HATCHER website: http://hatcherfamilyassn.com HALL DNA project: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~nhatcher/hall/HDNAtest.htm "One of the tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a brutal gang of facts" - La Rochefoucauld Folks, I think I've found an error in connections for one of our testers, We have Josh [4942] descending thru Julius, s/o Hen/Marg and James [113640] descending thru Henry bn 1755, s/o Josiah. Josh and James both show the same mutation. Josh claims descent thru Henry/Lound's line while James claims descent thru Ben/Liz's line. This mutation does not appear in the results of proven Ben/Liz descendants of Henry. Josh's tree is much more provable than is James' tree. James' Henry bn 1755 is the RW vet who md Nancy Haskins. His recs begin in the 1810 KY census. How he got connected as Josiah's son is not at all clear nor does it appear to be proven. I have to say that RW Henry is likely s/o Henry IV, s/o Henry/Marg and belongs to the Henry/Lound line. Considering the fact we have so many Henrys from 2 different lines living so near each other, it does not surprise me that a wrong connection was made. Nel