RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 1940/3623
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Inquiry from Jim Havel
    2. abhijit malwade
    3. Dear Jim, It is indeed pleasure to know that, you are interested in collecting signatures of the indian princess. I am also an avid collector of signature letters myself and posses modertate collection of few of them. My collection includes signatures of many prominant princess like, Maharaja Harisingh (Jammu & Kashmir) Maharaja Gangasingh (Bikaner) Maharaja Bhupalsingh (Udaipur) Chatrapati Shahu (Kolhapur) Jamsaheb Ranjitsinghji (Nawanagar) I would be glad to send you the scan images of those letters for your collection. Meanwhile, try the following link. http://indianautographs.com/rulers-of-indian-princely-states.html This is a autograph site where you will find many interesting things for your collection. Regards Abhijit --- Havel <JHAVEL@columbus.rr.com> wrote: > I'm a member and regular reader of the dialog among > India-Royalty members. However, I haven't > participated, as most of the conversation requires > more depth of knowledge than I possess. However, I > am prompted to write now to inquire as to whether > any members have old letters, signed photographs, > manuscripts or autographs of current or former > Indian royalty that they would consider selling to > me for a reasonable price. > I am 65 years old and retired, living on my pension. > I have a special interest in Indian autographs and > would like to hear from anyone who has such > autographs for sale or trade. I would also welcome > scans of any items you might have but would not wish > to sell or trade, as I maintain a reference file of > scanned signatures. > Your help on this would be most gratefully > appreciated. > Sincerely, > Jim Havel > JHAVEL@columbus.rr.com > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

    03/29/2008 04:02:18
    1. [INDIA-ROYALTY] To David Phillips
    2. Havel
    3. Thanks for the tip, David. I appreciate the assistance. Jim Havel

    03/29/2008 03:32:22
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Inquiry from Jim Havel
    2. Try Duleep Shahani, art@vsnl.com, in Bombay. He has lots of these, and I bought some nice ones from him. I was after the letterheads rather than the autographs. Also a good source in Bombay, but pricier, is Farukh Todywalla, todywallahouse@hotmail.com, also in Bombay. David Phillips San Francisco -----Original Message----- From: india-royalty-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:india-royalty-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Havel Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 12:55 PM To: india-royalty@rootsweb.com Subject: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Inquiry from Jim Havel I'm a member and regular reader of the dialog among India-Royalty members. However, I haven't participated, as most of the conversation requires more depth of knowledge than I possess. However, I am prompted to write now to inquire as to whether any members have old letters, signed photographs, manuscripts or autographs of current or former Indian royalty that they would consider selling to me for a reasonable price. I am 65 years old and retired, living on my pension. I have a special interest in Indian autographs and would like to hear from anyone who has such autographs for sale or trade. I would also welcome scans of any items you might have but would not wish to sell or trade, as I maintain a reference file of scanned signatures. Your help on this would be most gratefully appreciated. Sincerely, Jim Havel JHAVEL@columbus.rr.com ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ___________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. Farella Braun + Martel LLP

    03/29/2008 11:06:15
    1. [INDIA-ROYALTY] Inquiry from Jim Havel
    2. Havel
    3. I'm a member and regular reader of the dialog among India-Royalty members. However, I haven't participated, as most of the conversation requires more depth of knowledge than I possess. However, I am prompted to write now to inquire as to whether any members have old letters, signed photographs, manuscripts or autographs of current or former Indian royalty that they would consider selling to me for a reasonable price. I am 65 years old and retired, living on my pension. I have a special interest in Indian autographs and would like to hear from anyone who has such autographs for sale or trade. I would also welcome scans of any items you might have but would not wish to sell or trade, as I maintain a reference file of scanned signatures. Your help on this would be most gratefully appreciated. Sincerely, Jim Havel JHAVEL@columbus.rr.com

    03/29/2008 09:55:07
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Gaekwad
    2. I came to know that Anshuman Gaekwad is from Baroda Royal family.But could not find his details in Henry's site. Can anyone tell me how is he related to Samarjit Gaekwad or Fateh Singh Rao Gaekwad? Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

    03/27/2008 06:26:54
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. Actually, Bolangir was the cpital of Patna Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

    03/27/2008 05:35:02
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. Thanks Mandeep for your feedback.Actually, in those days it used to be called as Bolangir Patna. Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

    03/27/2008 05:33:16
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. Mandeep Singh Bajwa
    3. Amrita Singh (Virk) is not from a royal family.Her family are Sardars (landowners) from Jandiala Guru near Amritsar. Yes, Chandrachur Singh is the grandson of RN Deo Singh Patna (not Bolangir). Mandeep Singh Bajwa On 27/03/2008, samarjit.mukherjea@in.pwc.com <samarjit.mukherjea@in.pwc.com> wrote: > > Hey, reshmi. I was going through your article on royalty in bollywood. I > did not know that Amrita Singh was from a royal ( zamindar) family. One > piece of information for you. Actually my great grandfather was a friend > of Maharaja R.N. Singh Deo of Bolangir ( Orissa). I think Chandrachud > Singh ( in Bollywood) is a grandson of R.N.Singh Deo.But I am not sure. > > Did not get reply from you.There were two more families of East Bengal > that I missed out. Natore and Bhagyokul. > > IIf you can throw some light on Sanjoy Narayan, I would be > delighted.Previously, I had thought there is no male descendant left of > the Coochbehar family and the only two indirect descendants are Prodyut > Deb Burman of Tripura ( Her mom is from Coochbehar) and Maharani Gayatri > Devi's son. > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Samarjit Mukherjea > Assistant Manager, ABAS > pwc | *connectedthinking > Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V > Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 > INDIA > Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 > Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 > Mobile : +91-9830513932 > www.pwc.com > --------------------------------------------- > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material > from any computer. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    03/27/2008 05:23:48
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. Hey, reshmi. I was going through your article on royalty in bollywood. I did not know that Amrita Singh was from a royal ( zamindar) family. One piece of information for you. Actually my great grandfather was a friend of Maharaja R.N. Singh Deo of Bolangir ( Orissa). I think Chandrachud Singh ( in Bollywood) is a grandson of R.N.Singh Deo.But I am not sure. Did not get reply from you.There were two more families of East Bengal that I missed out. Natore and Bhagyokul. IIf you can throw some light on Sanjoy Narayan, I would be delighted.Previously, I had thought there is no male descendant left of the Coochbehar family and the only two indirect descendants are Prodyut Deb Burman of Tripura ( Her mom is from Coochbehar) and Maharani Gayatri Devi's son. Thanks Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

    03/27/2008 05:13:48
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. kuldeep solanki
    3. Hey Samarjt, to which royal family do you belong? samarjit.mukherjea@in.pwc.com wrote: I don't know how many among you belong to a royal family like me.But I absolutely agree that we should try to stop the blame game.We should try to stop bringing religion intoa picture.I strictly condemn the fact that our ancient monuments have been damaged,historical relics have been demolished. But no one would gain anything by infusing their anger in this form.History is a beautiful subject,it is a narration of past events ,under the auspices of which we should not lurk into the past but build our paltform for a strong future.I would request everybody to forget this topic. We all know Aurangzeb was a tyrrant ruler.We all know that Akbar was secular.Same dynasty had given us two opposite rulers.Opinions may differ, but as a whole we should keep in mind that Mughal era had been a combination of brutality,anarchy,demolition as well as benevolence,unity,secularism. Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message --------------------------------- Now you can chat without downloading messenger. Click here to know how.

    03/26/2008 01:11:58
  1. 03/25/2008 10:03:37
  2. 03/25/2008 09:43:47
    1. [INDIA-ROYALTY] Miraj: Article
    2. akshay chavan
    3. Hi I cam across this interesting article on a Miraj royal: http://www.india-today.com/btoday/20030914/features3.html ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

    03/25/2008 09:29:30
    1. [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi-Leftist and mails
    2. Epicure
    3. Dear All, I would indeed like to confine my views to matters concerning Royality, but I am also unable to resist any attempts that are touted by anyone to distort facts that are clearly visible to anyone who tries to indulge in a bit of lateral thinking. I'd like to close this topic and leave it to the wise judgement of all of you to as all of you are quite aware. But before I do that, I shall comment onthe views expressed by Learned Ashok Tyagi and Learned David Phillips on the leftists or communists. Commenting on my contention that leftists are pro-Muslim or Anti Hindu, Sh. Tyagi states inter alia that Leftists are anti-establishment. Were that true, communists may not have alligned with the church in the whole of South America, leave aside opposing it. Were that true, the communists would have made more inroads in East Bengal or Bangladesh of today, other than focussing on Nepal, and especially their suo motu declaring it a 'secular' state, where as no one demanded the Hindu Nepal to be declared so. Any observing mind would have observed that all 'progressive' Muslims who demanded and migrated to Pakistan were Leftists/Communists(Mr. David Phillips may observe this). Leftists have broken hell over the riots in Gujarat, but never did a word emerge from them when Hindus were the target of constant loot, rape and arson? I could go on with specific example, but my intent is just to support my observation about the left oriented 'historians', and nothing else. Anyone wishing to discuss anything further this is welcome to mail me individually. Best Wishes! SHYAM

    03/21/2008 01:36:14
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. akshay chavan
    3. Hi A lot has been commented on this issue. This is not a black and white issue. I would like to clarify my position. There are two issues getting mixed up over here. First is the Hindu- Muslim issue and second is the negation of history. Regarding the first issue, we in India usualy get very emotional about history. I see no reason why muslims today should be blamed for something which happened 500 years ago. It is very similar to the Vasundhara raje scindia being asked to apologise for 1857!!!! I will not accept blame for something done by my great great grandfather. So I agree that this should not be turned into a Hindu-Muslim issue. Muslims today have nothing to do with what happened 500 years ago or what Aurangzeb did. Regarding the second issue, negation of history. I apologise for calling it a "leftist" attempt. Negation of history is very common in India and both "leftists" and "rightists" indulge in it. And it is not limited to the muslim rulers of India. A closer example - "Maratha invasion of Rajasthan and Bengal" . It was very destructive but dare say that in Maharashtra (I could be lynched for saying this) . In Maharashta, it is simply glossed over as it never happened. What I strongly feel is that history should not be negated. If Aurangzeb destroyed temples, say so. If Marathas destroyed Rajasthan and bengal say so...... As a Maratha, I dont accept any blame for what Maratha armies did and nor should muslims today. Hopefully good sense will prevail. That is my wishfull thinking. --- ajay <srivastava@vacoxmail.com> wrote: > I like Samarjeet's views. Its pointless to play the > blame game because the > people are no longer alive from the era. However, we > should expand our > knowledge beyond the text books from school (which > unfortunately have to > align with the populist thought of the time). > > It is always better to know all perspectives. There > is also volumes of > information available on the net from "respected > Mulsim historians" of > medieval period and its free. I believe, if someone > cares to give opinion > then one should care to educate oneself a little bit > beyond the textbooks. > > Here are some free books available online for those > who are willing to > educaten themselves to any other opinion (other than > our text book > knowledge). The links below is just for reference. > One can dig lot more > information on the internet. > > http://www.bharatvani.org/books/ > http://www.bharatvani.org/books/tfst/chii6.htm > > Rai Kunwar Ajay Srivastava > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <samarjit.mukherjea@in.pwc.com> > To: <india-royalty@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:10 AM > Subject: Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi > > > > I don't know how many among you belong to a royal > family like me.But I > > absolutely agree that we should try to stop the > blame game.We should try > > to stop bringing religion intoa picture.I > strictly condemn the fact that > > our ancient monuments have been damaged,historical > relics have been > > demolished. But no one would gain anything by > infusing their anger in > > this form.History is a beautiful subject,it is a > narration of past events > > ,under the auspices of which we should not lurk > into the past but build > > our paltform for a strong future.I would request > everybody to forget this > > topic. We all know Aurangzeb was a tyrrant > ruler.We all know that Akbar > > was secular.Same dynasty had given us two opposite > rulers.Opinions may > > differ, but as a whole we should keep in mind > that Mughal era had been > > a combination of brutality,anarchy,demolition as > well as > > benevolence,unity,secularism. > > > > > > > > > > > > Samarjit Mukherjea > > Assistant Manager, ABAS > > pwc | *connectedthinking > > Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V > > Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 > > INDIA > > Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 > > Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 > > Mobile : +91-9830513932 > > www.pwc.com > > --------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > The information transmitted is intended only for > the person or entity to > > which it is addressed and may contain confidential > and/or privileged > > material. Any review, retransmission, > dissemination or other use of, or > > taking of any action in reliance upon, this > information by persons or > > entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited. If you > > received this in error, please contact the sender > and delete the material > > from any computer. > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to > INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email > to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word > 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

    03/21/2008 05:39:57
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. I don't know how many among you belong to a royal family like me.But I absolutely agree that we should try to stop the blame game.We should try to stop bringing religion intoa picture.I strictly condemn the fact that our ancient monuments have been damaged,historical relics have been demolished. But no one would gain anything by infusing their anger in this form.History is a beautiful subject,it is a narration of past events ,under the auspices of which we should not lurk into the past but build our paltform for a strong future.I would request everybody to forget this topic. We all know Aurangzeb was a tyrrant ruler.We all know that Akbar was secular.Same dynasty had given us two opposite rulers.Opinions may differ, but as a whole we should keep in mind that Mughal era had been a combination of brutality,anarchy,demolition as well as benevolence,unity,secularism. Samarjit Mukherjea Assistant Manager, ABAS pwc | *connectedthinking Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 INDIA Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 Mobile : +91-9830513932 www.pwc.com --------------------------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

    03/20/2008 05:40:03
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. ajay
    3. I like Samarjeet's views. Its pointless to play the blame game because the people are no longer alive from the era. However, we should expand our knowledge beyond the text books from school (which unfortunately have to align with the populist thought of the time). It is always better to know all perspectives. There is also volumes of information available on the net from "respected Mulsim historians" of medieval period and its free. I believe, if someone cares to give opinion then one should care to educate oneself a little bit beyond the textbooks. Here are some free books available online for those who are willing to educaten themselves to any other opinion (other than our text book knowledge). The links below is just for reference. One can dig lot more information on the internet. http://www.bharatvani.org/books/ http://www.bharatvani.org/books/tfst/chii6.htm Rai Kunwar Ajay Srivastava ----- Original Message ----- From: <samarjit.mukherjea@in.pwc.com> To: <india-royalty@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 1:10 AM Subject: Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi > I don't know how many among you belong to a royal family like me.But I > absolutely agree that we should try to stop the blame game.We should try > to stop bringing religion intoa picture.I strictly condemn the fact that > our ancient monuments have been damaged,historical relics have been > demolished. But no one would gain anything by infusing their anger in > this form.History is a beautiful subject,it is a narration of past events > ,under the auspices of which we should not lurk into the past but build > our paltform for a strong future.I would request everybody to forget this > topic. We all know Aurangzeb was a tyrrant ruler.We all know that Akbar > was secular.Same dynasty had given us two opposite rulers.Opinions may > differ, but as a whole we should keep in mind that Mughal era had been > a combination of brutality,anarchy,demolition as well as > benevolence,unity,secularism. > > > > > > Samarjit Mukherjea > Assistant Manager, ABAS > pwc | *connectedthinking > Plot No. Y-14, Block EP, Sector-V > Salt Lake, Kolkata-700091 > INDIA > Office : +91(33) 2357 9100 EXTN : 1139 > Facsimile : +91(33) 2357 7456/3394/7207 > Mobile : +91-9830513932 > www.pwc.com > --------------------------------------------- > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material > from any computer. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    03/20/2008 05:09:53
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. ssnathawat
    3. Dear Mr. David Phllips, and all other readers, Indians use to speak/write/say state-forward; not diplomatic like US. Sorry, but it's fact ! Mr. Syam's concerned to show his anger ness against "Pande" as he had un-knowledgably support to Aurangzeb whereas he (Aurangzeb) was a true Anti-Hindus. I think, we should close this topic by now. SS Nathawat ----- Original Message ----- From: <DPhillips@fbm.com> To: <india-royalty@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 9:58 PM Subject: Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi > As an American and an outsider to Indian politics (although I have > studied Indian history and been to India many times), I am puzzled by > Shyam's statement that "Mr. Pande is a known leftist, which makes him > pro-Muslim (or anti-Hindu) by default." Leaving aside Mr. Pande's > actual views, why would it appear that a leftist orientation (and does > that mean Communist or what?) would be pro-Muslim or anti-Hindu? Islam > seems like a pretty conservative ideology to me as an outsider, and in > former times India was aligned with the USSR against a pro-US Pakistan. > So I don't understand why leftist is considered equivalent to > pro-Muslim. Can someone explain this to me? Thanks in advance. > > David Phillips > San Francisco > > -----Original Message----- > From: india-royalty-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:india-royalty-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Epicure > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 4:54 AM > To: india-royalty@rootsweb.com > Subject: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi > > > Dear Mr Pabitra Saha, > There is a constant atempt to whitewash the 'sins' of the Mughals, and > this > is one of those numerous attempts. The possibility of tampering with > Hindu > beliefs is all the more because they have never appeared in a > collective > manner against any statement or aggression against them. > The said Mr. Pande is a known leftist, which makes him pro-Muslim (or > anti-Hindu) by default. Would anyone ask Mr. Pandey to provide any > substantial, tangible evidence to support his hypothesis? And > justification > has he coined for Mathura? > Best wishes! > SHYAM > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "pabitra saha" <pksaha000@yahoo.co.uk> > To: "royalty" <INDIA-ROYALTY-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:37 AM > Subject: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi > > > I was recently given this detail. Can anyone confirm this? > > "One of the greatest charges against Aurangzeb is of the demolition of > > Vishwanath Temple in Banaras (Varanasi). That was a fact, but Dr. Pande > unravelled the reason for it. "While Aurangzeb was passing near Varanasi > on > his way to Bengal, the Hindu Rajas in his retinue requested that if the > halt > was made for a day, their Ranis may go to Varanasi, have a dip in the > Ganges > and pay their homage to Lord Vishwanath. Aurangzeb readily agreed. > "Army pickets were posted on the five mile route to Varanasi. The > Ranis > made journey on the palkis (palanquins). They took their dip in the > Ganges > and went to the Vishwanath Temple to pay their homage. After offering > puja > (worship) all the Ranis returned except one, the Maharani of Kutch. A > thorough search was made of the temple precincts but the Rani was to be > found nowhere. "When Aurangzeb came to know of this, he was very much > enraged. He sent his senior officers to search for the Rani. Ultimately > they > found that statue of Ganesh which was fixed in the wall was a moveable > one. > When the statue was moved, they saw a flight of stairs that led to the > basement. To their horror they found the missing Rani dishonoured and > crying > deprived of all her ornaments. The basement was just beneath Lord > Vishwanath's seat." > The Rajas demanded salutary action, and "Aurangzeb ordered that as the > > sacred precincts have been despoiled, Lord Vishwanath may be moved to > some > other place, the temple be razed to the ground and the Mahant (head > priest) > be arrested and punished." ( Pande, Bishma Narain, Islam and Indian > Culture, > Khuda Bakhsh Oriental Public Library, Patna, 1987)." > > > > > with best wishes, > pks > > > --------------------------------- > Rise to the challenge for Sport Relief with Yahoo! for Good > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ___________________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy > all copies of the original message. Thank you. Farella Braun + Martel LLP > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to INDIA-ROYALTY-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > Siel Chemical Complex, Rajpura, India Disclaimer: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Siel Chemical Complex accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. ------------------------------------- Siel Chemical Complex, Rajpura, India

    03/20/2008 03:18:56
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Aurangzeb of Delhi
    2. Rahul Biswas
    3. Hallo Everybody, Is there anything written on this subject by Jadunath Sarkar in his History of the Moghul Empire? To my knowledge, it is the most comprehensive and authentic writing of that period. Regards, Rahul Biswas

    03/19/2008 04:44:22
    1. Re: [INDIA-ROYALTY] Gwaliar - news
    2. Henry Soszynski
    3. At 06:35 AM 18-03-08 -0700, you wrote: >Is anyone got pics of Sardar Col. Sambhajirao Angre and his family members? Do anyone have list of other Sardars,Zamindars,Jahagirdars of Gwalior? Can anyone tell me whether anybody from Scindia family were present to his funeral? How he died? What was the cause? Do any Sardars,Zamindars,Jahagirdars are as close to Scindia family as Angre are? >  Vilas > Greetings Vilas, I've sent you a photo of Sardar Shahajirao Angre, younger brother of the late Sardar, directly to you as Rootsweb don't allow attachments. He died of renal failure aged 85 (88 in a different source). As for connections with other nobles of Gwalior, someone else may have to answer that. Its unlikely that anyone from the Scindia family would have attended his funeral IMHO. Cheers, Henry

    03/19/2008 12:39:28