Hi, there is a website with info, the only thing is error on it is the address for the museum, it should say 225 Church St, and we added a banquet for sat night, you can p/u a schedule at the museum before our tour of the old homestead, so make sure you are there before 1pm when we caravan, http://www.maui.net/~mauifun/reunion.htm cya there on the 15th~what's your name? jill ---------- : From: [email protected] : To: [email protected] : Subject: Re: [HAMRICK-L] wow, wagon ruts on old Hamrick property : Date: Tuesday, August 04, 1998 11:07 AM : : Please send me information on the Hamrick reunion in August. : I need directions too! I would love to come! : : [email protected] :

Can some one with access to the HAMBRICK book by JONES tell me what Fannie Hambricks letter on page 202-207 says about Benjamin HAMBRICK family and others in south Alabama and GA? Can not find a copy of this book at any Library in Texas. Sorry to have to ask this of group, but can someone help me? Thanks Barbara

Hi, I agree with Steve. It is not hard to come up with a large number of names after eight or more generations. Most of what Don Norman has are descendants of Joel and the rest are descendants of his brother Benjamin. I have 2,250 descendants of Joel who had 2 sons and Benjamin had 8 sons so has a much larger tree of descendants that I am working on. I would like to invite everyone to look at the Hamrick web site. If you find errors or see your family has been omitted, please send me your data. It is intended to be a reference site where you can see the relationship you have to other Hamrick's and possibly find missing cousins. http://www.cmpu.net/public/jmckinny J R

Please send me information on the Hamrick reunion in August. I need directions too! I would love to come! [email protected]

Sorry guys- didn't mean to copy that to you Bambi

Dear Carolyn, About a month ago, I requested a lookup in the above book on Hambricks. Specifically Samuel. You didn't find my Samuel, but you sent me the list of Hambricks you found. I kept it (of course), and today went back and looked again, the list didn't have Samuel, but it did have his mother who's name I didn't know. Thanks for all the help. No response necessary. Just nice to know the internet has you and others like you Bambi Woods in Florida

This is a different Jesse than my Jesse Calvert Hamrick..... jill ---------- : From: J R McKinney <[email protected]> : To: [email protected] : Subject: [HAMRICK-L] Jesse/John : Date: Monday, August 03, 1998 7:22 PM : : John Hambrick, : : At the moment I think Jesse Hambrick had son's John, Jesse, James, : and Fielding. The brothers had sons named after the other brothers : and many stayed in Scott Co, KY. Many are still living there today. : : I do not have an Abner in any descendants I have so far but there are : many grandchildren and great grandchildren I do not have yet. Of : course there are many John's. Josephine does not have an Abner : either. I feel sure you fit in this family somewhere. : : J R : :

John Hambrick, At the moment I think Jesse Hambrick had son's John, Jesse, James, and Fielding. The brothers had sons named after the other brothers and many stayed in Scott Co, KY. Many are still living there today. I do not have an Abner in any descendants I have so far but there are many grandchildren and great grandchildren I do not have yet. Of course there are many John's. Josephine does not have an Abner either. I feel sure you fit in this family somewhere. J R

4000 names does sound like a lot, but in genealogy that's not very many. I have over 1250 Hamrick marriages so with both names that is 2500 names.. plus nearly 2500 names just on the 1850 census. They mount up fast.. you could probably get close to 4000 just adding up the names associated with Joseph HAMBRICK Sr... more if we knew who some of his daughters married.... lots of names.. that is the name of the game. It gets complicated... Steven A. Bridges [email protected] Sarah Hambrick wrote: > > Great List. I hadn't seen that one before. I'm amazed, though - Almost 4000 > people and the only ancestor of mine is Patrick's youngest son Joseph..... :( > > Sarah > > Gail or Tara Reed wrote: > > > Jill, > > > > This link may help people connect their lines more, it sure helped me. > > I am new to the list so these files may already be common knowledge to > > everyone. Anyway go to http://www.rootsweb.com/~hcpd/norman/HAMRICK/. > > There are six files listed that have nearly 4000 Patrick HAMRICK > > descendants. the first file starts the tree with Patrick Hamrick and it > > proceeds to the sixth file with the more recent additions to the family. > > I found some date and place of death problems with Patrick's children > > but the lineage is correct. Steve's sight clears the date problems up. I > > hope this helps someone as much as it did me. > > > > Gail Reed > > [email protected] > > -- > Sarah E. Hambrick [email protected] > > "There's enough youth, how about a fountain of smart?" - unknown

Great List. I hadn't seen that one before. I'm amazed, though - Almost 4000 people and the only ancestor of mine is Patrick's youngest son Joseph..... :( Sarah Gail or Tara Reed wrote: > Jill, > > This link may help people connect their lines more, it sure helped me. > I am new to the list so these files may already be common knowledge to > everyone. Anyway go to http://www.rootsweb.com/~hcpd/norman/HAMRICK/. > There are six files listed that have nearly 4000 Patrick HAMRICK > descendants. the first file starts the tree with Patrick Hamrick and it > proceeds to the sixth file with the more recent additions to the family. > I found some date and place of death problems with Patrick's children > but the lineage is correct. Steve's sight clears the date problems up. I > hope this helps someone as much as it did me. > > Gail Reed > [email protected] -- Sarah E. Hambrick [email protected] "There's enough youth, how about a fountain of smart?" - unknown

bill thank you very much for the additional info on web site mary

was able to access steve bridges web page and did find the initial patrick through his son's but how do i access the additional names you mention., you mentioned about 4000 names. am learning this computer thing as i go but could use your imput what am i doing wrong. mary

We two are leaving on a lengthy trip, so I will unsubscribe for the duration of that trip. Now don't get antsy. I am going to Unsubscribe right now, forthwith and immediately, by the Technologically Proper and the Politically Correct method. Please do not post any family listings that may connect to my own family line while I am gone. Archie (That last line is intended to get a real big guffaw.)

Thanks Gail, I have seen this site also, some have reported errors to me, as with much of what is on the web. For me personally, there are so many candidates for the father of my Samuel Hambrick, (I know he connects to Patrick, I just don't know how) and it is likely to remain inconclusive unless some wonderful researcher uncovers a valuable storehouse of goodies (or one nice doc). I understand that is the way with many who research Hamrick however, ,,,,,,,you can get back so far, then the mud starts flying and pretty soon you're covered with dirt. I don't think the puzzle will unravel this weekend anyway.........I will just have to continue to note *likely candidate for father of Saml....... Perhaps if everyone who researches Hamrick will one day send their info to a central repository and someone will discern it all. Jill ;-) ---------- : From: Gail or Tara Reed <[email protected]> : To: [email protected] : Subject: Re: [HAMRICK-L] Web Page : Date: Sunday, August 02, 1998 3:31 PM : : Jill, : : This link may help people connect their lines more, it sure helped me. : I am new to the list so these files may already be common knowledge to : everyone. Anyway go to http://www.rootsweb.com/~hcpd/norman/HAMRICK/. : There are six files listed that have nearly 4000 Patrick HAMRICK : descendants. the first file starts the tree with Patrick Hamrick and it : proceeds to the sixth file with the more recent additions to the family. : I found some date and place of death problems with Patrick's children : but the lineage is correct. Steve's sight clears the date problems up. I : hope this helps someone as much as it did me. : : Gail Reed : [email protected] :

Thanks JR, this is why attachments are not allowed on our list or most responsible email lists. MOST bug announcements are baloney, but the wise email user never opens unknown attachments. If you have an attachment to send, ask the list if individuals want it, then send it only to those people who wish to receive it. I delete. Lets get back to genealogy, please.....;-) Jill ---------- : From: J R. McKinney <[email protected]> : To: [email protected] : Subject: [HAMRICK-L] Security : Date: Sunday, August 02, 1998 4:19 PM : : Hi! : : I do not like non genealogy posts but I thought this : might be significant: : : Security Bug Affects Unopened E-Mail Attachments : Malicious code may affect systems running Microsoft or Netscape e-mail. : See: http://www.pcworld.com/pcwtoday/article/0,1510,7559,00.html : : by Brian McWilliams, PC World News Radio : July 27, 1998, 3:29 p.m. PT :

Hi Mary, go to: geocities.com/Heartland/Hills/9665 Bill Hord -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, August 02, 1998 8:16 PM Subject: [HAMRICK-L] web page >would like very much to view steve bridges web page. >could some one give the the complete address. >thank you >mary > >

Hi! I do not like non genealogy posts but I thought this might be significant: Security Bug Affects Unopened E-Mail Attachments Malicious code may affect systems running Microsoft or Netscape e-mail. See: http://www.pcworld.com/pcwtoday/article/0,1510,7559,00.html by Brian McWilliams, PC World News Radio July 27, 1998, 3:29 p.m. PT Researchers in Finland have discovered a serious security flaw in e-mail software from both Microsoft and Netscape. The bug, identified by the Secure Programming Group at Finland's Oulu University, can be exploited by an attacker who sends you an e-mail message with an attachment that has an extra-long filename. The long name can cause Microsoft's Outlook 98 and Outlook Express mail programs, as well as Netscape's Messenger mail program, to crash from a buffer overflow. After that, your computer could be forced to run malicious code that's actually contained right in that long filename. The e-mail vulnerability exists on most, but not all, 32-bit Windows systems. Microsoft released a patch today for its Outlook 98 and Outlook Express e-mail clients. Netscape said it will have a patch ready in about two weeks for its Communicator suites, versions 4.05 and 4.5 beta. Qualcomm's Eudora e-mail client appears not to be affected by the bug. Both Microsoft and Netscape are urging affected users to apply the patches as soon as possible. The bug is especially pernicious because you don't actually have to open the attachment to be affected. Simply downloading the message off your mail server can cause the crash and the malicious code to execute. Russ Cooper, editor of the NT Bugtraq mailing list, says the software vendors should go even further and issue a recall of the affected programs to prevent a widespread virus or Internet worm outbreak. Note: As of 7/28, Microsoft has made the appropriate patch available to Windows 98 users as a "critical" update available by running the Windows Update utility. Netscape Security Notes See: http://home.netscape.com/products/security/resources/notes.html A vulnerability reported by researchers at Oulu University in Finland affects Netscape Communicator 4.0 to 4.05 and Netscape Communicator 4.5 Preview Release 1. An update to Communicator 4.0x will be available in the next two weeks. For more information, see the note regarding the Long Filename Mail vulnerability. http://home.netscape.com/products/security/resources/bugs/longfile.html No customer incidents have been reported to Netscape. The vulnerability could allow an email or newsgroup message with an attachment that has a very long filename to execute malicious code on your computer. In order for the malicious code to cause problems, you must select the File menu while viewing the message. Description of the Vulnerability The Long Filename Mail vulnerability can cause one or more of the following to occur when you select the File menu while viewing a message that has an attachment with a long filename: * Communicator may quit unexpectedly. * Selecting the File menu may cause malicious code to be executed on your computer. Netscape is not aware of any users who have been affected by a malicious message. HOW TO AVOID THE VULNERABILITY Until a patch is available, configure Communicator to always view attachments as links, rather than display them inline. To do so, select the appropriate command on the View menu. * In Communicator 4.0 through 4.05, select View: Attachments: As Links. * In Communicator 4.5 Preview Release 1, if your menu reads View: View Attachments Inline, select this item to toggle it to viewing attachments as links. If you view a message with an attachment that has a filename with 200 or more characters (this may appear as an attachment link that extends beyond the window width), follow these instructions: 1. Do NOT select the File menu under any circumstances when the message is selected. 2. You can save the attachment to your hard disk for viewing with another application by right-clicking on the attachment link in the message and selecting Save Link As. 3. It is recommended that you delete the message with the long filename attachment by clicking the Delete icon in the toolbar. You should delete the message whether or not you were able to save the attachment as described in the previous step. 4. If you need to exit Communicator while the suspect message is selected, click on the X icon in the upper-right corner of the window. Do not use the File menu to exit the application unless you have deleted the suspect message or have selected an alternate message. Please note that not all attachments with filenames of 200 or more characters will necessarily be malicious. Netscape recommends that users protect themselves by upgrading to a patch release for Communicator 4.0x when it is available in two weeks, or to Communicator 4.5 Preview Release 2, when it is available. Netscape believes that the following mail and news component versions are NOT affected: * Netscape Communicator 4.0 through 4.05 on Macintosh and Unix platforms * Netscape Communicator 4.5 Preview Release 1 on Macintosh and Unix platforms * Netscape Navigator 2.x and 3.x on all platforms Information on How to Obtain a Fix Netscape is testing a fix for Communicator 4.0x for Windows 3.1, 95, 98, and NT and expects to release it in the next two weeks. Check this page for details on where to download the fix for this vulnerability. For more information about security on Netscape products, visit the Security Notes page at http://home.netscape.com/products/security/resources/notes.html I do not think this is a problem but now that the news is out Hackers may try to use it to mess you up. Microsoft users need to download their patch now and Netscape in Two weeks. When I see it I will led everyone know. J R

Jill, This link may help people connect their lines more, it sure helped me. I am new to the list so these files may already be common knowledge to everyone. Anyway go to http://www.rootsweb.com/~hcpd/norman/HAMRICK/. There are six files listed that have nearly 4000 Patrick HAMRICK descendants. the first file starts the tree with Patrick Hamrick and it proceeds to the sixth file with the more recent additions to the family. I found some date and place of death problems with Patrick's children but the lineage is correct. Steve's sight clears the date problems up. I hope this helps someone as much as it did me. Gail Reed [email protected]

hi, am looking for a WILLIAM V. HAMRICK, no other info, except someone found him in the alabama 1900 census, and it said he was born in wv, i am trying to help his dau EDNA MARGARET HAMRICK, 7-27-1909 b. birmingham, ala, whom he orphaned in 1915. any links? any HAMRICKS from WV? i don't know which county, so i need a whole stae census for 1910. thanks, judi

Hey Ya'll Please help me. A friend of mine asked me to get on GED file and send him a copy of my Family tree. I did this and have lost a great deal of things that I put in in the last three months. How can I get it back? Please Help Me. Harry [email protected]