I use to think my Susannah LOVELL may have been from Hancock Co but have since found her and family from Edgar Co., Ill. Still looking for MORRIS-WILLIAMS-and JOHNSON lines, the FELCH lines seemed to have married both MORRIS and JOHNSON and even lived close to each other. My Davis line has not been found yet. I am seeking the parents of John Sylvester DAVIS born in 1857 (Have full birthdate somewhere). I was told by a cousin that he was born in Webster, Hancock Co., Ill. Just now found a possible John DAVIS in Hancock Co 1860 census born abt 1858. Can someone who has access to the census records send me the John DAVIS from there? Below is what showed up minus the city. John Davis, Hancock Co, age 2 in census born abt 1858 Thank You
Do you have John William Morris b.June 16, 1852 d. Aug 6, 1911 m. Laura F. Fenner b. Feb 2, 1852 d. Jan 1, 1916 in Adams Co. Ill.? ----- Original Message ----- From: Lady Tia <castlespirit2003@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:07 pm Subject: [ILHANCOC] Roll Call-DAVIS-MORRIS-WILLIAMS-JOHNSON-FELCH To: ilhancoc@rootsweb.com > I use to think my Susannah LOVELL may have been from Hancock Co > but have > since found her and family from Edgar Co., Ill. > > Still looking for MORRIS-WILLIAMS-and JOHNSON lines, the FELCH > lines seemed > to have married both MORRIS and JOHNSON and even lived close to > each other. > > My Davis line has not been found yet. I am seeking the parents of John > Sylvester DAVIS born in 1857 (Have full birthdate somewhere). I > was told by > a cousin that he was born in Webster, Hancock Co., Ill. > > Just now found a possible John DAVIS in Hancock Co 1860 census > born abt > 1858. > > Can someone who has access to the census records send me the John > DAVIS from > there? > > Below is what showed up minus the city. > > John Davis, Hancock Co, age 2 in census born abt 1858 > > > Thank You > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ILHANCOC- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >