RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. Re: [GREATWAR] Re MIC : 2 different men in different regiments with the same Army number.
    2. Peter Fellowes
    3. Greetings all, It was not uncommon for soldiers to have the same regimental number as some Regiments had their own numbering system prior to the introduction of Conscription and a 'Centralised numbering system' [to me at least a mine field in its own right]. SWD CD for example shows six soldiers with the number 20996 Regards Peter Fellowes ----- Original Message ----- From: "patrick holland" <lambeth@it.net.au> To: <greatwar@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:45 AM Subject: [GREATWAR] Re MIC : 2 different men in different regiments with the same Army number. > > I was given the following information from a soldier's record book : Pte > Charles Holland. RASC, Army number 20996. > > When I did a search for his MIC to my surprise I found an entry for a > Pte. Charles Robinson. Northumberland Fusiliers, Army number 20996. > > Is this a mistake or is there some other explanation. > > Regards. > > Patrick Holland > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GREATWAR-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    02/01/2007 03:55:08
    1. Re: [GREATWAR] Re MIC : 2 different men in different regiments withthe same Army number.
    2. Peter Gower
    3. There were ten men numbered 604 in the Canadian Expeditionary Force. For a winter's diversion, can anybody beat that? Peter

    02/01/2007 01:34:48
    1. Re: [GREATWAR] Re MIC : 2 different men in different regiments with the same Army number.
    2. patrick holland
    3. Peter, Many thanks for your explanation. Regards. Patrick Peter Fellowes wrote: > Greetings all, > It was not uncommon for soldiers to have the same regimental number as some > Regiments had their own numbering system prior to the introduction of > Conscription and a 'Centralised numbering system' [to me at least a mine > field in its own right]. > > SWD CD for example shows six soldiers with the number 20996 > > Regards > Peter Fellowes > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "patrick holland" <lambeth@it.net.au> > To: <greatwar@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 10:45 AM > Subject: [GREATWAR] Re MIC : 2 different men in different regiments with the > same Army number. > > > >> I was given the following information from a soldier's record book : Pte >> Charles Holland. RASC, Army number 20996. >> >> When I did a search for his MIC to my surprise I found an entry for a >> Pte. Charles Robinson. Northumberland Fusiliers, Army number 20996. >> >> Is this a mistake or is there some other explanation. >> >> Regards. >> >> Patrick Holland >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> GREATWAR-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GREATWAR-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

    02/01/2007 02:01:51