Hi Corinne The most likely explanation would be tuberculosis. This was commonly passed on to other members of a family. Two of my great-grandfather's brothers died of it, aged 25 and 23, within the space of a few months. This was in the 1890s, but it remained a killer until the 1940s. June Willing Guild of One-Name Studies member no 2117 Willing/Willings One-Name Study http://one-name.org/name_profile/Willing/ Willing/Willings DNA Project http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Willing/ Dominicus One-Name Study http://one-name.org/name_profile/dominicus-2/ On 29 Dec 2014, at 22:05, Corinne Curtis via wrote: > I've just come across something unusual in four siblings (teenage to > early 20's) dying in succession over a period of about 3 years, as > follows: > > Thomas travels from Camperdown, Victoria, Australia, to Rome (studying > for the priesthood), returns ill in 1932, and dies Jun 1936, aged 28. > His sister Norah dies April 1937 aged 19. > Another sister Patricia dies Jan 1938 aged 21. > Another sister Margaret dies Sep 1939 aged 17. > >> From the sequence of deaths, my theory is that Thomas brought back > some kind of contagious illness from Rome, and then passed it on to > his sisters. Thomas was said to have been ill for about 5 years, and > was sick enough to return to Australia four years before his death. > > I know the only way to conclusively find out would be to obtain death > certificates, but does anyone have any theories on what might have > killed them? > > Corinne Curtis > #5579 > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

I've just come across something unusual in four siblings (teenage to early 20's) dying in succession over a period of about 3 years, as follows: Thomas travels from Camperdown, Victoria, Australia, to Rome (studying for the priesthood), returns ill in 1932, and dies Jun 1936, aged 28. His sister Norah dies April 1937 aged 19. Another sister Patricia dies Jan 1938 aged 21. Another sister Margaret dies Sep 1939 aged 17. >From the sequence of deaths, my theory is that Thomas brought back some kind of contagious illness from Rome, and then passed it on to his sisters. Thomas was said to have been ill for about 5 years, and was sick enough to return to Australia four years before his death. I know the only way to conclusively find out would be to obtain death certificates, but does anyone have any theories on what might have killed them? Corinne Curtis #5579

I am researching a branch of my family that seems to come from the Lichfield area particularly Longdon. The person I am looking for is a JOHN RICHARD GRIMMITT  a carpenter . I can find his marriage to Ann Gorton in 1788 and his death in 1839. His bpt according to the web is 1752c and a suggestion of Stratford on Avon. Does anyone have acces to S-O-A records for a quick look for me please. Many thanks Shirley Power GRIMMETT 6171

Have you seen the wikitree profiles for this family? http://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Grimason-4 The profile for Samuel J Grimason suggests he emigrated in 1905 under the alias Samuel Jones, so that may be another lead to follow. I presume you have seen the image of the birth record that shows father Samuel Grimason and mother Lily McKinley,fathers address 270 Westmoreland Av and occupation grocer. Corinne Curtis#5579

David The birth registration says that the child's parents are Samuel Grimason and Lily McKinley and gives Samuel's occupation as a grocer but have you checked the second page of the border crossing manifest? He is identified as a 'Procurer' and she as a 'Prostitute'!. That and the border crossing card give his alias as Jones and hers as Johnson. Maybe they just abandoned the child or the child was taken into care if she was arrested. In any case, there was a Samuel and Lily Grimason living in Regina, Saskatchewan at the time of the 1916 census and in Winnipeg in the 1921 census - both instances with no children so something must have happened to him. John Carey (GOONS 6565) -----Original Message----- From: goons-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:goons-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Sherlock Holmes via Sent: December-29-14 10:37 AM To: goons@rootsweb.com Subject: [G] Possible Adoption Hi, I have a person in my database that I suspect may have been adopted out in Canada. The reason that I suspect that the individual may have been adopted out is that his parents tried crossing the border at Buffalo Creek, New York, USA in November 1910 and were turned back, there is no mention of their child yet that child ought to have been two years old at that time, the couple were not married and in a relationship that would have been deemed not legal in England as the father was still married and his proper wife was still alive in England. What is known is the birth full name of the individual and the birth date as follows; John McKinley GRIMASON Born: 30 August 1908 Place of Birth: York, Yorkville, Canada. I have not been able to find any death for this individual either hence the reason I suspect that he may have been adopted out. Question I have is, is there away of finding out if this individual was adopted out and what their Name became as i would like to be able to trace this one forward if possible. Please help if you can, thanks in advance. regards, David J Grimshaw (or is it Grimason?) Genealogical Researcher of the "Grimason" surname and variations of the "Grimason" surname World Wide. A One Name study registered with the Guild of One Name Studies (GOONS): 6138 formally 2962 The "Sherlock Holmes" of this family according to some _____________________________________________ RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Sherlock Have you considered that the child is theirs, born illegitimately? You don't give his parents' names so I assume he is GRIMASON. Is it possible that her name was McKINLEY? And is it possible John reverted to McKINLEY subsequently? Regards David Burgess On 29/12/14 15:37, Sherlock Holmes via wrote: > > Hi, > I have a person in my database that I suspect may have been adopted out > in Canada. > The reason that I suspect that the individual may have been adopted out > is that his parents tried crossing the border at Buffalo Creek, New > York, USA in November 1910 and were turned back, there is no mention of > their child yet that child ought to have been two years old at that > time, the couple were not married and in a relationship that would have > been deemed not legal in England as the father was still married and his > proper wife was still alive in England. > What is known is the birth full name of the individual and the birth > date as follows; > John McKinley GRIMASON > Born: 30 August 1908 > Place of Birth: York, Yorkville, Canada. > > I have not been able to find any death for this individual either hence > the reason I suspect that he may have been adopted out. > Question I have is, is there away of finding out if this individual was > adopted out and what their Name became as i would like to be able to > trace this one forward if possible. > Please help if you can, thanks in advance. > > regards, > David J Grimshaw (or is it Grimason?) > Genealogical Researcher of the "Grimason" surname and variations of the "Grimason" surname World Wide. > A One Name study registered with the Guild of One Name Studies (GOONS): 6138 formally 2962 > The "Sherlock Holmes" of this family according to some > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- David Burgess

Hi, If this will service is the one I think it is, there is no index. You can search the database, however you need to know the year of the probate, that or do the search year by year and note what hits you get for each variant of your One Name Study. I take it this is the site you are referring to https://probatesearch.service.gov.uk/#wills Regards, David J Grimshaw (or is it Grimason?) Genealogical Researcher of the "Grimason" surname and variations of the "Grimason" surname World Wide. A One Name study registered with the Guild of One Name Studies (GOONS): 6138 formally 2962 The "Sherlock Holmes" of this family according to some On 29/12/2014 7:39 a.m., Polly Rubery via wrote: > Hi John > > The National Probate Index on Ancestry covers the years 1858-1966; this > index, which is free to search covers the years 1858 to date. So you can > extend the information for your ONS (and other FH interests) very easily and > for free on this site. Up until 1996 the returned results are in the form > of scanned pages from the printed volumes, just like those on Ancestry, > although sadly the latter ones carry less information than the earlier ones. > > The £10 is the fee required to obtain the will and grant (do not forget to > order the latter as it sometimes gives further information), or letters of > administration. > > This has been the standard fee for some time now, but instead of having to > print off a form and send it the Leeds DPR by post with a cheque, you can > now order and pay online and within a short time you will be sent an email > with a link in it to your requested will, which stays active for 30 days and > allows you to save the file to your computer. > > As others have noticed, the pribted volumes are arranged by year of probate > and the modern ones (post 1996) are arranged by date of death, so if someone > died before 1996 but the estate was not probated until after that date it > seems that the will does not appear in this index. However I haven't > actually had a chance to check this for myself, so I cannot say for sure. > Hope that answers your query > Polly > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Commins via" <goons@rootsweb.com> > To: <GOONS@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 3:07 PM > Subject: [G] Wills > > > do the government will service at £10 contain any more than the will > index on Ancestry, > John > > _____________________________________________ >

Sue: That's extremely kind of you. I'm most grateful. The marriage was: William BANSGROVE and Ann BENNETT at St Thomas a Becket, Pagham, Sussex on 12 February 1813. It was by Licence, and I have a transcription of this. Pagham & Tarring Peculiar, Sussex (Sussex Marriage Index). Marriage Licence. William BANSGROVE (bach, 21, pte 57th Foot Regiment) & Ann BENNETT (spin, 17, with consent of father, John BENNETT). Sponsors: William BANSGROVE, John BENNETT. (11 Feb). So it seems that William's signature may also be on the licence allegation. But if West Sussex is anything like other record offices I've visited, checking the licence for the signature will be more troublesome than just looking up the marriage. Thanks again Paul On 29 December 2014 at 08:45, Sue <suefp@btinternet.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > I'm close to West Sussex Record Office in Chichester, so happy to see what I can find for you next time I'm in, which will probably be 5th Jan. > > Sue > 6000 researching Pascall > > Sent from my iPad >

You take pot luck on the content. It could be anything from leaving the lot to a cat's home to naming a complete family with addresses etc. The one I got even included bequests to the church where the deceased had married his wife and named the spouses of children plus grandchildren, with addresses. Adrian

Hi Peter / Nicola, An how do we determine that we may/may not have a Quaker marriage? Kind regards, Andrew On 29 December 2014 at 02:47, Peter Copsey via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > On behalf of Nicola Waterfall I am announcing her Marriage Challenge for > Quaker Marriages in England & Wales for the period from 1837 to the mid > 20th > Century. > > Nicola has very kindly volunteered to search the Quaker Digests which are > on > microfiche and indexed alphabetically. The information in the digests > gives > information similar to marriage certificates, with addresses, occupations, > fathers’ names etc. > > If you think it possible that you have Quaker marriages amongst your > registered Name please send Nicola your Name. The more info you have the > better. > > Nicola intends to start with A to D and see how it goes. > > Deadline for sending Nicola your Name is 1st March. Please send to Nicola > at waterfall@one-name.org > > Wishing everyone all the best for 2015. > Peter Copsey > Marriage Challenge Co-ordinator > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message -- Web: http://www.kempfamilyhistory.com Email: kemp.andrew@gmail.com

Hi Paul, I'm close to West Sussex Record Office in Chichester, so happy to see what I can find for you next time I'm in, which will probably be 5th Jan. Sue 6000 researching Pascall Sent from my iPad > On 28 Dec 2014, at 22:51, Paul Prescott <paulgprescott@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Thanks to Rose and June for their replies. Unfortunately, my location > in Scotland (which I neglected to mention) makes a personal visit to > Chichester rather unlikely, so I shall either have to contact the > record office as June describes or find some kind soul who is heading > that way. > > Thanks again, and season's greetings > > Paul > > > > >> On 28 December 2014 at 11:36, June Willing via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: >> Hi Paul >> >> As Rose says, the registers are at the West Sussex RO at Chichester. >> >> I have found that most record offices are willing to supply a >> photocopy/printout of an entry on fiche or film by post. >> >> If I were you I would write or e-mail them asking whether they will do >> this and what they charge. If there is more than one register you >> would need to specify that you want the one with the original >> signature. You will generally be asked to send them a cheque. >> >> Durham RO supplied a copy of an entry in 2011 for £3.00 including >> postage. >> >> Canterbury Cathedral Archives supplied a copy of an entry in 2011 for >> £7.50, which was £7.00 for 15 minutes time (the minimum) plus 50p for >> the printout. This included postage. >> >> I hope this helps. >> >> June Willing >> Guild of One-Name Studies member no 2117 >> Willing/Willings One-Name Study >> http://one-name.org/name_profile/Willing/ >> Willing/Willings DNA Project >> http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Willing/ >> Dominicus One-Name Study >> http://one-name.org/name_profile/dominicus-2/ >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 28 Dec 2014, at 11:17, Rose Norton via wrote: >>> >>> Hi Paul >>> >>> I would suggest visiting the local archive to Pagham (possibly >>> Chichester), >>> see if its on microfiche and print a copy of the page. I have done >>> that with >>> several of my tree. It if isn't on microfiche the archive should >>> have the >>> original registers. Aylesbury charges for taking photos but its still >>> cheaper than getting a copy from the RD and you are getting a copy >>> of the >>> original parish entry. >>> >>> Rose Norton >>> Bierton 6008 >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Paul Prescott via >>> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 6:29 PM >>> To: GOONS mailing list >>> Subject: [G] Original Sussex parish register >>> >>> Hi: >>> >>> William BANSGROVE married Ann BENNETT at St Thomas a Becket, Pagham, >>> Sussex on 12 February 1813. Family Search has two entries for this >>> marriage, and through their photoduplication service (now sadly >>> discontinued) I have obtained a copy. >>> >>> However what I have is just that - a copy, probably made by the vicar >>> of the time. But what I'd like is a photocopy of the original entry, >>> so that I can compare William's signature with that of a William on >>> another marriage and see if they are one and the same person. >>> >>> So does anyone know, please, how I can get a copy of the original >>> marriage record, complete with original signatures, for Pagham in >>> 1813? >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> Paul >>> _____________________________________________ >>> >>> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc >>> http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >>> quotes in >>> the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> _____________________________________________ >>> >>> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com >>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >>> the body of the message >> >> >> _____________________________________________ >> >> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

On 28/12/2014 23:34, Paul Howes via wrote: > Can anyone help one of my co-workers with a small issue we are finding > with FMP and the 1911 UK census, please? > > If I recall correctly, it used to be possible to switch the FMP view > to look at the front page of the household return to check the > address. This was especially useful where the person was an inmate or > patient, because the name of the institution would be revealed. > > Now, unless I'm missing something, FMP only transcribes the address, > eg, Hammersmith Road, but not the name of the institution, and I > cannot find a way to get to the institution name. Fortunately, > Ancestry often does transcribe the name of the institution, eg, West > London Hospital, and since I have an Ancestry subscription I can often > look it up. > > Am I indeed missing something about FMP? Can my co-worker answer his > own questions?! TIA for any help and HNY to all. > Paul > When you view the page image (not the transcription) you will now find a tab for "related images" in the bottom right hand corner. This brings up a menu from which you can choose the "address" page of the Schedule which should give you what you are looking for. Chris Pitt Lewis --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com

Thanks to Rose and June for their replies. Unfortunately, my location in Scotland (which I neglected to mention) makes a personal visit to Chichester rather unlikely, so I shall either have to contact the record office as June describes or find some kind soul who is heading that way. Thanks again, and season's greetings Paul On 28 December 2014 at 11:36, June Willing via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Hi Paul > > As Rose says, the registers are at the West Sussex RO at Chichester. > > I have found that most record offices are willing to supply a > photocopy/printout of an entry on fiche or film by post. > > If I were you I would write or e-mail them asking whether they will do > this and what they charge. If there is more than one register you > would need to specify that you want the one with the original > signature. You will generally be asked to send them a cheque. > > Durham RO supplied a copy of an entry in 2011 for £3.00 including > postage. > > Canterbury Cathedral Archives supplied a copy of an entry in 2011 for > £7.50, which was £7.00 for 15 minutes time (the minimum) plus 50p for > the printout. This included postage. > > I hope this helps. > > June Willing > Guild of One-Name Studies member no 2117 > Willing/Willings One-Name Study > http://one-name.org/name_profile/Willing/ > Willing/Willings DNA Project > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Willing/ > Dominicus One-Name Study > http://one-name.org/name_profile/dominicus-2/ > > > > > > On 28 Dec 2014, at 11:17, Rose Norton via wrote: > >> Hi Paul >> >> I would suggest visiting the local archive to Pagham (possibly >> Chichester), >> see if its on microfiche and print a copy of the page. I have done >> that with >> several of my tree. It if isn't on microfiche the archive should >> have the >> original registers. Aylesbury charges for taking photos but its still >> cheaper than getting a copy from the RD and you are getting a copy >> of the >> original parish entry. >> >> Rose Norton >> Bierton 6008 >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Prescott via >> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 6:29 PM >> To: GOONS mailing list >> Subject: [G] Original Sussex parish register >> >> Hi: >> >> William BANSGROVE married Ann BENNETT at St Thomas a Becket, Pagham, >> Sussex on 12 February 1813. Family Search has two entries for this >> marriage, and through their photoduplication service (now sadly >> discontinued) I have obtained a copy. >> >> However what I have is just that - a copy, probably made by the vicar >> of the time. But what I'd like is a photocopy of the original entry, >> so that I can compare William's signature with that of a William on >> another marriage and see if they are one and the same person. >> >> So does anyone know, please, how I can get a copy of the original >> marriage record, complete with original signatures, for Pagham in >> 1813? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Paul >> _____________________________________________ >> >> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc >> http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> _____________________________________________ >> >> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com >> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and >> the body of the message > > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Perfect! Thank you very much, Chris Paul On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Chris Pitt Lewis via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > On 28/12/2014 23:34, Paul Howes via wrote: >> Can anyone help one of my co-workers with a small issue we are finding >> with FMP and the 1911 UK census, please? >> >> If I recall correctly, it used to be possible to switch the FMP view >> to look at the front page of the household return to check the >> address. This was especially useful where the person was an inmate or >> patient, because the name of the institution would be revealed. >> >> Now, unless I'm missing something, FMP only transcribes the address, >> eg, Hammersmith Road, but not the name of the institution, and I >> cannot find a way to get to the institution name. Fortunately, >> Ancestry often does transcribe the name of the institution, eg, West >> London Hospital, and since I have an Ancestry subscription I can often >> look it up. >> >> Am I indeed missing something about FMP? Can my co-worker answer his >> own questions?! TIA for any help and HNY to all. >> Paul >> > > When you view the page image (not the transcription) you will now find a > tab for "related images" in the bottom right hand corner. This brings up > a menu from which you can choose the "address" page of the Schedule > which should give you what you are looking for. > > Chris Pitt Lewis > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- Paul Howes www.howesfamilies.com Researching House, Howes, Hows, Howse & Howze worldwide

Hi John The National Probate Index on Ancestry covers the years 1858-1966; this index, which is free to search covers the years 1858 to date. So you can extend the information for your ONS (and other FH interests) very easily and for free on this site. Up until 1996 the returned results are in the form of scanned pages from the printed volumes, just like those on Ancestry, although sadly the latter ones carry less information than the earlier ones. The £10 is the fee required to obtain the will and grant (do not forget to order the latter as it sometimes gives further information), or letters of administration. This has been the standard fee for some time now, but instead of having to print off a form and send it the Leeds DPR by post with a cheque, you can now order and pay online and within a short time you will be sent an email with a link in it to your requested will, which stays active for 30 days and allows you to save the file to your computer. As others have noticed, the pribted volumes are arranged by year of probate and the modern ones (post 1996) are arranged by date of death, so if someone died before 1996 but the estate was not probated until after that date it seems that the will does not appear in this index. However I haven't actually had a chance to check this for myself, so I cannot say for sure. Hope that answers your query Polly ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Commins via" <goons@rootsweb.com> To: <GOONS@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 3:07 PM Subject: [G] Wills do the government will service at £10 contain any more than the will index on Ancestry, John _____________________________________________ RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Can anyone help one of my co-workers with a small issue we are finding with FMP and the 1911 UK census, please? If I recall correctly, it used to be possible to switch the FMP view to look at the front page of the household return to check the address. This was especially useful where the person was an inmate or patient, because the name of the institution would be revealed. Now, unless I'm missing something, FMP only transcribes the address, eg, Hammersmith Road, but not the name of the institution, and I cannot find a way to get to the institution name. Fortunately, Ancestry often does transcribe the name of the institution, eg, West London Hospital, and since I have an Ancestry subscription I can often look it up. Am I indeed missing something about FMP? Can my co-worker answer his own questions?! TIA for any help and HNY to all. Paul -- Paul Howes www.howesfamilies.com Researching House, Howes, Hows, Howse & Howze worldwide

The last time I ordered a will from the Probate Office in Leeds by snail mail it costs £10; this was about 6 weeks ago. Fiona — 5538 - Duignan & variants On 28 Dec 2014, at 15:07, John Commins via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > do the government will service at £10 contain any more than the will > index on Ancestry, > John > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hello everyone, On behalf of Nicola Waterfall I am announcing her Marriage Challenge for Quaker Marriages in England & Wales for the period from 1837 to the mid 20th Century. Nicola has very kindly volunteered to search the Quaker Digests which are on microfiche and indexed alphabetically. The information in the digests gives information similar to marriage certificates, with addresses, occupations, fathers’ names etc. If you think it possible that you have Quaker marriages amongst your registered Name please send Nicola your Name. The more info you have the better. Nicola intends to start with A to D and see how it goes. Deadline for sending Nicola your Name is 1st March. Please send to Nicola at waterfall@one-name.org Wishing everyone all the best for 2015. Peter Copsey Marriage Challenge Co-ordinator

Hi John For £10 you get a copy of the will. Almost every will certainly has more information than the index entry. June Willing Guild of One-Name Studies member no 2117 Willing/Willings One-Name Study http://one-name.org/name_profile/Willing/ Willing/Willings DNA Project http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Willing/ Dominicus One-Name Study http://one-name.org/name_profile/dominicus-2/ On 28 Dec 2014, at 15:07, John Commins via wrote: > do the government will service at £10 contain any more than the will > index on Ancestry, > John > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

do the government will service at £10 contain any more than the will index on Ancestry, John