RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 100/1720
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search
    2. Judy
    3. You must go through the links I provided http://www.nanations.com/ or http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/ That is the only way you get the free screens. Judy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Inez and Jerry" <jerrynez@centurytel.net> To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search > Judy, I tried logging in to the 1900 census and I get the page for signing > up for ancestry.com for a year or a quarter. What am I doing wrong? > > Inez > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Sandi Carter > To: IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:41 PM > Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search > > > Native American Nations in cooperation with Ancestry and > AccessGenealogy > is proud to provide our visitors the complete 1900 census FREE until 15 > December 2005! This includes both the every name index and all census > images. To view this census, you do not need an Ancestry membership, > nor > do you need to provide your credit card details. All you need to > provide > is your email address and your name! > > Native American research for the 20th century has been buoyed by the > inclusion of all Native Americans in the 1900 census. Whether > enumerated > within the Indian Territory, or enumerated on the many reservations > spread out across the United States, Native Americans were finally > being > counted. This provides the researcher a great and mostly unused tool in > the search for their Native American ancestors. Finding these Native > Americans has gotten a lot easier with Ancestry's recent indexing of > the > 1900 census. While the index is complete, it's not perfect. The writing > of some enumerators was poor, and the quality of some census pages is > lacking. While you can search first, be prepared to browse their census > images keeping the following tips in mind: > > Most Indian schedules were added to the end of county listings. For > some > states however, the Indian schedules were added to the end of the > state. > > > A non-Indian MAY be enumerated on the Indian schedule, if they were > detached from their family and living with an Indian family. > > A Native American MAY be enumerated on the general population schedule, > if they were detached from their Indian family and living with a white, > or black family. > > For their own personal reasons, many Native Americans failed to claim > their heritage during the 1900 census... they ended up enumerated as > white or black. As well, some whites and blacks listed themselves as > Indian, when they were in fact, not. While the 1900 census in and of > itself does not prove or disprove your Native American history, it can > add yet one more fact in favor, or not in favor of that claim. > > The census being opened up to NANations and AccessGenealogy is not > limited to just the section for the Native Americans, it is the > COMPLETE > 1900 census index and images, and all are free... you just need your > name and email to login. > > Good luck! > > http://www.nanations.com/ > > To further your Native American research check out AccessGenealogy's > extensive Native American rolls, and smaller census listings... > > http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/ > > Please feel free to pass this on to friends, family and other lists. > > Judy > > > > > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== > To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to > IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or > to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to > > ============================== > View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find > marriage announcements and more. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: > 12/1/2005 > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== > To unsubscribe, please send the command "unsubscribe" to > IT-INDIAN-L-request@rootsweb.com (if in mail mode) or > IT-INDIAN-D-request@rootsweb.com (if in digest mode.) > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx >

    12/02/2005 08:21:19
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search
    2. Inez and Jerry
    3. Judy, I tried logging in to the 1900 census and I get the page for signing up for ancestry.com for a year or a quarter. What am I doing wrong? Inez ----- Original Message ----- From: Sandi Carter To: IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:41 PM Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search Native American Nations in cooperation with Ancestry and AccessGenealogy is proud to provide our visitors the complete 1900 census FREE until 15 December 2005! This includes both the every name index and all census images. To view this census, you do not need an Ancestry membership, nor do you need to provide your credit card details. All you need to provide is your email address and your name! Native American research for the 20th century has been buoyed by the inclusion of all Native Americans in the 1900 census. Whether enumerated within the Indian Territory, or enumerated on the many reservations spread out across the United States, Native Americans were finally being counted. This provides the researcher a great and mostly unused tool in the search for their Native American ancestors. Finding these Native Americans has gotten a lot easier with Ancestry's recent indexing of the 1900 census. While the index is complete, it's not perfect. The writing of some enumerators was poor, and the quality of some census pages is lacking. While you can search first, be prepared to browse their census images keeping the following tips in mind: Most Indian schedules were added to the end of county listings. For some states however, the Indian schedules were added to the end of the state. A non-Indian MAY be enumerated on the Indian schedule, if they were detached from their family and living with an Indian family. A Native American MAY be enumerated on the general population schedule, if they were detached from their Indian family and living with a white, or black family. For their own personal reasons, many Native Americans failed to claim their heritage during the 1900 census... they ended up enumerated as white or black. As well, some whites and blacks listed themselves as Indian, when they were in fact, not. While the 1900 census in and of itself does not prove or disprove your Native American history, it can add yet one more fact in favor, or not in favor of that claim. The census being opened up to NANations and AccessGenealogy is not limited to just the section for the Native Americans, it is the COMPLETE 1900 census index and images, and all are free... you just need your name and email to login. Good luck! http://www.nanations.com/ To further your Native American research check out AccessGenealogy's extensive Native American rolls, and smaller census listings... http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/ Please feel free to pass this on to friends, family and other lists. Judy ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to ============================== View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find marriage announcements and more. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.10/190 - Release Date: 12/1/2005

    12/02/2005 07:21:57
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search
    2. Sandi Carter
    3. --- Michael Carter <sherman_texas@yahoo.com> wrote: > On any search you do in Ancestry.com if you can not find your people you are looking for try > Variation's of there last name. Census takers apparently were not hired for there penmanship > and spelling ability. Michael: Thanks for the extra hints in researching the census records! Good luck all! Best, Sandi Carter

    12/02/2005 03:10:05
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Native American Nations free Ancestry search
    2. Michael Carter
    3. When searching on the 1900 census at Ancestry.com, search Indian Territory not just Oklahoma both options are available for the 1900 census. Also remember do not take every you find on the Census as the whole truth, I have people with different birthdates than what is listed on the 1900 Census. For those who are planning on buying a subscription to Ancestry.com. On the 1910 Census when searching for Native Americans enter Last name in the First name box and enter Indian in the Last name box. Such as Keel Indian, this will give you all indexed Native American Keel's. You can also enter in just the First name and use Indian as the Last. Such as George Indian, this would give you all George's who are Native American. On any search you do in Ancestry.com if you can not find your people you are looking for try Variation's of there last name. Census takers apparently were not hired for there penmanship and spelling ability. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Shopping Find Great Deals on Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping

    12/01/2005 10:11:30
    1. Native American Nations free Ancestry search
    2. Sandi Carter
    3. Native American Nations in cooperation with Ancestry and AccessGenealogy is proud to provide our visitors the complete 1900 census FREE until 15 December 2005! This includes both the every name index and all census images. To view this census, you do not need an Ancestry membership, nor do you need to provide your credit card details. All you need to provide is your email address and your name! Native American research for the 20th century has been buoyed by the inclusion of all Native Americans in the 1900 census. Whether enumerated within the Indian Territory, or enumerated on the many reservations spread out across the United States, Native Americans were finally being counted. This provides the researcher a great and mostly unused tool in the search for their Native American ancestors. Finding these Native Americans has gotten a lot easier with Ancestry's recent indexing of the 1900 census. While the index is complete, it's not perfect. The writing of some enumerators was poor, and the quality of some census pages is lacking. While you can search first, be prepared to browse their census images keeping the following tips in mind: Most Indian schedules were added to the end of county listings. For some states however, the Indian schedules were added to the end of the state. A non-Indian MAY be enumerated on the Indian schedule, if they were detached from their family and living with an Indian family. A Native American MAY be enumerated on the general population schedule, if they were detached from their Indian family and living with a white, or black family. For their own personal reasons, many Native Americans failed to claim their heritage during the 1900 census... they ended up enumerated as white or black. As well, some whites and blacks listed themselves as Indian, when they were in fact, not. While the 1900 census in and of itself does not prove or disprove your Native American history, it can add yet one more fact in favor, or not in favor of that claim. The census being opened up to NANations and AccessGenealogy is not limited to just the section for the Native Americans, it is the COMPLETE 1900 census index and images, and all are free... you just need your name and email to login. Good luck! http://www.nanations.com/ To further your Native American research check out AccessGenealogy's extensive Native American rolls, and smaller census listings... http://www.accessgenealogy.com/native/ Please feel free to pass this on to friends, family and other lists. Judy

    12/01/2005 01:41:14
    1. Fwd: Re: IT-Chat-L
    2. Sandi Carter
    3. Please reply to Viol privately as she is not a member of this list. Thanks, Sandi --- Viola Seward <lolav@localnet.com> wrote: > From: "Viola Seward" <lolav@localnet.com> > To: "Sandi Carter" <redfox5@sbcglobal.net> > Subject: Re: IT-Chat-L > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 13:57:06 -0600 > > Hello Sandi. Searching for Mary Landry. Mary most likely a baptism name. > Mary was born in new caledonia which i was told is now around vancouver. > Well poor Mary had the misfortune of marrying my gggggrandfather Duncan > McDougall!! Had daughter Catherine in 1818. and lived in james bay. Duncan > married three native women and had children with each one yet denied all the > children. Tho he goofed up in his will and said " If any thing is left he > would like it to go to his daughter in james bay". But his only son george > got most every thing. George was son to nancy Hester and had a sister Ann > with same mom. Think Ilchee daughter of chinook chief Comcomly was wife > number one with whom he had a son Caleb.Any one else on list searching > Landry? > Thank you. > Viola. > >

    11/12/2005 12:06:48
    1. Fwd: Genealogy research
    2. Sandi Carter
    3. Please respond to Robert privately as he is not a member of this list. Thanks, Sandi --- Robert Riedel <r3737b@bellsouth.net> wrote: > Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:51:55 -0700 > From: "Robert Riedel" <r3737b@bellsouth.net> > To: <it-indian-l-request@rootsweb.com> > Subject: Genealogy research > > Hello, > > I am Robert Riedel. My wife is Burmah Riedel. Her Maiden name is Burmah > Ginger. Her Father is James Donald Ginger. Her Grandfather was Wiley Ginger > born 18 Jan 1885 and married Mary Sandra McCarver. I do not know who Wiley > Gingers mother was but she was born in the Indian Territory of Oklahoma. It > is said that she was a Chief's daughter but this is not proven as of yet. > > I am trying to find out what was Wiley Ginger's mother's maiden name. It > is believed that she was of Cherokee descent. Wiley was married to Mary > McCarver in Welty Oklahoma, County of Okfuskee, on 1 July 1911. > > Any information would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, > > > > > > Robert Riedel > > >

    11/12/2005 12:02:22
    1. Re:Broughton, Stewart and Edwards
    2. I am looking for connections to ancestors of the following: James Broughton who was bn 1803 Ga, He was in Jefferson Co,Ga in 1827 when he married Theodochia Stewart. They migrated to Russell Co,Al by 1840. Their Daughter Maryann Broughton bn 1837 Ga married Eben Peyton Edwards bn 1835 NC. Eben's parents were Benjamin Edwards bn 1808 Ga who married Lydia Stewart and Lydia A M Johns {I am not sure if they were one and the same or not}. I have the Edwards line back to 1600's but am stuck on Broughton line. So far I haven't been able to connect him to any of the Broughton's in SC,NC,GA and AL. So I thought maybe there could be an American Indian Connection??? I could use some help. Family tradition states there was an Indian Connection but i can't discover where or when. My Husband's mother was the source, but we never really talked about it, which is sad. I am older and wiser now but too late. Thanks Betty Rackley Taylor

    10/23/2005 08:04:17
    1. Fw: [IT-INDIAN] Checotah Enquirer March1,1901
    2. McIntosh County, OkGenWeb
    3. you may have received it from more than one list.......I did NOT receive it back at all........ ----- Original Message ----- From: Edna Montgomery To: IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 9:40 PM Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Checotah Enquirer March1,1901 I recieved the message from "Lee & Shelly Lynch" 5 times . ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== To unsubscribe, please send the command "unsubscribe" to IT-INDIAN-L-request@rootsweb.com (if in mail mode) or IT-INDIAN-D-request@rootsweb.com (if in digest mode.) ============================== Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx

    10/23/2005 03:45:28
    1. Checotah Enquirer March1,1901
    2. Edna Montgomery
    3. I recieved the message from "Lee & Shelly Lynch" 5 times .

    10/22/2005 03:40:24
    1. Checotah Enquirer March 1, 1901
    2. Lee & Shelley Lynch
    3. Subject: Checotah Enquirer March 1, 1901 some fact taken from the Checotah Enquirer dated March 1, 1901 a.. Rhedus Haws-Charged with Murder b.. Mr. & Mrs. H. B. Cobben return to Springfield, Mo. c.. Mrs. Melinda Heard-last surviving pensions of the Seminole war of 1836 d.. John A. Heard-Sergeant of Capt Jones Company. e.. Bassit G. Rossington-Please Guilty to Fraud f.. Red Cloud Brown killed in 1898 by the men below g.. Jim Waters-Given life sentence for killing h.. Jim Naked Head-witness for state i.. Watt Feather- j.. Arch Bullett-Died in Prison before trial k.. Dave Bird-Acquitted l.. Complete and accurate text of the NEW CREEK AGREEMENT m.. ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx

    10/22/2005 02:29:13
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Angel family
    2. Kim and J.C. Young
    3. Thanks, I will. Kim Labeth Myers <labethmyers@msn.com> wrote: Kim, Kosoma was in Pushmataha Co OK. Also, check out Elijah E. Angel and see if this is the Lige you are looking for in MO and OK. LaBeth ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

    10/16/2005 12:10:21
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Angel family
    2. Susan Reynolds
    3. Hi, Beth I found Kim's family. Elijah E. was his cousin, not his father. I believe his father is William R., his grandfather Anderson and great grandfather another Elijah. I haven't heard back from Kim, so I don't know if she got the information. Sterling's wife was Cherokee and her family is on the Dawes Roll. I would be happy to post what I found if anyone else is interested. The brick that knocked it all down was finding Sterling as Sterly Engles in the household of William Gardner in 1900. I was able to trace William back on the census to find his sister Isabella. It was a very entertaining search! Blessings! Susan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Labeth Myers" <labethmyers@msn.com> To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 4:46 PM Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Angel family > Kim, Kosoma was in Pushmataha Co OK. Also, > check out Elijah E. Angel and see if this is > the Lige you are looking for in MO and OK. > LaBeth > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== >

    10/15/2005 12:21:56
    1. Angel family
    2. Labeth Myers
    3. Kim, Kosoma was in Pushmataha Co OK. Also, check out Elijah E. Angel and see if this is the Lige you are looking for in MO and OK. LaBeth

    10/15/2005 10:46:14
    1. Genealogy on Sterling A Angel--Oklahoma
    2. Kim and J.C. Young
    3. My grandfather was Sterling A Angel and was born on June 22, 1889 in Kosoma, Oklahoma. He was married in Antlers, OK on Dec 22, 1913. He married Bertha M Bryant. He was living in Kiamichi, OK in 1917. His mother was Isadore Gardner who was born in Kansas and his father was Lige (or Liege) Angel and was born in Missouri. I have been unable to locate any information on either Isadore or Lige. Also, I can not locate Sterling Angel before his marriage in 1913. I have found him on the 1920 and the 1930 census. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Kim --------------------------------- Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

    10/10/2005 12:34:50
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS
    2. Donna
    3. http://www.chickasaw.net/ There isn't really nothing to see on their site it is just telling us about it. you have to be a Chickasaw citizens currently listed on the CDIB data base. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edna Montgomery" <bmontgomery001@charter.net> To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:27 AM Subject: Re: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS > Donna, > Please give the site address for the chickasaw census > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sandi Carter" <redfox5@sbcglobal.net> > To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:18 AM > Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS > > >> --- Donna <donnapich66@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> wanted to let everyone know just because I found it interesting that I >>> just got some forms in >>> the mail to do our Chickasaw Census, the papers say its been 100 yrs >>> since its been done. >>> >>> Donna >> >> Donna: >> >> That's terrific! My GG grandma was a Chickasaw but I don't believe she >> was on the census records. >> >> Thanks for sharing. >> >> Sandi Carter >> list mom >> >> >> ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== >> To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to >> IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or >> to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to >> IT-INDIAN-CHAT-D-request@rootsweb.com. >> >> ============================== >> View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find >> marriage announcements and more. Learn more: >> http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== > To unsubscribe, please send the command "unsubscribe" to > IT-INDIAN-L-request@rootsweb.com (if in mail mode) or > IT-INDIAN-D-request@rootsweb.com (if in digest mode.) > > ============================== > Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the > last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx > >

    10/05/2005 07:45:31
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS
    2. Donna
    3. Yes thats true.....but what I was excited about was that this info. will be really neat to come across say a hundred years from now, not for us, I am talking about our descendants way down the line. About it being made public, I would almost be sure that since my G-children's parents,G-parents ect.. were on the census you would think that they would be able to research it. Oh well I dont know....Laughs..burst my bubble I find another.... smiles.... :) Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill & Lynda Becker" <beckerw@ix.netcom.com> To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 2:38 PM Subject: RE: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS > This census is being done by the Tribe and forms were sent to the registered > Chickasaws with CDIB cards. If your ancestor didn't register with the Dawes > Commission, in the early 1900s, they aren't "considered" Chickasaw by the > powers that be, and that keeps any of their descendents from being enrolled > either. In order to register now, you must be able to prove your direct > relationship to an original enrollee. Not necessarily fair, but just the > way it is. > > They aren't asking any genealogical info. Just your name, address and > number of people in the family that are registered and their names if they > are living with you. It's only being done for a total count of the > Chickasaws in the world. You can fill out the form on line, but again, you > must have that CDIB card and be registered with the Tribe first. Or at > least that's the way I understand it. My Grandmother was an original > enrollee. My father was born too late to enroll with the Dawes bunch, but > was able to prove his relationship to my Grandmother and as a result, he is > registered. My sister and I had to go through the same process as did my > children and grandchildren. > > Having filled out the census form, I really wish they had asked some > personal info, but they didn't, so it (the census results) won't really be > of much use for genealogists other than seeing who is counted if the Tribe > allows that info to be made public. > > Lynda beckerw@ix.netcom.com > > > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== > To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to > > ============================== > New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429 > >

    10/05/2005 09:40:02
    1. RE: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS
    2. Bill & Lynda Becker
    3. This census is being done by the Tribe and forms were sent to the registered Chickasaws with CDIB cards. If your ancestor didn't register with the Dawes Commission, in the early 1900s, they aren't "considered" Chickasaw by the powers that be, and that keeps any of their descendents from being enrolled either. In order to register now, you must be able to prove your direct relationship to an original enrollee. Not necessarily fair, but just the way it is. They aren't asking any genealogical info. Just your name, address and number of people in the family that are registered and their names if they are living with you. It's only being done for a total count of the Chickasaws in the world. You can fill out the form on line, but again, you must have that CDIB card and be registered with the Tribe first. Or at least that's the way I understand it. My Grandmother was an original enrollee. My father was born too late to enroll with the Dawes bunch, but was able to prove his relationship to my Grandmother and as a result, he is registered. My sister and I had to go through the same process as did my children and grandchildren. Having filled out the census form, I really wish they had asked some personal info, but they didn't, so it (the census results) won't really be of much use for genealogists other than seeing who is counted if the Tribe allows that info to be made public. Lynda beckerw@ix.netcom.com

    10/05/2005 07:38:31
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS
    2. I would be interested in this census. My grandmother said she was born in Jim Town, which was the Chickasaw nation in what is now Oklahoma, in 1885. She said she was 1/4 Cherokee. There are no 1890 census records which I would find interesting. Her family can be found in the 1880 census of Montague County, TX. This is across the red river from the Chickasaw nation.

    10/05/2005 05:28:02
    1. Re: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS
    2. Edna Montgomery
    3. Donna, Please give the site address for the chickasaw census ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandi Carter" <redfox5@sbcglobal.net> To: <IT-INDIAN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 12:18 AM Subject: [IT-INDIAN] Re: CHICKASAW CENSUS > --- Donna <donnapich66@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> wanted to let everyone know just because I found it interesting that I >> just got some forms in >> the mail to do our Chickasaw Census, the papers say its been 100 yrs >> since its been done. >> >> Donna > > Donna: > > That's terrific! My GG grandma was a Chickasaw but I don't believe she > was on the census records. > > Thanks for sharing. > > Sandi Carter > list mom > > > ==== IT-INDIAN Mailing List ==== > To subscribe to our Chat list please send a message to > IT-INDIAN-CHAT-L-request@rootsweb.com that contains the word subscribe or > to subscribe to the digest mode, send the command instead to > IT-INDIAN-CHAT-D-request@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find > marriage announcements and more. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx

    10/05/2005 02:27:33