What possible connection is there between Virginia making a stupid mistake about old documents and the crisis that the president is involved in. Do you think Osama and Saddam would preserve our historical documents -- or our lives for that matter. Stay on the subject and stop putting it on someone else's doorstep. Washington, District of Columbia, is not in Virginia and has little to do with state and local decisions like this one. -----Original Message----- From: nancy4 [mailto:nancy4@cottoninternet.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:08 PM To: JONES-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES Jean: I agree with you about the documents. The president is busy with his war toys. ----- Original Message ----- From: "JEAN PAYTON" <jeanpayton@earthlink.net> To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:27 PM Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > That is what we are trying to stop from doing. Its fine to microfilm them > but to destroy the originals would be a very costly mistake. The State of > Virginia by allowing this destruction to happen is destroying a very > important historical documents that date back to the 1600s when people first > started to arrive in the New World. > > What I don't understand is why they won't donate them to the historical > Society, Library of Virginia, or to other Genealogical Societies. Simply > the lack of storage is a very poor excuse for destroyng these documents. > Massachusetts has just as much historical papers and they haven't threatened > to destroy for lack of space. > > Microfilming them is not always a cost effective way of retaining these > histroical documents. When they are microfilmed people who do this often > make mistakes. They don't photograph them properly, they miss pages, and > sometimes destroy the whole document in the process. Look at some of the > Census records we have. Some of them you can't read from the microfilm, > some of them have black splotches on their lens which transfer to the films. > Historic Wills that date back 400 yrs are hard to read in the immediate > copy. If they are hard to read in their original state microfiming will > just make it harder to read. > > If we the people let these States do these things because they lack space we > stand to lose a very important part of our history and heritage. Our > ancestors when writing their last testant and will wrote them with the idea > of protecting their families and heirs and leaving a piece of history when > they were gone. > > It is just the State of Virginia,but there is the State of Florida who want > to do away with their State Library which houses all of their important and > historical documents, The state of Washington is another state who wants to > do away with their historical documentation. We are the family researchers > must ban together and let our government know that these are precious > records that should be retained for ever not thrown away because they lack > storage. The least they could do is to offer them to the Genealogical > Societues or have them transcribed and put online for the world to see. > > One prime example of retaining these documents is to be able to prove who > were the heirs. I was trying to connect my Spencer line and I was missing > the name of one son. When I thought I had the rright father I was told that > he didn't have a son named John. Well when I found the will in New York he > indeed did have a son John which connected my line from the First Spencers > to come to the New Wolrd. Without that will I would have been still looking > for the connection. > > So yes we all need to let the Senators, Delegates, Congressman, and our > President know that these papers are very important to all of the people of > the United States not just that state. We need to make sure they retain > these copies. I don't understand how they can lack for storage space nor > the money to fund these records when they can vote themselve huge wage > increases as they did this past year and then complain they don't have the > money to continue restoration or continue to keep these documents available > to the World. > Jean Payton > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "BILL & KARLI DYE" <bdye@tcac.net> > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:30 PM > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > Thanks, I read what the summary was. Appreciate you giving me the > > directions. > > > > Does that mean that as long as the wills are microfilmed then they can be > > destroyed -- like it says in the last line? > > > > Karli > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <Jnshowl@aol.com> > > > Wish this was a hoax. Go to the link below > > > http://legis.state.va.us/ > > > and type in this bill number SB818 > > > Jackie Howell > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > site: > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at jones-admin@rootsweb.com For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones search the archives: http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES Unusual JONES given names, http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003

I know where you stand. The mention was to let the president know about the bill and this was my reply. Someone else mentioned him and I took the opportunity. Get your bleach ready for attacks and duck tape and plastic. Good message. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brenda Overstreet" <stonephoenix@earthlink.net> To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM Subject: RE: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > What possible connection is there between Virginia making a stupid mistake > about old documents and the crisis that the president is involved in. > Do you think Osama and Saddam would preserve our historical documents -- or > our lives for that matter. > Stay on the subject and stop putting it on someone else's doorstep. > Washington, District of Columbia, is not in Virginia and has little to do > with state and local decisions like this one. > > -----Original Message----- > From: nancy4 [mailto:nancy4@cottoninternet.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:08 PM > To: JONES-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > Jean: > I agree with you about the documents. The president is busy with his war > toys. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JEAN PAYTON" <jeanpayton@earthlink.net> > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:27 PM > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > That is what we are trying to stop from doing. Its fine to microfilm them > > but to destroy the originals would be a very costly mistake. The State of > > Virginia by allowing this destruction to happen is destroying a very > > important historical documents that date back to the 1600s when people > first > > started to arrive in the New World. > > > > What I don't understand is why they won't donate them to the historical > > Society, Library of Virginia, or to other Genealogical Societies. Simply > > the lack of storage is a very poor excuse for destroyng these documents. > > Massachusetts has just as much historical papers and they haven't > threatened > > to destroy for lack of space. > > > > Microfilming them is not always a cost effective way of retaining these > > histroical documents. When they are microfilmed people who do this often > > make mistakes. They don't photograph them properly, they miss pages, and > > sometimes destroy the whole document in the process. Look at some of the > > Census records we have. Some of them you can't read from the microfilm, > > some of them have black splotches on their lens which transfer to the > films. > > Historic Wills that date back 400 yrs are hard to read in the immediate > > copy. If they are hard to read in their original state microfiming will > > just make it harder to read. > > > > If we the people let these States do these things because they lack space > we > > stand to lose a very important part of our history and heritage. Our > > ancestors when writing their last testant and will wrote them with the > idea > > of protecting their families and heirs and leaving a piece of history when > > they were gone. > > > > It is just the State of Virginia,but there is the State of Florida who > want > > to do away with their State Library which houses all of their important > and > > historical documents, The state of Washington is another state who wants > to > > do away with their historical documentation. We are the family > researchers > > must ban together and let our government know that these are precious > > records that should be retained for ever not thrown away because they lack > > storage. The least they could do is to offer them to the Genealogical > > Societues or have them transcribed and put online for the world to see. > > > > One prime example of retaining these documents is to be able to prove who > > were the heirs. I was trying to connect my Spencer line and I was missing > > the name of one son. When I thought I had the rright father I was told > that > > he didn't have a son named John. Well when I found the will in New York > he > > indeed did have a son John which connected my line from the First Spencers > > to come to the New Wolrd. Without that will I would have been still > looking > > for the connection. > > > > So yes we all need to let the Senators, Delegates, Congressman, and our > > President know that these papers are very important to all of the people > of > > the United States not just that state. We need to make sure they retain > > these copies. I don't understand how they can lack for storage space nor > > the money to fund these records when they can vote themselve huge wage > > increases as they did this past year and then complain they don't have the > > money to continue restoration or continue to keep these documents > available > > to the World. > > Jean Payton > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "BILL & KARLI DYE" <bdye@tcac.net> > > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > > > > Thanks, I read what the summary was. Appreciate you giving me the > > > directions. > > > > > > Does that mean that as long as the wills are microfilmed then they can > be > > > destroyed -- like it says in the last line? > > > > > > Karli > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <Jnshowl@aol.com> > > > > Wish this was a hoax. Go to the link below > > > > http://legis.state.va.us/ > > > > and type in this bill number SB818 > > > > Jackie Howell > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > > site: > > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > > search the archives: > > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > > Unusual JONES given names, > > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > site: > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > >

Brenda: There are now missiles around the white house. Look at the news on the internet. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brenda Overstreet" <stonephoenix@earthlink.net> To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 2:22 PM Subject: RE: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > What possible connection is there between Virginia making a stupid mistake > about old documents and the crisis that the president is involved in. > Do you think Osama and Saddam would preserve our historical documents -- or > our lives for that matter. > Stay on the subject and stop putting it on someone else's doorstep. > Washington, District of Columbia, is not in Virginia and has little to do > with state and local decisions like this one. > > -----Original Message----- > From: nancy4 [mailto:nancy4@cottoninternet.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:08 PM > To: JONES-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > Jean: > I agree with you about the documents. The president is busy with his war > toys. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JEAN PAYTON" <jeanpayton@earthlink.net> > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:27 PM > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > That is what we are trying to stop from doing. Its fine to microfilm them > > but to destroy the originals would be a very costly mistake. The State of > > Virginia by allowing this destruction to happen is destroying a very > > important historical documents that date back to the 1600s when people > first > > started to arrive in the New World. > > > > What I don't understand is why they won't donate them to the historical > > Society, Library of Virginia, or to other Genealogical Societies. Simply > > the lack of storage is a very poor excuse for destroyng these documents. > > Massachusetts has just as much historical papers and they haven't > threatened > > to destroy for lack of space. > > > > Microfilming them is not always a cost effective way of retaining these > > histroical documents. When they are microfilmed people who do this often > > make mistakes. They don't photograph them properly, they miss pages, and > > sometimes destroy the whole document in the process. Look at some of the > > Census records we have. Some of them you can't read from the microfilm, > > some of them have black splotches on their lens which transfer to the > films. > > Historic Wills that date back 400 yrs are hard to read in the immediate > > copy. If they are hard to read in their original state microfiming will > > just make it harder to read. > > > > If we the people let these States do these things because they lack space > we > > stand to lose a very important part of our history and heritage. Our > > ancestors when writing their last testant and will wrote them with the > idea > > of protecting their families and heirs and leaving a piece of history when > > they were gone. > > > > It is just the State of Virginia,but there is the State of Florida who > want > > to do away with their State Library which houses all of their important > and > > historical documents, The state of Washington is another state who wants > to > > do away with their historical documentation. We are the family > researchers > > must ban together and let our government know that these are precious > > records that should be retained for ever not thrown away because they lack > > storage. The least they could do is to offer them to the Genealogical > > Societues or have them transcribed and put online for the world to see. > > > > One prime example of retaining these documents is to be able to prove who > > were the heirs. I was trying to connect my Spencer line and I was missing > > the name of one son. When I thought I had the rright father I was told > that > > he didn't have a son named John. Well when I found the will in New York > he > > indeed did have a son John which connected my line from the First Spencers > > to come to the New Wolrd. Without that will I would have been still > looking > > for the connection. > > > > So yes we all need to let the Senators, Delegates, Congressman, and our > > President know that these papers are very important to all of the people > of > > the United States not just that state. We need to make sure they retain > > these copies. I don't understand how they can lack for storage space nor > > the money to fund these records when they can vote themselve huge wage > > increases as they did this past year and then complain they don't have the > > money to continue restoration or continue to keep these documents > available > > to the World. > > Jean Payton > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "BILL & KARLI DYE" <bdye@tcac.net> > > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > > > > Thanks, I read what the summary was. Appreciate you giving me the > > > directions. > > > > > > Does that mean that as long as the wills are microfilmed then they can > be > > > destroyed -- like it says in the last line? > > > > > > Karli > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <Jnshowl@aol.com> > > > > Wish this was a hoax. Go to the link below > > > > http://legis.state.va.us/ > > > > and type in this bill number SB818 > > > > Jackie Howell > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > > site: > > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > > search the archives: > > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > > Unusual JONES given names, > > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > site: > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > >

What can we do to help fight the destruction of these old documents? Thanks Shelia ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brenda Overstreet" <stonephoenix@earthlink.net> To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: RE: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > What possible connection is there between Virginia making a stupid mistake > about old documents and the crisis that the president is involved in. > Do you think Osama and Saddam would preserve our historical documents -- or > our lives for that matter. > Stay on the subject and stop putting it on someone else's doorstep. > Washington, District of Columbia, is not in Virginia and has little to do > with state and local decisions like this one. > > -----Original Message----- > From: nancy4 [mailto:nancy4@cottoninternet.net] > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:08 PM > To: JONES-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > Jean: > I agree with you about the documents. The president is busy with his war > toys. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JEAN PAYTON" <jeanpayton@earthlink.net> > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:27 PM > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > That is what we are trying to stop from doing. Its fine to microfilm them > > but to destroy the originals would be a very costly mistake. The State of > > Virginia by allowing this destruction to happen is destroying a very > > important historical documents that date back to the 1600s when people > first > > started to arrive in the New World. > > > > What I don't understand is why they won't donate them to the historical > > Society, Library of Virginia, or to other Genealogical Societies. Simply > > the lack of storage is a very poor excuse for destroyng these documents. > > Massachusetts has just as much historical papers and they haven't > threatened > > to destroy for lack of space. > > > > Microfilming them is not always a cost effective way of retaining these > > histroical documents. When they are microfilmed people who do this often > > make mistakes. They don't photograph them properly, they miss pages, and > > sometimes destroy the whole document in the process. Look at some of the > > Census records we have. Some of them you can't read from the microfilm, > > some of them have black splotches on their lens which transfer to the > films. > > Historic Wills that date back 400 yrs are hard to read in the immediate > > copy. If they are hard to read in their original state microfiming will > > just make it harder to read. > > > > If we the people let these States do these things because they lack space > we > > stand to lose a very important part of our history and heritage. Our > > ancestors when writing their last testant and will wrote them with the > idea > > of protecting their families and heirs and leaving a piece of history when > > they were gone. > > > > It is just the State of Virginia,but there is the State of Florida who > want > > to do away with their State Library which houses all of their important > and > > historical documents, The state of Washington is another state who wants > to > > do away with their historical documentation. We are the family > researchers > > must ban together and let our government know that these are precious > > records that should be retained for ever not thrown away because they lack > > storage. The least they could do is to offer them to the Genealogical > > Societues or have them transcribed and put online for the world to see. > > > > One prime example of retaining these documents is to be able to prove who > > were the heirs. I was trying to connect my Spencer line and I was missing > > the name of one son. When I thought I had the rright father I was told > that > > he didn't have a son named John. Well when I found the will in New York > he > > indeed did have a son John which connected my line from the First Spencers > > to come to the New Wolrd. Without that will I would have been still > looking > > for the connection. > > > > So yes we all need to let the Senators, Delegates, Congressman, and our > > President know that these papers are very important to all of the people > of > > the United States not just that state. We need to make sure they retain > > these copies. I don't understand how they can lack for storage space nor > > the money to fund these records when they can vote themselve huge wage > > increases as they did this past year and then complain they don't have the > > money to continue restoration or continue to keep these documents > available > > to the World. > > Jean Payton > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "BILL & KARLI DYE" <bdye@tcac.net> > > To: <JONES-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 6:30 PM > > Subject: Re: [Jones] VIRGINIA SENATE BILL DESTRUCTION OF WILL FILES > > > > > > > Thanks, I read what the summary was. Appreciate you giving me the > > > directions. > > > > > > Does that mean that as long as the wills are microfilmed then they can > be > > > destroyed -- like it says in the last line? > > > > > > Karli > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <Jnshowl@aol.com> > > > > Wish this was a hoax. Go to the link below > > > > http://legis.state.va.us/ > > > > and type in this bill number SB818 > > > > Jackie Howell > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > > site: > > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > > search the archives: > > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > > Unusual JONES given names, > > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this > site: > > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > > > > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at > jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: > http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, > http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/2003 > > > ==== JONES Mailing List ==== > Direct your questions, comments or problems to the listowner at jones-admin@rootsweb.com > For detailed instructions on subscribing and unsubscribing visit this site: > http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/surname/j/jones.html > browse the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/jones > search the archives: http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=JONES > Unusual JONES given names, http://members.aol.com/stjones/jones/oddnames.html >