Hi Trish, Glad that they were the right Hunts, I have looked for the Hannah and Ann but I couldn't find them, if they are using Hampshire and not Andover its a bit difficult. But they should have been on the 1851. I am going to Winchester Archives sometime in April, this is where the Andover collection is. I can look on the parish registers as they are on microfiche and wont take very long. Best wishes Val -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Trish Sent: 19 March 2008 08:40 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [HAM] Hunt - Val Hi Val your a star :) No wonder I couldn't find them. Thank you very much, now I need to wonder who Hannah and Ann are. Have ordered cert for Henrys birth so will now wait. Again thank you very very much :) Trish Pingelly West Aust > > Hi Trish, > I found the right Hunts there are showing just the initial of there name > no > wonder they are a bit elusive. On the 1851 on Ancestry if you put in Hunt > and Andover they all pop up. On the 1841 there is only the Hannah and Ann. > Image sent off list > Best wishes Val > > For FREE online parish register transcriptions visit the Hampshire OPC at www.knightroots.co.uk ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date: 18/03/2008 08:10

I have several Keturah Paynes (or Pains) in my Hampshire line in Christchurch late 1700s and early 1800s. One seems to be my 4g-grandfather's sister, another is his daughter and another his niece. Also another of that name yet to be connected. I note that the Keturah Payne name also occurs frequently in USA families. Is there something about the combination of Keturah (not a common first name) and Payne that I'm not aware of !! Any suggestions most welcome. Regards Francis Payne Auckland, New Zealand