I have a map which will tell you what you need but cannot send as attachment to the list. It is in a PDF format and if you send me an email I will reply with attachment . Tom M............. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beverley Ferrell" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [KELLEY] JAMES KELLY Natchez District, 1796 > Reply. I may be inclined to think it was in MS at that time. > Natchez, Natchitoches Co., LA was formed in 1805. In 1785 Natchez > Region was in MS territory. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nan Hlavaz" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 3:45 PM > Subject: Re: [KELLEY] JAMES KELLY Natchez District, 1796 > > >>I do believe it is not too far from New Orleans >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Richard Eklund" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 9:46 AM >> Subject: Re: [KELLEY] JAMES KELLY Natchez District, 1796 >> >> >>> Linda, >>> Thanks for the information. Could you narrow this down to where the >> Natchez >>> District is located? My assumption that it is somewhere in the >>> United >>> States. >>> Thanks, >>> Rick Eklund >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:31 AM >>> Subject: [KELLEY] JAMES KELLY Natchez District, 1796 >>> >>> >>> > Hi All, >>> > >>> > This is not a person I am connected to, but while researching, I >>> > located >>> > some >>> > KELLY info: >>> > >>> > (Quote) >>> > p. 510 JAMES KELLY versus JOHN LANIER. JAMES represents that >>> > JOHN >> LANIER >>> > claims that JAMES KELLY killed a beef that was not his own; asks >>> > that >>> > LANIER be >>> > punished for an attempt to hurt the reputation of the petitioner, >>> > who >>> > luckily >>> > had several witnesses present when he killed the said beef, who >>> > can >>> > testify >>> > that it was the petitioner's brand and no other. >>> > >>> > Witnesses: DANIEL STRICKLAND, JOHN LOCKHART, JOHN REED, JAMES >>> > McILHANEY >> & >>> > JOHN KEETING. 14 Sept. 1796. Signed JAMES KELLY // ISAAC >>> > JOHNSON, Esq. >>> > will >>> > take cognizance of this matter and make inquiry. Sig: GAYOSO.// >>> > Second >>> > Creek. >>> > >>> > >>> > Deposition of JOHN LANIER and above-named witnesses, also WILLIAM >>> > RATCLIFF, >>> > JAMES IRWIN, WILLIAM ALEXANDER, MARTHA KEETING, CHARLES REED, >>> > SOLOMON H. >>> > WISDOM. // Whereas the evidences produced were against the >>> > petitioner, >> he >>> > is proved >>> > guilty of charge and he is to remain in confinement for eight days >>> > time, >>> > within which he is to produce what he has to allege in his favor. >>> > Sig: >>> > GAYOSO >>> > (End of Quote) >>> > >>> > Source: >>> > The Natchez Court Records, 1767-1805, Natchez Court Records, >>> > 1781-1798, >>> > Page >>> > 288 >>> > >>> > Hope this helps someone, >>> > Linda Cashen Gaunt >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > ==== KELLEY Mailing List ==== >>> > Become a participant in the KELLEY/KELLY DNA Project: >>> > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/kelley/#results >>> > >>> >>> >>> ==== KELLEY Mailing List ==== >>> Who is your "Most Wanted" KELLEY/KELLY Ancestor? Nearly 600 >>> subscribers >> are waiting to read your message. We'd like to hear your *success* >> story, >> too. It will give the rest of us some HOPE! :D >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ==== KELLEY Mailing List ==== >> TO UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a message to [email protected] (or >> if you receive the DIGEST, send the message to: >> [email protected]) with only one word in the body of the >> message: UNSUBSCRIBE >> >> > > > > ==== KELLEY Mailing List ==== > New folks are joining the list everyday. Have you posted your > KELLEY/KELLY research problem recently? > >