM Subject: Re: [KENT-ENG] JOHN LAMKIN > I'm not sure what you mean. What dates/information do you have for William and Rosmond (presumably > Rosamond)- are they husband and wife or brother and sister ? > > a Rosamond Lambkin married in 1839 Marriages Dec 1839 LAMBKIN Rosamond Tunbridge 5 617 possibly to a > William HODGES > > a John Lamkin married in 1863 Marriages Mar 1863 LAMKIN John Brighton 2b 280 possibly to Mary Ann CARTER > > In the 1851 census there is a Rose Lamkin b Marden ca 1787 married to William and living in Marden > > In 1881, there is a Rose Lamkin b ca 1878 in Portslade Sussex, parents John and Mary Ann, living in > Portslade. > > Anne South Australia > > > Linda Lambkin wrote: >> Hi We are need help with this family. John Lamkin born 1839-1840 marr mary ann John father may have >> been John Born 1815 We need to comfirm if they are William and Rosmond family They are from Marden and >> bapt At St. Micheals and All Angles church. Any help woudl be a great help with this family and we thank >> you Lambkin family Canada >> >> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> KENT-ENG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body >> of the message >> >