Another consideration with these indexes is the fact that, with you still get a name-only listing so you still need to deal with which of three-five-or more Patrick Hogans in the 1868 deaths for Clare might be the right one. Also, transcription errors are common, and very likely someone is going to order the wrong record because even just one number is off in the entry info as transcribed. I did pay the fee at the Registrar's Office in Dublin and copied out all the death index listings for my various surnames. I have yet to order records for any of them. It has not been needed for my research. Sharon C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Casey" <pcasey@compuserve.com> To: <irl-clare-projects@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:02 AM Subject: Re: [IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS] Birth, Marriage & Death Index of Ireland > > The Registrar's Office in Dublin is already digitising the BMD records. I > don't know whether there are plans to put them on line (at a price) but I'm > not sure whether there would be added value in digitising the records a > second time apart from ensuring that they become accessible without charge. > > Or have I misunderstood something here ? > > Paddy > > > -----Original Message----- > From: irl-clare-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:irl-clare-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of > DLCulhane@cs.com > Sent: 29 March 2007 15:30 > To: irl-clare-projects@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS] Birth, Marriage & Death Index of Ireland > > > > The civil indexes are kept by the GRO, not the Church, and have been filmed > by the LDS. I think it would be a great volunteer project because the > indexes > are typeset so there's no difficult reading to guess at. In fact, I wonder > if > the entries could be scanned by an OCR system and then combined into larger > chunks of time, say 5 or 10 years. Eventually, of course, the goal would be > to > have the indexes span the period from 1864 through, say, 1964, but 5- or > 10-year > chunks would be a great start, much easier than looking at 3 months at a > time. > > Diane </HTML> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

My apologies for the double posting just now, and really bad typing recently. I need to get a new computer, which will be soon I think. I have totally screwed up the Outloook program in my current one. My workaround for that is sending out messages before thorough proofreading. I will try harder in the interim. Sharon C. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon Carberry" <sm8carberry@comcast.net> To: <irl-clare-projects@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 10:37 AM Subject: Re: [IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS] Birth, Marriage & Death Index of Ireland > Another consideration with these indexes is the fact that, with you still > get a name-only listing so you still need to deal with which of > three-five-or more Patrick Hogans in the 1868 deaths for Clare might be the > right one. Also, transcription errors are common, and very likely someone > is going to order the wrong record because even just one number is off in > the entry info as transcribed. > > I did pay the fee at the Registrar's Office in Dublin and copied out > all the death index listings for my various surnames. I have yet to order > records for any of them. It has not been needed for my research. > > Sharon C. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Casey" <pcasey@compuserve.com> > To: <irl-clare-projects@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:02 AM > Subject: Re: [IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS] Birth, Marriage & Death Index of Ireland > > > > > > The Registrar's Office in Dublin is already digitising the BMD records. I > > don't know whether there are plans to put them on line (at a price) but > I'm > > not sure whether there would be added value in digitising the records a > > second time apart from ensuring that they become accessible without > charge. > > > > Or have I misunderstood something here ? > > > > Paddy > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: irl-clare-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com > > [mailto:irl-clare-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of > > DLCulhane@cs.com > > Sent: 29 March 2007 15:30 > > To: irl-clare-projects@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS] Birth, Marriage & Death Index of Ireland > > > > > > > > The civil indexes are kept by the GRO, not the Church, and have been > filmed > > by the LDS. I think it would be a great volunteer project because the > > indexes > > are typeset so there's no difficult reading to guess at. In fact, I wonder > > if > > the entries could be scanned by an OCR system and then combined into > larger > > chunks of time, say 5 or 10 years. Eventually, of course, the goal would > be > > to > > have the indexes span the period from 1864 through, say, 1964, but 5- or > > 10-year > > chunks would be a great start, much easier than looking at 3 months at a > > time. > > > > Diane </HTML> > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to IRL-CLARE-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

LOL, the marvels of modern technology are wonderful, arn't they? I can only imagine what would happen if I were doing it. (I am notorious for overlooking the obvious mistakes. I belive this happens when my fingers get ahead of my small brain.) Joseph Sharon Carberry <sm8carberry@comcast.net> wrote: My apologies for the double posting just now, and really bad typing recently. I need to get a new computer, which will be soon I think. I have totally screwed up the Outloook program in my current one. My workaround for that is sending out messages before thorough proofreading. I will try harder in the interim. Sharon C.