Please, respond, directly to Joyce at jebrown@ecity.net, as she is not a member of the Hancock list. Julia In a message dated 05/05/2001 7:29:04 PM Central Daylight Time, jebrown@ecity.net writes: > > During a recent visit to Falls Church, VA. I acquired at an auction four > tintypes, three in small paper folders with one stuck in with another. On > the back of one of a man is written: "A. L. Hancock, ca. 1900, D. C. > Fireman". On another, the one with two, is written Katie and Albert > Hancock. One of these is of a couple in 1900 era swimwear, the other is a > formal portrait, possible a wedding picture. She is standing, he is > seated. The fourth is a studio portrait of a woman in a light fancy blouse > and long dark skirt with a rather fancy hat. No name - doesn't look like > Katie, but could be I suppose. I would like to reunite these pictures with > their family. I paid $20.00 for a four and would appreciate reimbursement. > BTW, the one of the man alone is in bad shape. > Please e-mail me at jebrown@ecity.net as I am not a regular subscriber > of this list. Best Regards, Joyce in Iowa >

I do believe that the Albert may of been son of Absolom Hancock of Baltimore and may hook up with a Charles Hancock that was born in Baltimore but later went to Iowa and married.Good luck and I hope someone will claim them ----- Original Message ----- From: <JULIAFWOOD@aol.com> To: <HANCOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 9:29 PM Subject: [HANCOCK-L] Re: {not a subscriber} Albert and Katie HANCOCK c. 1900 > Please, respond, directly to Joyce at jebrown@ecity.net, as she is not a > member of the Hancock list. > Julia > > In a message dated 05/05/2001 7:29:04 PM Central Daylight Time, > jebrown@ecity.net writes: > > > > > During a recent visit to Falls Church, VA. I acquired at an auction four > > tintypes, three in small paper folders with one stuck in with another. On > > the back of one of a man is written: "A. L. Hancock, ca. 1900, D. C. > > Fireman". On another, the one with two, is written Katie and Albert > > Hancock. One of these is of a couple in 1900 era swimwear, the other is a > > formal portrait, possible a wedding picture. She is standing, he is > > seated. The fourth is a studio portrait of a woman in a light fancy blouse > > and long dark skirt with a rather fancy hat. No name - doesn't look like > > Katie, but could be I suppose. I would like to reunite these pictures with > > their family. I paid $20.00 for a four and would appreciate reimbursement. > > BTW, the one of the man alone is in bad shape. > > Please e-mail me at jebrown@ecity.net as I am not a regular subscriber > > of this list. Best Regards, Joyce in Iowa > > > > > > > ==== HANCOCK Mailing List ==== > Questions about this list? Feel free to contact > the listowner for help at: > <JuliaFWood@aol.com>