On August 4th, Declan Barron sent me a Bradshaw tree which he identified as follows: "From: Declan Barron <newparkhouse.ennis@eircom.net> Mailed-By: eircom.net Reply-To: Declan Barron <newparkhouse.ennis@eircom.net> To: Janet Crawford <reojan@gmail.com> Date: Aug 4, 2006 8:01 PM Subject: Fw: Bradshaws Hi Janet, Here is the Green/Bradshaw family - No.98 Source of this tree is Paddy Waldron. Please contact me to OK it with Paddy before passing it on Declan" I have repeatedly asked Declan to have Paddy Waldron contact me to no avail. I am therefore doing this through the lists. Paddy Waldron, how did you come to have the work of Richard Bradshaw and myself? How did it come to be re-entitled "Green/Bradshaw family - No. 98" Why would Declan believe this to be your work and need your permission to be shared? Where has it been published? For everyone else - To top it off, this material is an OLD copy of the Bradshaw tree, which itself is a work in progress, meant only for members of the Bradshaw family, and WHICH STILL CONTAINS A SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF ERRORS YET TO BE RECONCILED by the family. It was never intended to be a document to be published in way, shape or format due to many inconsistancies in information received from various people. I specifically mention this as any Green who depends on the Green information contained within it will be led astray as new information has caused the children assigned to Green to be seriously questioned. Newer versions of this tree have clarified many items. To depend on what is called "Green/Bradshaw - No. 98" for accurate information would be foolish. Am I angry? - yes indeedy do! I am waiting to hear from you, Mr. Paddy Waldron. Tappity-tappity-tap-tap-tap Janet