------_Part_3c6c2b38-027d-d69-010203040506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------_Part_3c6c2b38-027d-d69-010203040506 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <> Received: from rly-ye01.mx.aol.com (rly-ye01.mail.aol.com [172.18.151.198]) by air-ye01.mail.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MAILINYE12-0214144801; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:48:01 -0500 Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com (imo-m06.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.161]) by rly-ye01.mx.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINYE19-0214144742; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost) by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/AOL-5.0.0) with internal id OAA17177; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:42 -0500 (EST) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]> Subject: Returned mail: <@>... list:; syntax illegal for recipient addresses Message-Id: <[email protected]> To: [email protected] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="OAA17177.1013716062/imo-m06.mx.aol.com" Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) --OAA17177.1013716062/imo-m06.mx.aol.com The original message was received at Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:38 -0500 (EST) from [email protected] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <@> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 553 <@>... list:; syntax illegal for recipient addresses --OAA17177.1013716062/imo-m06.mx.aol.com Reporting-MTA: dns; imo-m06.mx.aol.com Arrival-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:38 -0500 (EST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; <@> Action: failed Status: 5.1.3 Last-Attempt-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:42 -0500 (EST) --OAA17177.1013716062/imo-m06.mx.aol.com Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from [email protected] by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v32.5.) id 1.119.c98e04a (15880) for <@>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:38 -0500 (EST) Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from web41.aolmail.aol.com (web41.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.2]) by air-id07.mx.aol.com (v83.35) with ESMTP id MAILINID77-0214144738; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:47:35 EST From: [email protected] Subject: PHILIP HOWELL To: <[HOWELL-L]@rootsweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: <[email protected]> It is possible but I doubt that the Philip Howell from Alabama is the one I am seeking.The 1799/1800 birth date seems pretty solid and it is known the family was raised in Perry Co, IN. However,there are some interesting facts involved...My Philip had a son named Philip Benjamin and the Alabama Philip had a son named Benjamin. My Philip's second wife was named Mary B. Sandage but she was called "Polly" which was the same as the other Philip's wife and both wives were born in SC. Seems like a lot of similarities so I am beginning to wonder if these two Philips were father and son,cousins,uncle/nephew?? As to the TN line, the following info came from Ancestry.com with source shown as [email protected] William Howell b b4 1759, PA ?, d 1803/04 Stokes Co, NC Mar Ann ? b b4 1759 Philip Howell b 1775 ( PA, NC ??), d 1838 Greene Co, TN Mar Elizabeth Fox 04 Oct 1797 Other children of Wm. and Ann were Rebecca b 1774, PA, Colonies, family must have started here Millicent b b4 1775 Elizabeth abt 1775 Mary Ann 15 Dec 1789, NC John b 1798 Will appreciate any help or suggestions. Ron K. --OAA17177.1013716062/imo-m06.mx.aol.com-- ------_Part_3c6c2b38-027d-d69-010203040506--