Regarding.... > FACT 3: Not a fact... Patrick HAMRICK Sr. did NOT inherit land from > Elizabeth DAY when she died. Patrick HAMRICK Sr went to court to claim > inheritance from Roger DAY, Elizabeth's father. Patrick basically > established that he was the only (or the closest) living relative to > Roger DAY. If PAtrick had inherited the land from Elizabeth, then a > court case would not have been needed. Perhaps a minor point, but we > need to be careful not to get the "facts" as few as there are, mixed up. > Not picking on you Jill, but want to make sure they group that claims > that Patrick married Elizabeth DAY don't have an opening that doesn't > exist. Steven, do you know what the basis was for Patrick's claiming kinship to Roger Day? How were they related? I hadn't heard of this twist until today. Thanks, Ted Smith [email protected]