Well, tradition has been on mailing lists that discussion about lines other than the one the list is designated for should be done in personal E-mail. That could be the reason you are seeing things addressed to individuals. This is the HART (and other spellings of same) List. Most of us know nothing about your London's. I am not trying to be rude, Just explaining how "Surname" lists are traditionally operated. Good luck, Lynn On Sat, 14 Nov 1998 22:16:45 -0800, you wrote: >Hello all, > >Here's a basic question. If I send an e-mail to the listbot, do all of >you receive it? You seem to be addressing each other individually. >Sorry for the basic question. > >Today, I went to the LDS family history center and filled in the >paperwork for the rest of the Jeremaih London Source I mentioned. It is >called "Building our Pedigree," not "Buiding our Degree," as I told you >earlier. > >I've looked in the archives. Obviously, every message isn't stored >there. Can someone sum up for me the basis for the idea that the Ont. >Londons and the NB Londons are related. > >And here's a puzzler. I'm delighted to be amoung you but I'm not sure I >understand the relationship between the first Jeremiah London and John >London of New Jersey. The data is probably in the messages that aren't >in the archive. > >One of you asked for my line >(first) Jeremiah London- Margaret Pral >Richard London- Maria >(third) Jeremiah London-Phoebe Cutler >Mary Mariah London-Nicholas Hartt >Edward N. Hartt-Harriett Legg >George Basil Hartt-Florence Ann Amelia McDonald >Harold Hartt Helen Louis Collins >Susan Hartt Scott Ewbank > >Someone asked about a Bartholomew London. "Building our Degree" says >that a Bartholomew London was one of the first Jeremiah's sons and a >brother of the Richard above. There is a separate chapter for him in >the part of the book that I've sent for. > >Best to all >Susan Hartt > >______________________________ -- * [email protected] Researching: DRAKE, HULSEY, SHOCKLEY, ROGERS, BAIN. --