He owned property in Middletown, Bucks county at the time of his marriage and there was a Quaker meeting there, but he is not mentioned. Ann was of dutch descent and probably belonged to the Dutch Reformed church. Also, they were "married contrary to discipline" and thus would have been disowned and it would have been recorded. Fairfax FMM [Friends' Monthly Meeting], Loudoun county, Virginia: HATCHER 29 June 1754 - William and younger children were received into membership by request 29-6-1754; his wife Ann and daughter Mary received [into membership] on request 31 Aug. 1754 - his wife Ann and daughter Mary were received into membership by request, in women's meeting. If William or Ann had been members in good standing, they would have been recieved by certificate. Since the above was by request, NOTE: See ??? William HATCHER, born before. 21 February 1706/07, (12 mo 1706 os date he was baptized) Marnhull parish, Dorset county, England, in this file. I have NO proof that this William HATCHER is the same person as our William HATCHER, but he was born at about the same time, and our William HATCHER descendants EXACTLY match the DNA of the descendants of this William HATCHER's great grandfather of Marnhull, Dorset, England. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: <BurnJi@aol.com> To: <hatcher@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 11:30 AM Subject: Re: [HATCHER] A question for our Quakers........... >I just noticed that in re-reading his will. What is the earliest you have > found Hatchers in Quaker records? > > Burnis > > > > **************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with > Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. > (http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002) > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > HATCHER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >