Nah not all "I" group are adopted. Reason why I said there are several line who have not had enough folks tested. I was going to get into this but I cut my email short. There are a whole bunch of NorthEast Hunt that we do not have any sign of sample completed yet. There are line that daughtered out and have no idea where they came from. The few family I listed are just that a few of the a lot of lines out there. This is reason I said do not be suprise if you end up with more question then answers when getting tested. When I got started there was only 4 people available from public database. I have gathered around 35 sample now. So we have ton of lines and it going to be a long time before we get a better graps as Hunt is an occupation name the Haplogroup the people fall into with be a lot. Surname became in use around 1200? I have found John Hunt marrying a Mary in Edinburg in 1400. John was a City Guard of Edinburg. I really dislike having to search for John and Mary Hunt in geneolgy there just to many of them. =) Allen Brian Hunt -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Matthew J. Hunt" <matt@hunttech.net> > Allen, > I think it might be worth mentioning that in the I haplogroup, the one > line you mention as being adopted is *only* one of the I haplo lines out > there.

Hi: I'm trying to follow this but am pretty confused. Who was adopted by whom? Thanks, Susan ----- Original Message ----- From: <a.hunt@comcast.net> To: <hunt-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [HUNT] Current Y-DNA lines discovery > Nah not all "I" group are adopted. > > Reason why I said there are several line who have not had enough folks > tested. I > was going to get into this but I cut my email short. > > There are a whole bunch of NorthEast Hunt that we do not have any sign of > sample > completed yet. There are line that daughtered out and have no idea where > they > came from. > > The few family I listed are just that a few of the a lot of lines out > there. > This is reason I said do not be suprise if you end up with more question > then > answers when getting tested. > > When I got started there was only 4 people available from public database. > I > have gathered around 35 sample now. > > So we have ton of lines and it going to be a long time before we get a > better > graps as Hunt is an occupation name the Haplogroup the people fall into > with be > a lot. Surname became in use around 1200? I have found John Hunt marrying > a Mary > in Edinburg in 1400. John was a City Guard of Edinburg. > > I really dislike having to search for John and Mary Hunt in geneolgy there > just > to many of them. =) > > Allen Brian Hunt > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Matthew J. Hunt" <matt@hunttech.net> >> Allen, >> I think it might be worth mentioning that in the I haplogroup, the one >> line you mention as being adopted is *only* one of the I haplo lines out >> there. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > HUNT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

Susan (and list members): Allen was responding to an email I sent him directly. I just thought it might be best to clarify the situation with the Hunts in the "I" Haplogroup. I read his first post and it would seem discouraging for those who have been tested as members of the I haplogroup or even for those about to get their results and find that their 'predicted haplogroup' is "I". I am a 'Hunt' and I am an "I1a", and technically, an "I1a-un" for "ultra-norse". However, my Hunt line is not the one mentioned that appears to be a result of an adoption. My lineage is clearly English and is provable. In a historical way, it makes sense that I could be an I1a-UltraNorse and claim England as my heritage. England has been invaded, conquered, and taken over several times. The Norse definitely invaded England. :) Since I am member of the "I" haplogroup and there are far fewer of us tested and in any database, I certainly didn't want anyone to fail to post or share their results if they are a "Hunt" and also an "I", since in genealogical research, "adoption" can be a big mess for researchers. I just wanted to clarify that this supposed 'adopted line' is but one of the Hunt lines that are of the "I" haplogroup. There are others! I am one! ... Matthew J. Hunt Hunt Technical Services, Inc. http://www.hunttech.net -----Original Message----- From: hunt-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:hunt-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Susan Skilton Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 5:26 PM To: hunt@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [HUNT] Current Y-DNA lines discovery Hi: I'm trying to follow this but am pretty confused. Who was adopted by whom? Thanks, Susan ----- Original Message ----- From: <a.hunt@comcast.net> To: <hunt-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [HUNT] Current Y-DNA lines discovery > Nah not all "I" group are adopted. > > Reason why I said there are several line who have not had enough folks > tested. I was going to get into this but I cut my email short. > > There are a whole bunch of NorthEast Hunt that we do not have any sign > of sample completed yet. There are line that daughtered out and have > no idea where they came from. > > The few family I listed are just that a few of the a lot of lines out > there. > This is reason I said do not be suprise if you end up with more > question then answers when getting tested. > > When I got started there was only 4 people available from public database. > I > have gathered around 35 sample now. > > So we have ton of lines and it going to be a long time before we get a > better graps as Hunt is an occupation name the Haplogroup the people > fall into with be a lot. Surname became in use around 1200? I have > found John Hunt marrying a Mary in Edinburg in 1400. John was a City > Guard of Edinburg. > > I really dislike having to search for John and Mary Hunt in geneolgy > there just to many of them. =) > > Allen Brian Hunt > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: "Matthew J. Hunt" <matt@hunttech.net> >> Allen, >> I think it might be worth mentioning that in the I haplogroup, the >> one line you mention as being adopted is *only* one of the I haplo >> lines out there. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > HUNT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to HUNT-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message