RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [HATCHER] Re: Early English Hatchers
    2. Steve Williams
    3. The potential role that I see for HFA is as a forum to allow individuals who have submitted DNA samples (whether "DNA geek" or novice) to find each other. The amount of work involved in evaluating autosomal DNA matches (and lack thereof) is far beyond what I imagine the HFA could take on. Privacy and security have to be top priorities. There could be a password-protected web page accessible only by those who have submitted contact information, a mention of paper-trail HATCHER ancestry, and names of web sites where DNA results are available. Further information could be exchanged by e-mail, with no further burden on HFA. On 8/13/19, Bill Schultz <elbonian@live.com> wrote: > Steve: > > We would be happy to track GEDmatch account numbers for anybody who is in > any of our trees at http://hatcherfamilyassn.com/index.php > > HOWEVER, we only track non-Hatcher surnames up and down one generation from > the Hatcher spouse. Thus, while I'm on GEDmatch, I'm not in the Hatcher > family tree (t being my 2nd-great grandmother who was born a Hatcher). > > Our Hatcher DNA project is over at Family Tree DNA, and we have a lot of > folks there, but we can't take their data and upload it to GEDmatch without > permission. And, I really don't care to start another "DNA project" at > GEDmatch. I see it as a less-secure repository than any of the others. But > I'll admit they currently have better tools. But they don't advertise, so it > is kind-of a DNA geek site. I would expect that Family Tree DNA and/or > Ancestry (where I've also tested) would eventually catch up on the tool > front. Ancestry just recently released its "ThruLines" feature that matches > DNA and family trees to create an otherwise impossible map of your > relatives. I personally feel that is a LOT more useful than the great tools > at GEDmatch. > > William Watson and I are still in the early stages of considering what we > will do with an autosomal DNA project. We've been allowing people to join > our Hatcher project, and we've looked at their DNA, but we don't really have > a good idea of what to do about it. Stay tuned. Maybe next year...... > > == Bill

    08/13/2019 02:52:40
    1. [HATCHER] Re: Early English Hatchers
    2. Anthony Barreto-Neto
    3. Hey y’all I’ve got both the Y test and would be happy to have an autosomal test. My problem is getting them uploaded. As far as permission to upload “for me” to whichever ones you want, you have it. I can also put it in writing signed with online app. Let me know. I’m only in the Hatcher family tree site now. Thanks Tony If you don't wake up every morning Willing to die for what you believe in Then you don't believe in anything Sent from my iPad > On Aug 13, 2019, at 9:52 PM, Steve Williams <stevewilliamsfamily@gmail.com> wrote: > > The potential role that I see for HFA is as a forum to allow > individuals who have submitted DNA samples (whether "DNA geek" or > novice) to find each other. The amount of work involved in evaluating > autosomal DNA matches (and lack thereof) is far beyond what I imagine > the HFA could take on. Privacy and security have to be top > priorities. There could be a password-protected web page accessible > only by those who have submitted contact information, a mention of > paper-trail HATCHER ancestry, and names of web sites where DNA results > are available. Further information could be exchanged by e-mail, with > no further burden on HFA. > > > > > >> On 8/13/19, Bill Schultz <elbonian@live.com> wrote: >> Steve: >> >> We would be happy to track GEDmatch account numbers for anybody who is in >> any of our trees at http://hatcherfamilyassn.com/index.php >> >> HOWEVER, we only track non-Hatcher surnames up and down one generation from >> the Hatcher spouse. Thus, while I'm on GEDmatch, I'm not in the Hatcher >> family tree (t being my 2nd-great grandmother who was born a Hatcher). >> >> Our Hatcher DNA project is over at Family Tree DNA, and we have a lot of >> folks there, but we can't take their data and upload it to GEDmatch without >> permission. And, I really don't care to start another "DNA project" at >> GEDmatch. I see it as a less-secure repository than any of the others. But >> I'll admit they currently have better tools. But they don't advertise, so it >> is kind-of a DNA geek site. I would expect that Family Tree DNA and/or >> Ancestry (where I've also tested) would eventually catch up on the tool >> front. Ancestry just recently released its "ThruLines" feature that matches >> DNA and family trees to create an otherwise impossible map of your >> relatives. I personally feel that is a LOT more useful than the great tools >> at GEDmatch. >> >> William Watson and I are still in the early stages of considering what we >> will do with an autosomal DNA project. We've been allowing people to join >> our Hatcher project, and we've looked at their DNA, but we don't really have >> a good idea of what to do about it. Stay tuned. Maybe next year...... >> >> == Bill > > _______________________________________________ > Welcome to the Hatcher Mail list. Please contact Rena Worthen doreatr@yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Email preferences: http://bit.ly/rootswebpref > Unsubscribe https://lists.rootsweb.com/postorius/lists/hatcher@rootsweb.com > Privacy Statement: https://ancstry.me/2JWBOdY Terms and Conditions: https://ancstry.me/2HDBym9 > Rootsweb Blog: http://rootsweb.blog > RootsWeb is funded and supported by Ancestry.com and our loyal RootsWeb community

    08/19/2019 10:07:52