Hi Janet, Your caveat sounds about right for a number of families as such as there are bound to be links within some families that can not be confirmed beyond doubt, sometimes one has to run with limited information that is not conclusive. David J Grimshaw (or is it Grimason?) Genealogical Researcher of the "Grimason" surname and variations of the "Grimason" surname World Wide. A One Name study registered with the Guild of One Name Studies (GOONS): 6138 formally 2962 The "Sherlock Holmes" of this family according to some. On 4/01/2015 5:51 a.m., JANETHESKI via wrote: > There is a distinct problem with my part of the HESKINS family tree, which > also affects most of the other members of the family. There are doubts as > to how the family arrived in an area of Gloucestershire close to the area > where there had been a definite family line, which petered out at about the > same time. There is an established Christian name that occurs in both parts > of the line either side of about 1715. > > There are trees on Ancestry that have no doubt as to the connection but I > would like more evidence. Should I publish the tree it would, as Colin > Stevenson suggests, require a caveat to the effect that the connection is the > best possible. There are no other possibilities that have been found. > Therefore it is highly likely to be correct....but I still have doubts. > > Happy New year, > > Janet Heskins [2281] > >