RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [HANCOCK-L] Re: Major III
    2. Greg and Nancy Whitlock
    3. There is a Major Hancock listed in the tax records for Patrick County Virginia from 1794 through 1814. Other Hancock's include: Benjamin, Absalom, William, John from 1791-1802. In 1802, there was also a John Jr. Thomas Hancock showed up in 1812. Charles Hancock shows up in 1829, Fleming and Lewis D. Hancock in 1830, Elijah Hancock in 1836. I am looking for a Sarah Hancock who married Richard Whitlock in Patrick County in 1804. They lived in Halifax until moving to Patrick in 1810 for that year only, back to Halifax and then to Patrick in 1813. Richard died in Patrick County in 1823. Sarah Hancock Whitlock moved to Kanawha County Va/WV with several of her children in 1847. She died in Kanawha County in 1862 where her death records states she was born in Halifax County 1775. After much research, I find Richard Whitlock living in Goochland with his parents until 1795 when they moved to Halifax County. Question: Could this Sarah be the one who married James Page in Goochland in 1800? I did find that Richard Whitlock's mother was Sarah Wilburn and she had a sister who married Robert Page. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks, Greg Whitlock gwhitloc@swva.net -----Original Message----- From: Ardath Buckaway <bqueen@compusmart.ab.ca> To: HANCOCK-L@rootsweb.com <HANCOCK-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:47 PM Subject: [HANCOCK-L] Re: Major III > >Helene and all of Hancock Cousins, > >I don't know if I am about to start a Hancock Family squabble or not, but I >had all the Major Hancocks so mixed up and spent a lot of wasted time trying >to figure it all out. It ends up that I believe that the Major who was >"supposed" to have been born in 1803, is a figment of imagination. There >never was one born then. I have gone to great lengths to find the truth on >this one. Here are some of my notes. Some have been sent by numerous >researchers, and I have put them together to make some sense. > > Mary Page was first wife. The second wife was Elizabeth Page, a cousin of >Mary. >After Mary died Elizabeth (d/o Robert) married Major in 1830. > > Major 1772 married and moved to SC in 1807. He lived in Spartanburgh >untill 1840 when re moved to Hall Co GA. He left a will in Hall Co and died >there but named his children. Many researchers have the "Majors" confused. > >**The Spartanburg Co., SC census records that Mary and Major had >children---at least one son and three daughters.** > > (This is not true, there was no son, just a blot or a fly-speck on the >film. I >checked three different 1810 Census films at three locations.) Note:- This >was done by another researcher who was helping me. > >Elizabeth was eighteen years younger than her husband. They lived in >Woodruff, Spartanburg Co., SC and had one child. >(This statement is not correct either.) >The child in that home was Nancy, the daughter of Pamela, unmarried. She >later married a Truelove. > >Major's second wife, Elizabeth (age 60), was listed in the 1850 Spartanburg >Co., SC Census with Mansell and Matilda LAWSON (both age 20) living with >her<< > > Elizabeth had no children. Nancy Matilda Hancock was a granddaughter of >Major and the daughter of his (unmarried ?) daughter Pamela (Hancock) >Truelove. She lived with Major and was mentioned in his will. She married >"Emanuel" Lawson in GA and moved to SC. > > Major's birthdate is taken from the "Douglas Register" and his marriage >date from a book by Kathleen William "Goochland Co. Marriages". > Major and wife moved from Goochland Co. to Spartanburg Co. SC 1807. This is >proved by a deed he signed to Anderson Page (brother-in-law) filed in >Goochland Co. The deed bears a note "Major Hancock of Carolina" > >I have checked with many who are also researching the Page line, and the >Hancock line. The following was some of the notes: > >**This deed is very important and proves which of the various Major Hancocks >is involved . Mary's father owned a very small estate. but one item was an >odd-size parcel of land. (81 and 1/2 acres). When he died Mary inherited >one-fourth of his land and, in 1807, Major and Mary (Page) Hancock, sold >their part of the land to her brother William Page. The land was described >as being on Lickinghole Creek (one fourth part of 81 1/2 acres) "which James >Page dec'd was possessed of". This transaction is easily identified. > >** They were enumerated in Spartanburg in 1810- having: two females 0-10, >one >female 10-16, one female 26-45. (This Census copy was very difficult to read >and was thought to have shown a male child. Subsequent copies of the 1810 >Census did not show any male children) and none was enumerated in future >lists. > >** He purchased 115 acres of land in Spartanburg described as being "on >Cherokee Creek waters of Broad River". > >** In 1820 Spartanburg there is: one male over 45; two females 0-10, one >female 15-20 and one female 30-40. > >**In 1830 Spartanburg there is one male 50-60, one female 15-20 and one >female 30-40. > >** The family moved to Hall Co GA before 1840. This period is when Donald >Page >author of "History and Genealogy of Robert and Rachel Page Family" suggests >wife Mary had died and Major had married her cousin Elizabeth Page, daughter >of Robert Page. > >** In Hall Co. GA i840 Census there is: > one male 70-80, one female 5-10, one female 60-70. died in Hall Co. GA in >1850. See "History & Genealogy of of Robert and Rachel Page Family by Donald >Page. > >** Major's will was filed in Hall Co. on 31 Nov., 1845 and proved 1 Sept., >1851. The will mentions his wife Elizabeth, daughter Nancy Hancock to have >1/2 of his lot, daughter Mahala Gamblin, daughter Elizabeth Wechel, daughter >Matilda Umpheries, daughter Parmela Truelove and granddaughter Nancy Matilda >Hancock the daughter of Parmela Truelove. > >Besides the above, some have thought that Major Hancock who married >Elizabeth Fuson moved around the county. He did not. He married, and 1 >month later moved to OH, where he remained. > >All these Major Hancocks, were born so close to gether, and were named after >their father or another son of a brother which makes it difficult. > >Many of you may not agree with me, but if you do not, please present >something more plausible than what I have. > >Ardath > > > >==== HANCOCK Mailing List ==== >Thank you for your support of The HANCOCK Family Discussion List. Please post your HANCOCK folks periodically so we will all know who you are looking for. > > >

    09/04/2001 02:21:30