RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. [IRISH-AMER] ACW - Account, Capt. Alexander HASKELL, Army of Northern Virginia
    2. Jean R.
    3. SNIPPET: Although the 144,000 Irish who served in the Union army are better known, 30,000 Irish also served the Confederacy. For the two war-weary armies facing each other in Virginia, it was a lull between storms. After their explosive encounter at Fredericksburg in December (1862), they had settled into winter camps on either side of the Rappahannock River. Men welcomed the respite, but inactivity could be as hard on troops as marching and fighting. The imminent threat of death in battle faded, only to be replaced by the perils of disease, malnutrition, and exposure. "That winter was probably the most dreary and miserable we had," recalled Captain Alexander HASKELL of LEE's Army of Northern Virginia. "The suffering from cold, hunger, and nakedness was intense and widespread. There were thousands on duty in the perpetual snow and mud, without shoes, often no blanket, hardly any overcoats, and many without coats, nothing often but a ragged homespun shirt." Shortages of food and clothing grew worse for Confederates as Federals occupied their territory, tightened the blockade, and took control of the Mississippi. Families sent aid to soldiers in camp, HASKELL noted, "but much of this was lost by defective transportation, and for the poor fellows from across the Mississippi nothing could come." LEE himself lived frugally that winter, as HASKELL discovered when he visited the general's headquarters in early 1863. "He chanced to come out just as I was taking my leave," HASKELL wrote, "and as it was the hour for dinner he politely insisted on sharing the meal." If the young captain expected a feast, he was mistaken. As they entered the tent, he related, "there was before us a crude board table with camp stools around it; on it a beautiful glass dish of 'Virginia Pickles' sent by some hospitable Virginia lady; the balance of the dinner was a plate of corn bread, or 'pones,' and a very small piece of boiled bacon." After saying grace, LEE explained to his guests that his Irish servant Mike had "harder work than we have in Quarters, and must be fed." He then cut a thick slice for Mike, HASKELL noted, laid it aside and offered each of his guests and himself a portion that was "but a fraction of Mike's." This was typical of LEE, whose consideration for men of all ranks helped earn him the lasting devotion of his troops in circumstances that would have demoralized other armies. Soldiers called him "Marse Robert" and felt he had their best interests at heart even during the hardest campaigns. "The boys never cheer him," wrote Corporal Edmund PATTERSON, "but pull off their hats and worship." For all his personal charms, LEE could not have commanded such loyalty without success in battle. Much as he did as a host by stretching that "very small piece of boiled bacon" as far as possible, he made the most of limited resources as a commander by repeatedly defeating armies larger and better equipped than his own. He couldn't hope to perform such feats much longer, however, if his army grew much weaker. Losses to desertion and disease were mounting, and his men were so malnourished he was not sure how much more he could ask of them. "I fear they will be unable to endure the hardships of the approaching campaign," he wrote in late March. "Symptoms of scurvy are appearing among them, and, to supply the place of vegetables, each regiment is directed to send a daily detail to gather sassafras buds, wild onions, garlic, lamb's quarter, and poke sprouts." For now, the poor condition of his troops and the numerical superiority of the Federals across the river forced him to remain on the defensive. But if his opponents happened to squander their advantage and leave him an opening, he would attack with everything he had. He could not afford to play a waiting game. One more winter of hardship and stalemate such as this and his army might be driven back to Richmond and ultimate defeat. However, if the year ended with Federals in retreat and the Union demoralized, Northern voters might reject Abraham LINCOLN in 1864 in favor of a Democrat willing to end the war on terms favorable to the South. If his army prevailed, LEE wrote to his wife, "there will be a great change in public opinion at the North. The Republicans will be destroyed." ... -- Excerpt, "Eyewitness To The Civil War, The Complete History From Secession To Reconstruction," Neil Kagan & Stephen G. Hyslop, National Geographic Book, Washington D.C. (2006).

    11/23/2008 01:07:27