Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. [IRL-WICKLOW] Daniel Johnson and Priscilla Russell
    2. Frank Kehoe
    3. I have a poor quality photocopy of Page 64, Castlemacadam Marriages, Year 1854. Entry 52 reads; Daniel Johnson of Rathdrum Parish and Priscilla Russell of this Parish were married in this Church by License with consent of [looks like "parents"] this Fourth Day of July in the Year one Thousand eight Hundred and fifty four By me [?] Alex Saunders [Then the couple's signatures] In the Presence of: Rich [looks like "Tuke"] and F[squiggle] Russell. Does anyone know was this the same Daniel that married Mary-Anne Manning in 1866? Any other information on Daniel and/or Priscilla would be appreciated. The civil registration index for the 1854 marriage is Rathdrum, vol.9, page602. Thanks for reading this, Frank Kehoe

    05/20/2009 06:19:31
    1. Re: [IRL-WICKLOW] Daniel Johnson and Priscilla Russell
    2. Joyce
    3. Hi Frank In 1854 the fathers' names should have been recorded. Do you want me to take a look at The Castlemacadam records for you? Also do you know where the Mary-Anne Manning marriage took place in 1866? Again the fathers' names should be recorded. With this information it would help with deciding if "Daniel" was one and the same person. Not sure when I shall next be at R.C.B. Library, but if you need help with this, please get back to me. Someone else might have the answer without consulting the records. Best wishes Joyce >I have a poor quality photocopy of Page 64, Castlemacadam Marriages, Year > 1854. Entry 52 reads; > > Daniel Johnson of Rathdrum Parish and Priscilla Russell of this Parish > were > married in this Church by License with consent of [looks like "parents"] > this Fourth Day of July in the Year one Thousand eight Hundred and fifty > four By me [?] Alex Saunders [Then the couple's signatures] In the > Presence > of: Rich [looks like "Tuke"] and F[squiggle] Russell. > > Does anyone know was this the same Daniel that married Mary-Anne Manning > in > 1866? Any other information on Daniel and/or Priscilla would be > appreciated. > The civil registration index for the 1854 marriage is Rathdrum, vol.9, > page602. > >

    05/20/2009 07:35:15
    1. Re: [IRL-WICKLOW] Daniel Johnson and Priscilla Russell
    2. Cara_Links
    3. Whoops I missed something here sorry Frank Where is Dave Griffith he would know more on the Manning bits n pieces surely Richard Tuke and Francis Russell were the witnesses to the first marriage but I will have to say you will have to take Joyce up on her offer to scan the books for you to see if Daniel was a Widower and Joyce this Martha Parker aka Nosey needs to know as well Cheers Cara ----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Kehoe" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 9:19 PM Subject: [IRL-WICKLOW] Daniel Johnson and Priscilla Russell >I have a poor quality photocopy of Page 64, Castlemacadam Marriages, Year > 1854. Entry 52 reads; > > Daniel Johnson of Rathdrum Parish and Priscilla Russell of this Parish > were > married in this Church by License with consent of [looks like "parents"] > this Fourth Day of July in the Year one Thousand eight Hundred and fifty > four By me [?] Alex Saunders [Then the couple's signatures] In the > Presence > of: Rich [looks like "Tuke"] and F[squiggle] Russell. > > Does anyone know was this the same Daniel that married Mary-Anne Manning > in > 1866? Any other information on Daniel and/or Priscilla would be > appreciated. > The civil registration index for the 1854 marriage is Rathdrum, vol.9, > page602. > > Thanks for reading this, > > Frank Kehoe > > *************************************** > 1- Only leave in the body of the mail what is relevant to your answer > > 2- Change the SUBJECT LINE to suit the body of your own Mail to List. > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.35/2124 - Release Date: 05/20/09 06:22:00

    05/21/2009 08:27:18