J R McKinney wrote: > Hi! > > Anyone know > > Jesse D Hamrick > Master of Grange in Amadore, CA 1874 & 1875. > > George R Hamrick, Jackson Co, CA Grange. > > Mary E Hamrick, Milliner in Columbia Center 16 miles > North East of Columbus, Ohio. (No date given) > > Hon A D Hamrick, President of the Indiana Dtate Board of > Agriculture. (Prior to 1867) His residence was > Hamrick Station, Putnam Co, Indianna also a Post office. > > J R I just returned from a trip to Indiana and Greencastle. I found the gravesite of A. D. Hamrick and took pictures also. He is buried at Boone-Hutcheson Cemetery. Very nice cemetery. The only Hamrick that I could find at that cemetery, but some markers were unreadable. I was looking in particular for Gilson or Jilson Hamrick. After I get unpacked and get my things together, I can give you location of cemetery.

Seeking contact with descendants of Michael HEMERICK died 1863 Onondaga Co, NY (name is spelled EMERICK in obit). Married (1)Eleanor "Allie" DINGS (2)Catherine. His children were: Eve Maria md Belshazzar KRUG; John 1844-1845; William 1846-1846; Henrietta 1846-1846; Almira 1847-1854; Almeda 1849-1915 md Allen MINKLER; Hiram 1850-1916 md Lovisa LYNN; Anna. Family is buried in Pine Plains Cemetery, Clay, NY.

Yes... what about them? Steve J R McKinney wrote: > > Hi! > > Anyone know > > Jesse D Hamrick > Master of Grange in Amadore, CA 1874 & 1875. > > George R Hamrick, Jackson Co, CA Grange. > > Mary E Hamrick, Milliner in Columbia Center 16 miles > North East of Columbus, Ohio. (No date given) > > Hon A D Hamrick, President of the Indiana Dtate Board of > Agriculture. (Prior to 1867) His residence was > Hamrick Station, Putnam Co, Indianna also a Post office. > > J R

Hi! Anyone know Jesse D Hamrick Master of Grange in Amadore, CA 1874 & 1875. George R Hamrick, Jackson Co, CA Grange. Mary E Hamrick, Milliner in Columbia Center 16 miles North East of Columbus, Ohio. (No date given) Hon A D Hamrick, President of the Indiana Dtate Board of Agriculture. (Prior to 1867) His residence was Hamrick Station, Putnam Co, Indianna also a Post office. J R

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_907115205_boundary Content-ID: <[email protected]_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Some additional information for the "group". Harley In a message dated 98-09-28 23:12:39 EDT, [email protected] write Date: 98-09-28 23:12:39 EDT From: [email protected] (Margaret A Loftus) To: [email protected] I am dau of Arden TAYLOR (1900-1977) who is son of Corilla Mae (Cora) HAMRICK(1866-1943), who is dau of Celesta WREN(1843-1881) and George Richard HAMRICK(1840-1881) who is son of Nathaniel HAMRICK(1790-1865) and Mariah ADAMS(1797-1868). They are buried in California. I have Family Group Sheets and a journal written by Geo HAMRICK on his trek West in 1863 to Ca. His bro Jesse, came to Ca in 1853. Hope we can connect! Am trying to find origin of the HAMRICKS and arrival in US. Margaret Loftus (Peg) >> --part0_907115205_boundary Content-ID: <[email protected]_out.mail.juno.com.2> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from relay21.mx.aol.com (relay21.mail.aol.com [172.31.106.67]) by air08.mail.aol.com (v50.15) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:12:39 -0400 Received: from x2.boston.juno.com (x2.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.21]) by relay21.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id XAA08902 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:11:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from [email protected]) by x2.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id DQAJHZ5R; Mon, 28 Sep 1998 23:10:43 EDT To: [email protected] Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 21:07:49 -0600 Subject: Re: HAMRICK Surname Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Juno 1.49 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 6-7,9-13 From: [email protected] (Margaret A Loftus) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit I am dau of Arden TAYLOR (1900-1977) who is son of Corilla Mae (Cora) HAMRICK(1866-1943), who is dau of Celesta WREN(1843-1881) and George Richard HAMRICK(1840-1881) who is son of Nathaniel HAMRICK(1790-1865) and Mariah ADAMS(1797-1868). They are buried in California. I have Family Group Sheets and a journal written by Geo HAMRICK on his trek West in 1863 to Ca. His bro Jesse, came to Ca in 1853. Hope we can connect! Am trying to find origin of the HAMRICKS and arrival in US. Margaret Loftus (Peg) ________________________________________________________________ Why pay more to use the Internet? Get fast, reliable, affordable Web access >From Juno, the world's second largest online service. Download your free software <a href="http://www.juno.com/getit.a.html">here</a>. --part0_907115205_boundary--

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_907114963_boundary Content-ID: <[email protected]_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Hello Friends and fellow researchers. I received the attached from Peg Loftus a HAMRICK Decendent. She has a lot of information and a "new" line at least for me. Jill she is very interested in the Hamricks in your line because her Richard is the brother to your Jesse Calvert. Please drop her an e-mail and cc: me "Tico" as I hope that this is a new family friend for us. Thanks, Harley & Jeanne (Hamrick) Briden In a message dated 98-09-29 18:55:42 EDT, [email protected] writes: << Subj: Re: HAMRICK Surname Date: 98-09-29 18:55:42 EDT From: [email protected] (Margaret A Loftus) To: [email protected] Dear Sixth Cousin! Can't tell you how excited I was to get your e-mail this pm. I have just begun to look for relatives and the Internet is a completely new experience for me! All of my research up until now (you) has been done in archives, libraries, graveyards and such. It seems almost too good to be true that there is someone else in the world looking and researching the same field. I would be most appreciative of any leads you can give. If you have an interest in the Journal of George HAMRICK, I would be glad to share it with you. It makes mention of Jesse Calvert. I have been to Ione and taken pictures of the graves. If you could put me in touch with others who are searching the HAMRICK line. I would most deeply grateful. 'til later, Peg Loftus >> --part0_907114963_boundary Content-ID: <[email protected]_out.mail.juno.com.2> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from rly-ya03.mx.aol.com (rly-ya03.mail.aol.com [172.18.144.195]) by air-ya02.mx.aol.com (v50.15) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 18:55:42 -0400 Received: from x2.boston.juno.com (x2.boston.juno.com [205.231.101.21]) by rly-ya03.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id SAA12743 for <[email protected]>; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 18:55:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from [email protected]) by x2.boston.juno.com (queuemail) id DQCM72PW; Tue, 29 Sep 1998 18:53:39 EDT To: [email protected] Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 16:50:47 -0600 Subject: Re: HAMRICK Surname Message-ID: <[email protected]> References: <[email protected]> X-Mailer: Juno 1.49 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0,13 From: [email protected] (Margaret A Loftus) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Dear Sixth Cousin! Can't tell you how excited I was to get your e-mail this pm. I have just begun to look for relatives and the Internet is a completely new experience for me! All of my research up until now (you) has been done in archives, libraries, graveyards and such. It seems almost too good to be true that there is someone else in the world looking and researching the same field. I would be most appreciative of any leads you can give. If you have an interest in the Journal of George HAMRICK, I would be glad to share it with you. It makes mention of Jesse Calvert. I have been to Ione and taken pictures of the graves. If you could put me in touch with others who are searching the HAMRICK line. I would most deeply grateful. 'til later, Peg Loftus ________________________________________________________________ Why pay more to use the Internet? Get fast, reliable, affordable Web access >From Juno, the world's second largest online service. Download your free software <a href="http://www.juno.com/getit.a.html">here</a>. --part0_907114963_boundary--

I may have found my Burwell H. Hambrick in the 1840 Cherokee County AL Census but I would like some comments on it. I have found a B. H. Hambright (not Hambrick) with the following entries: 2M=under 5, 1M=5-10, 1M=30-40, 1F=5-10 and 1F=20-30 The ages, sexes and total number of persons totally agree with my Burwell Hambrick family for 1840. Someone please comment on the probability of this being Burwell Hambrick. There was also a C. Hambrick in the Cherokee County 1840 Census with the following entries: 1M=under 5, 1M=20-30, 1F=5-10, 2F=20-30, 1F=40-50 I am wondering if this is a relative. Does anyone know who this C. Hambrick is? Thanks for all comments. Ike Porter

Sarah, Did any of your relatives ever live in Pike or Bledsoe County, TN.? Dennis K. Hamrick

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------26F88FB963BDA506FB0E93A3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I just HAD to send this along to you guys!!!! You'll really appreciate it!!! Sarah - who's busily trying to find one guy born in a foreign country 100 years ago & track down his brother living descendants -- Sarah E. Hambrick [email protected] "There's enough youth, how about a fountain of smart?" - unknown --------------26F88FB963BDA506FB0E93A3 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from mail-gw1adm.rcsntx.swbell.net (mail-gw1adm.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.60.101]) by mail1.rcsntx.swbell.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA07080 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:48:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from fp-1.rootsweb.com (fp-1.rootsweb.com [207.113.233.233]) by mail-gw1adm.rcsntx.swbell.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA11313 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:48:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from [email protected]) by fp-1.rootsweb.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA17781; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <[email protected]> From: "Beth Breisch" <[email protected]> Old-To: "Hale" <[email protected]>, "chastain list" <[email protected]> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 1998 21:59:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Subject: [HALE-L] "You Know You're Taking Genealogy Too Serious if .........." Resent-Message-ID: <"J667v.A.kVE.65pB2"@fp-1.rootsweb.com> To: [email protected] Resent-From: [email protected] X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/636 X-Loop: [email protected] Precedence: list Resent-Sender: [email protected] Thought you guys might enjoy this.... Beth -----Original Message----- >> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 19:31:33 EDT >> >> You Know You're Taking Genealogy Too Seriously If .. >> >> In order to put the "final touches" on your genealogical research, >> you've asked all of your closest relatives to provide DNA samples. >> >> You are the only person to show up at the cemetery research party >> with a shovel. >> >> You were instrumental in having "non-genealogical use of the genealogy >> room copy machine" classified as a federal hate crime. >> >> Your house leans slightly toward the side where your genealogical >> records are stored. >> >> You decided to take a two-week break from genealogy, and the U.S. Postal >> Office immediately laid off 1,500 employees. >> >> Out of respect for your best friend's unquestioned reputation for honesty >> and integrity, you are willing to turn off that noisy surveillance camera >> while she reviews your 57 genealogical research notebooks in your home. >> The armed security guard, however, will remain. >> >> You plod merrily along "refining" your recently published family history, >> blissfully unaware that the number of errata pages now far exceeds the >> number of pages in your original publication. >> >> During an ice storm and power outage, you ignore the pleas of your >> shivering spouse and place your last quilt around that 1886 photograph >> of dear Uncle George. >> >> The most recent document in your "Missing Ancestors" file is a 36-page >> contract between you and Johnson Billboard Advertising Company. >> >> Ed McMahon, several t.v. cameras and an envelope from Publishers >> Clearing House arrive at your front door on Super Bowl Sunday, and the >> first thing you say is, "Are you related to the McMahons of Ohio?". >> >> "A Loving Family" and "Financial Security" have moved up to second and >> third, respectively, on your list of life's goals, but still lag far >> behind "Owning My Own Microfilm Reader." >> >> A magical genie appears and agrees to grant your any one wish, and you >> ask that the 1890 census be restored. ==== HALE Mailing List ==== Get the most from your queries. Remember to include all known dates and place names. --------------26F88FB963BDA506FB0E93A3--

No problem Joan, I'm on the job! You were subbed under startext...... Hurry back! Jill

Jill - Help me I am trying to unsubscribe for awhile....will be out of town...I have sent the request and have been told I am not on the list. I do receive all the mail so I know I am subscribed. I have successfully done this in the past. The problem is with my server who sometimes sends messages as [email protected] and sometimes [email protected] never have figured why. Anyway, I may be on the list as [email protected] and am now sending under [email protected] A mess I know... Thanks, Joan

Steven, What is your source for the birthdate of "my" Burrell H. Hambrick being born in 1810? I have seen in several places that his birthdate is referenced as 1790 or 1795. It would help clear some of my confusion up greatly if this birthdate has a primary source. Thanks. Also, if the Burwell mentioned in Tressie's data was born in 1788, he would have been 17 in the 1805 bid for guardianship by his brother. In those days and location, was "legal age" 18 or 21? If it was 18, it just seems needless for his brother to have become guardian of him and paid a $500 bond right before he reached his majority. Unless, of course, there was a lot more than $160 at stake which was the amount mentioned in the court records. Thanks again for everyone's help. The Hambrick end of my research is very new for our branch of the family. And GA isn't always the easiest location to research, but have run into lots of helpful people. Kathy in Florida [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 1998 8:52 PM Subject: Re: [HAMRICK-L] some big time confusion!!! >Michael A Martinez wrote: >> >> Ike and others............... >> >> I have posted in the past that I am the descendant of Berrell Hampton >> Hambrick, born about 1790 who married Elizabeth. I have confirmation >> of this. But in trying to find out who Berrell H. Hambrick's parents >> were I have run into some confusion. >> >> [email protected] sent me some info on a Burwell Hambrick who was under >> the guardianship of his brother Joseph (ca. 1805) in Jackson Co, GA. >> Joseph and this Burwell's father was a Thomas Hambrick. >> >> I was wondering if anyone had connected this Thomas Hambrick with the >> Thomas Hamrick (abt 1757 - 1798) who was married to Sarah Scurlock and >> was the son of Joseph Hamrick who married Margaret. >> >> Are those two Thomas's the same person or is it just a matter of >> coincidence that, because Thomas Hamrick died in 1798 that any >> underage children would have needed a guardian. Am I even on the >> right track? I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Any other >> leads would keep me jumping. Right now I am at a dead end with this. >> We can trace him back to GA and with that the info stops (or least the >> info that we have found thus far). >> >> Thanks for all of your continued help and suggestions. >> >> Kathy in Florida [email protected] > >Kathy, > >First of all, you need to look at a few facts, then you can put an end >to your question. Burwell HAMRICK, son of Thomas & Sarah (SCURLOCK) >HAMRICK, was born circa 1788... your Burwell HAMRICK was born circa 1810 >not 1790. They are NOT the same people. Period. > >Your Burwell could easily be a son of any of Thomas & Sarah's sons. Is >he? We don't know. We know that he is NOT the son of Thomas' son John. >He is not the son of Thomas' son James as he had a son named Burwell, >but he was born in 1823. We don't know for sure what happened to sons >William and Burwell although evidence has implied they were killed >during the War of 1812. There seems to be some doubt about some of that >data. Joseph would appear to be the best bet as a father because he was >in DeKalb County, GA in 1830, but there has been no further information >to indicate he had a son named Burwell. > >There are other HAMRICK families in Georgia which also could fit your >Burwell into them. Without a lot more digging into Georgia records we >may never be able to piece together some of these families and figure >out whom belongs to whom. > >As far as trying to tie to Thomas' son Burwell, you are barking up the >wrong tree. You need to concentrate on other possibilities. While we >cannot always say who someone belongs to, we can at times tell you who >they do not belong to. > >You can ask Ike, JR or any other HAMRICK researcher, but I would bet >that none of them know as much about as many lines as Tressie. She is >conservative on her perdictions because she is careful not to jump to >conclusions. I would trust her judgement. > >Steven A. Bridges >[email protected]

Tressie, How do you know that Burwell, son of Thomas, died in the war of 1812? Is he listed someplace that way? I have been trying to piece all the information that people on the Hamrick list have so kindly passed my way. With rootsweb being down, my posts have gone unanswered to the list, so I thought I would try and post individually. My Berrell H. Hambrick seems to have sprung from no where other than "of Dekald co., GA". Some of the dates that have been passed along to me mesh so neatly with what I DO know that it is almost too tempting to assume that my Berrell and your Burwell are the same person. Back to my original question, is he listed as dead on any 1812 list. If he isn't, why the assumption that he was killed in action? Just wondering and trying to clear up my own questions before I go down any other road of possibility. Kathy in Florida [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, August 27, 1998 4:27 PM Subject: [HAMRICK-L] Re: Burwell H. Hambrick >1850 Tallapossa Co AL, Nov 7, Page 47 {don't have him in 1840 and should >Burwell H. Hambrick 40 GA be in AL by then!!!!} >Elizabeth 39 GA >Nancy T 18 GA >George B 16 GA >Burwell 13 AL >Thomas 10 AL >John 8 AL >Sarah 5 AL >Georganus (?) 3 AL > >1860 VanZandt Co TX, 26 June, Page 25 >B. H. Hambric 49 GA >E. 48 GA >Thos 20 AL >John 17 AL >Elizabeth 15 AL {Sarah} >Georgia A. 12 AL >James 4 TX >Russell Gilbert 28 GA overseer > >George H Greenwood to Antoynette Hambrick, 24 Dec 1865, Panola Co TX > Think this is Antoinette Boynton's second marriage. > > Your Burwell/Berrell is not the Burwell I had in mind, the son of James and >Mary Bankston Hambrick. The name Burwell was very popular in the Thomas and >Sarah (Scurlock) Hambrick line. > Thomas and Sarah had 5 sons: Joseph born 1778-80 married Nancy lived in >Henry and DeKalb Co GA. John born 24 Mar 1786 m Catherine Myers d Lauderdale >Co MS; James m 1806 Clarke Co GA to Mary Bankston died in MS; William and >Burwell. The last two have no known heirs, believe the died during the war of >1812. > Hope this helps. Tressie >

Ike and others............... I have posted in the past that I am the descendant of Berrell Hampton Hambrick, born about 1790 who married Elizabeth. I have confirmation of this. But in trying to find out who Berrell H. Hambrick's parents were I have run into some confusion. [email protected] sent me some info on a Burwell Hambrick who was under the guardianship of his brother Joseph (ca. 1805) in Jackson Co, GA. Joseph and this Burwell's father was a Thomas Hambrick. I was wondering if anyone had connected this Thomas Hambrick with the Thomas Hamrick (abt 1757 - 1798) who was married to Sarah Scurlock and was the son of Joseph Hamrick who married Margaret. Are those two Thomas's the same person or is it just a matter of coincidence that, because Thomas Hamrick died in 1798 that any underage children would have needed a guardian. Am I even on the right track? I would love to hear your thoughts on this. Any other leads would keep me jumping. Right now I am at a dead end with this. We can trace him back to GA and with that the info stops (or least the info that we have found thus far). Thanks for all of your continued help and suggestions. Kathy in Florida [email protected]

The two Burwell's are different people. Tressie

Our list is up and running again, along with the other gen lists on Rootsweb, the rootsweb server was down for several days but its back now. Aloha, Jill

David Frazee wrote: > > Daisey HAMRICK b. ca 1872 in Frederick Co., MD. Census records for 1880 has > her as a granddaughter of Ezra MICHAEL. Later in his will in 1895 he lists > her as granddaughter, Daisey, wife of Samuel HARNISH. "Micall, Daisy to > Harnish, Samuel A. 14 Oct 1890; this was located in one of the marriage > books. Trying to locate infor. as to which of Ezra's daughters was Daisey's > mother. > > Carolyn at the e-mail address of: [email protected] What makes you believe Daisy's last name was HAMRICK and not MICHAEL? The marriage record you quote would imply her maiden name was MICHAEL or MICALL mispelled. Daisy obviously was not married prior to Samuel HARNISH so what was her maiden name. Have you checked Frederick County, MD marriages from 1865 to 1872 to see if a MICHAEL/MICALL female married... or married a HAMRICK? There are no intermarriages prior to 1865. Chances are that Ezra's daughter was living with him in 1870 and married in 1870 or 1871, and perhaps died at birth. I would get the names of his daughters from the 1850, 1860 and 1870 censuses, and see which ones you cannot account for... based upon his will and the 1880 census and marriage records. This might lead to an answer to your question. Steven A. Bridges [email protected]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------54CE3A20326A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps someone can forward this note which was returned to the proper person. People need to check their return email address in their browser to make sure it is sent properly so a reply can be made. Steve --------------54CE3A20326A Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <> Received: from dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.2]) by ixmail6.ix.netcom.com (8.8.7-s-4/8.8.7/(NETCOM v1.01)) with ESMTP id PAA24891; for <[email protected]>; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with internal id RAB27139; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:08:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:08:47 -0500 (CDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]> Message-Id: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: Returned mail: <@bigsky.net>... user address required Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) The original message was received at Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:08:41 -0500 (CDT) from [email protected] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <@bigsky.net> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 553 <@bigsky.net>... user address required ----- Original message follows ----- Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: (from [email protected]) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA27139 for <@bigsky.net>; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:08:41 -0500 (CDT) From: [email protected] Received: from eve-wa6-48.ix.netcom.com(206.217.122.112) by dfw-ix2.ix.netcom.com via smap (V1.3) id rma027114; Thu Sep 10 17:08:16 1998 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:10:20 -0700 Reply-To: [email protected] X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: @bigsky.net Subject: Re: Johnson Surname References: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Laura and Scott Becker wrote: > > Hey Steven! My name is Laura. I am looking for marriage information for > Willifred and Nellie Johnson BECKER. They were married in Redfield, SD on > December 24, 1925. Could you please help? Do you have any information to > share. I also know Nellie JOHNSON was born in Alpena, SD March 2, 1907. > > I would truly appreciate your help! > > Thanks! > Laura Laura, I do not have any information concerning Spink County in my possession. If you would like a copy of the marriage record for Willifred Becker and Nellie Johnson, then write to: Clerk of the Courts Spink County Court House Redfield, SD 57469 Send a money order for $4.00 for a non-certified copy, $7 for a certified copy. They can refund any overpayment. Ask for a complete copy of the certificate and license if possible. Also send a self-addressed, stamped business size envelope for their reply. As for Nellie's birth record, write to: Clerk of Courts Jerauld County Court House Wessington Springs, SD 57382 Include a SASE (business size) and a money order for $7.00 for a certified copy. Provide the exact date and place of the birth and as much other data as possible. Also include your direct relationship to this person and whether the person is still living. If Nellie is still living, you might have to send for it under her name. It is very possible that there was a delayed birth certificate filed in the 1920's or 1930's so make sure they check those records also. You may learn more if you look for Nellie on the 1910 Jerauld County, SD census in Alpena as a young child with her parents. Good chance they stayed put at least three years. You could also check for Willifred BECKER as a child on the 1920 Spink County, SD census with his parents. Hope this helps. Steven A. Bridges [email protected] --------------54CE3A20326A--

I just came across your e-mail address on a Web site. Apparently you have an interest in people finding out about you. Let me suggest a few directories that you may use for FREE advertising and exposure. (You may list yourself on these directories even if you don't have a Web page. And, there is absolutely no fee or strings attached.) National Business Directory http://www.newquestcity.com/dir.htm National Community Directory http://www.newquestcity.com/comdir.htm National Realty Directory http://www.newquestcity.com/natdir.htm These directories allow you to classify your organization or business in one of over 1,000 categories. Your listing appears simultaneously in one of the over 3,500 New Quest City community or business directories. You may post your listing in more than one city or nationally. (http://www.newquestcity.com) To make your posting simply find other listings in your category. On the results page you will find a link for submitting your listing. Remember that this is a totally FREE service. You may also wish to visit and place a FREE classified on the National Classified Directory at: http://www.newquestcity.com/natclass.htm I am contacting you because I think these directories are something that you will benefit from. If for some reason I have contacted you in error, please accept my sincere apology. Unless you respond, I will make the utmost effort to ensure that I never contacted you again. Nevertheless, I do hope that you take the time to visit New Quest City and review our programs and features. (While this e-mail is not a commercial solicitation (this is a FREE offer with no attempt being made to solicit a financial transaction), I do want to give you the "legal" information that is required under pending legislation. The source of this e-mail is New Quest City, 1302 Noble Street, Ste. 1A, Anniston, AL 36201. 256-235-1945. As you are automatically blocked from future notifications, there is no need to respond to request removal.) Thanks. Sincerely, Frank [email protected]

Michael A Martinez wrote: > Just clearing up a few posts that I'm not sure that I answered. > Concerning Berrell Hampton Hambrick, it has been pretty well > documented that he was born in GA. His oldest son, George B. > Hambrick, was born in GA; then, the next couple of children were born > in AL and the youngest in , Van Zandt, TX. George B. Hambrick was in > the Civil War. If your interested can get you the info/source. > George B. Hambrick married a Boynton (this family was also from the GA > area and is even better documented than my Hambrick line). > > Would be glad to hear of any more information that has been found. > Clearly, I'm having trouble with this line. Never hit such a hard > brick wall in all my life!! Am I'm not the only one. Several other > researchers on my side are being stumped by this group. GA is like a > great black pit for my research. I have been stumped by a lot of > people from this area. > > Again, thanks for all the info so far and please keep me posted and > let me know if I can help further this line! > > Kathy in Florida [email protected] > > -----Original Message----- > From: J R McKinney <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, August 27, 1998 11:38 PM > Subject: [HAMRICK-L] William > > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > >--------------F5DC64FB6D7A2CEAA8F48FC8 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > >Tressie et al, > > > >I am working on the possibility that William s/o Thomas > >Hamrick and Sarah Scurlock had several children. One of > >which was Benjamin b 1800. (see following tentative line) > > > >They had other children whose names I do not have. It is > >possible since William had a brother Burwell that he could > >have had a son Berrell Hampton Hamrick b 1810 in AL. > >(I agree with Tressie that he was probably born in Al not GA) > >I have William died in 1812 so could have had a son in 1810. > > > >I had that John Hamrick b 1786 (brother of William) was married > >to Catherine "Katie" Hampton but Tressie says it was Myers. > >That suggests that there was a Hampton somewhere to become > >Berrell's middle name. > > > >Please add any corrections and additions. This is just a > >"Work in Progress" and do not copy it as proven genealogy. > > > >ps to Tressie et al, > > > >Who were Joseph b 1779? m Nancy's children? I have some > >more loose data I would like to connect. > > > >Thanks, > > > >J R > >--------------F5DC64FB6D7A2CEAA8F48FC8 > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="William" > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >Content-Disposition: inline; filename="William" > > > >1-- William Hamrick-243 (1784-1812) ,Greene,GA > > sp-Name Missing-775 ( - ) > > 2-- Benjamin Hamrick-774 (1800- ) ,,TN > > sp-Benetta Missing-777 (1802- ) ,,NC > > 3-- William H Hamrick-737 (1818- ) ,,AL > > sp-Martha Missing-778 (1827- ) ,,AL > > 3-- Joseph Hamrick-779 (1825- ) ,,AL > > sp-Catherine Missing-780 (1826- ) ,,AL > > 4-- William Hamrick-781 (1846- ) ,,MS > > 4-- Benjamin Hamrick-782 (1847- ) ,,MS > > 4-- Joseph Hamrick-783 (1848- ) ,,MS > > 3-- Mary Hamrick-776 (1830- ) ,,AL > > 3-- Andrew Hamrick-772 (1832- ) ,,AL > > 3-- John (Jack) Hamrick-736 (1835- ) ,,Al > > sp-Nancy J Little-738 (1834- ) ,,MS > > 4-- William Hamrick-739 (1869- ) > > 4-- James Little Hamrick-740 (1871-1928) > Durant,Holmes,MS > > sp-Claudia Leslie Moore-751 (1876- ) > Lufkin,Angelina,TX > > 5-- James Howard Hamrick-752 (1895-1960) > > sp-Leona Missing-753 (1896- ) > > 5-- George E (Bud) Hamrick-754 (1899- ) > > 5-- Wesley Jackson Hamrick-755 (1901-1980) > Houston,Harris,TX > > sp-Jessie Marguerite Hall-757 (1901-1983) > Waco,McLennam,TX > > 5-- Cornelius Kyle Hamrick-756 (1905-1993) > Houston,Harris,TX > > sp-Margaret Missing-758 ( - ) > > 5-- Lucille (Dolly) Hamrick-759 (1907-1982) > > sp-Peyton Barbee-760 ( - ) > > sp-Name Delaney-761 ( - ) > > 5-- Raymond Hamrick-762 ( -1963) > > sp-Myrtle Missing-763 ( - ) > > 5-- Louise Hamrick-764 ( - ) > > 5-- Estell Hamrick-765 ( - ) > > 4-- Hattie S Hamrick-741 (1875- ) Durant,Holmes,MS > > sp-James Barrington-750 ( - ) > > 4-- Hudson Hamrick-742 (1877- ) Durant,Holmes,MS > > sp-Mattie Smith-749 (1883- ) ,,MS > > 5-- Lonnie Hamrick-766 (1900- ) ,,MS > > 5-- Gladys Hamrick-767 (1903- ) ,,MS > > 5-- Marie Hamrick-768 (1905- ) ,,TX > > 5-- Louise Hamrick-769 (1908- ) ,,TX > > 5-- Howard Denman Hamrick-770 ( - ) > > 4-- Need Hamrick-743 ( - ) > > sp-Thomas Heffner-748 ( - ) > > 4-- John Hamrick-744 ( - ) > > sp-Name Miller-747 ( - ) > > 4-- Angie Hamrick-745 ( - ) > > sp-George Tierce-746 ( - ) > > 3-- Margaret Hamrick-771 (1837- ) ,,AL > > 3-- Eliza Hamrick-734 (1837- ) ,,AL > > 3-- Hannah Hamrick-733 (1841- ) ,,MS > > 3-- Ann Hamrick-773 (1842- ) ,,MS > > 3-- Benjamin Hamrick-735 (1846- ) ,,MS > > > >??? 2-- Berrell Hampton Hamrick (1810- ) ,,AL > > > >--------------F5DC64FB6D7A2CEAA8F48FC8-- > > Kathy, I am a descendent of the George B. Hambrick and Burrel Hambrick of Van Zandt County, TX. I know that George B. was in the Civil War and is buried at Confederate Mound in Woodlawn Cemetery in Chicago. What is the source for his military service? Also Burrel purchased land in Tallapposa County, AL and that record states he is " of De Kalb County GA". Also what is the source for Burrell's middle name of Hampton? All I have ever seen is the initial "H". Looking forward to your reply, Ike Porter [email protected]