Then, Lori, please suggest how it should be worded. Or perhaps tell me which words you do not like and I will try to change them for you. Debby wrote the words for this and Eric & I agree with it as what we intend on it to mean. I have looked at this several times and do not understand why anyone would not want our CCs to have INGenWeb sites with genealogy information on it that is of interest to their county. Come on, isn't that what we are all here to do? This first little sentence tells anyone interested in helping that this is what it is all about - helping researchers find their roots in our county. Lori, so far, you are the only one that READS that sentence the way you do - are there others who READ this differently than it was intended? I think the sentence says what it should, maybe someone else can suggest improvements! JGW At 07:54 PM 5/3/99 -0500, Lori wrote: >Debby >> That was very well stated. > >Too bad it doesn't READ that way. > >I agree with what John says it is "supposed" to mean, but I don't agree >with how it is worded. It means something other than what the committee >intends for it to mean, the way it comes across right now. > >> >Lori, this is a very simple statement stating that this is a website of a >> >genealogical nature that concerns this one particular county. I do not >> >think it has some sinister or demanding nature to it as you seem to read >> >into it. Any word in this entire document can be twisted by anyone. >> >Please take the sentence in its entirety. JGW > >Lori >Ripley CC > > >