Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'india-royalty'

Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Maharaja of Sirmur (Nahan)
    2. akshay chavan

    3. I am a little confused I have an article in INDIA TODAY maganize dated May 31 1986. This is regarding when Jagat singh took action against Bhawani Singh for partition of property. I quote from the article " Three years ago Maharani Padmini Devi moved back to jaipur from delhi. Soon after Padminidevi's brothers Amarendra jit singh pal and prabhu jyoti singh also arrived in jaipur. Amadrendra became Bhawani singh's controller of properties, a position of enormous clout resented by other family members. Matter came to head when Former Maharaja gave power of attorney to maharani padmini devi. The family members wanted to banish amarendra and his brother from the court." who is amarandra? How has he not become the Maharaja? of nahan? Can anyone plz explain this to me? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

    04/27/2005 06:42:07
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Maharaja of Sirmur (Nahan)
    2. Henry Soszynski

    3. At 12:42 AM 28/04/05 -0700, you wrote: >I am a little confused > I have an article in INDIA TODAY maganize dated May >31 1986. This is regarding when Jagat singh took >action against Bhawani Singh for partition of >property. I quote from the article >" Three years ago Maharani Padmini Devi moved back to >jaipur from delhi. Soon after Padminidevi's brothers >Amarendra jit singh pal and prabhu jyoti singh also >arrived in jaipur. Amadrendra became Bhawani singh's >controller of properties, a position of enormous clout >resented by other family members. Matter came to head >when Former Maharaja gave power of attorney to >maharani padmini devi. The family members wanted to >banish amarendra and his brother from the court." > >                who is amarandra? How has he not >become the Maharaja? of nahan?  Can anyone plz explain >this to me? > This is rather odd, as I can find no one in the Sirmur Royal Family with those names, and as pointed out, the late Maharaja of Nahan, had no sons. Maybe the article meant that they were nephews and not brothers, then they could be sons of the Raja of Alipura. A complete mystery. Cheers, Henry

    04/28/2005 02:01:00