Hi Folks, As an "old" Hancock on the list let me say that the project the members of the committee put together was a tremendous effort on the part of Julia, Lisa, and John (hope I didn't leave one out!) to bring all of our Hancock information to one site. Considering the fact none of them live in the same city---not to mention part of the U.S. I think they did a wonderful job. At no time did I think that their efforts and the results would be definitive. I felt that each chart would be open to interpretation by individuals and that we would need to contact the person who sent in the chart should a question arise. I do think that Ardath had a very good suggestion about printing all the charts (1A, 1B, etc.) as they were sent in---warts and all and letting each Hancock who looked at them make their own decision about interpretation. However, I understood that what the committee was trying to do was to take out duplications within each chart. I also thought, as John said, that the members of the committee were facilitators not arbitrators---although I do think they were often forced into that position by other members of the list. At no time was I under the impression that the committee members accepted or rejected data according to their interpretations, needs, wants, etc.---and I know they did not do that. I did not know that the committee members were being attacked and I am so sorry to hear that some folks from such a great family saw fit to do so. I wish I had known that at the time as it looks like they could have stood some "defending"! Just my 2¢ worth. And, if you want to flame me, please feel free to do so---privately. I not only have a thick skin, I have a really good fire extinguisher!<LOLOL> Jean in TX