Hi I am now aware of the online announcements, so will not be needing further help with this Thanks Member for the Guild of One Name Studies ( Goons) 3922 Researching the surname Liddiard & variants world wide

Hi Geoff Sorry yes it is there, I am in Oz so it is already the 5th Its definitely the 6th Thank you Karen Rogers -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Chew [mailto:geoffchew1@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, 5 January 2015 7:46 AM To: Karen Rogers; GOONS Subject: Re: [G] Help with a family death notice Tomorrow's the 5th. Tomorrow, then, or the day after? Geoff On 4 January 2015 at 20:21, Karen Rogers via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Hi > > > > I have just received word that a relative of mine passed away in > London on the 30th of December. His death notice will appear in the > Daily Telegraph tomorrow the 6th of January, the day of the funeral. > > I was hoping someone could scan a copy of it for me. I would greatly > appreciate this as regretfully I cannot attend the funeral in London. > Barry and I worked together on our own family tree since 1999, I will > miss our collaboration and our dinner's together whenever I was in England. > > > > His name is Barry Liddiard. > > > > Regards > > > > Karen Rogers > > Member for the Guild of One Name Studies ( Goons) 3922 > > Researching the surname Liddiard & variants world wide > > > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- Geoff Chew geoffchew1@gmail.com

Hi I have just received word that a relative of mine passed away in London on the 30th of December. His death notice will appear in the Daily Telegraph tomorrow the 6th of January, the day of the funeral. I was hoping someone could scan a copy of it for me. I would greatly appreciate this as regretfully I cannot attend the funeral in London. Barry and I worked together on our own family tree since 1999, I will miss our collaboration and our dinner's together whenever I was in England. His name is Barry Liddiard. Regards Karen Rogers Member for the Guild of One Name Studies ( Goons) 3922 Researching the surname Liddiard & variants world wide

>From family records, I have a family Hermann Peplow b. 1869 Hamburg married to Dorothy Gammelin b 1867 with three children Martha Christine b 1903 - Hermann and Heather - all supposedly from Hamburg. Does anyone know anything about this family or can suggest a good source of Hamburg records. Family Search doesn't seem to have many for this period. This group would appear to be part of the Rugen Peplows but without finding another generation or two back, I can't be sure Marie (GOONS 5318) Bringing the world together one surname at a time. 'A Pepler Name' http://pepler.tribalpages.com 'Hedgerow - the Ancestors' http://cranberry.tribalpages.com Pepler DNA Study http://www.familytreedna.com/public/pepler-ow/ 'Scroops, Scropes and Scroopes' http://dentonlk.tribalpages.com

Hi John, I would investigate the marriage of Fred Jennings and Mary Ann Rhodes in the second quarter of 1905 in Wakefield district, since it is in the right area and around the right time. She could have been a widow. Debbie Gomersall Member 808 Gomersall - Gummerson -----Original Message----- From: goons-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:goons-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of John P Laws via Sent: 04 January 2015 18:42 To: 'GOONS' Subject: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage Hi One-Namers everywhere I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary Ann DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in Easingwold North Riding. Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the Mayor of Wakefield). Walter was my late father-in-law. Can anyone throw any light on these folk. John P Laws Registrar Laws Family Register Putting Flesh on the Bones of History wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com _____________________________________________ RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Merryl Thanks for your input, I failed to mention Fred & Mary Ann appear on the 1911 census at 11 Barkers Buildings, Bottom Boat, Stanley WRY and their ages indicate the are contempories (is that the right word?) husband and wife NOT mother & Son. Searched for her in 1901 and 1881 & 1891 both in Stanley & at Easingwold, where there certainly were DAKERs in the area, without success, and I did visit Easingwold to some distant relation with my wife & her late mother in the early years in my marriage. John -----Original Message----- From: Merryl Wells [mailto:merryl.wells@ntlworld.com] Sent: 04 January 2015 22:59 To: John P Laws; goons@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage Hi, I've had a look on FreeBMD 1900 to 1911 without success, including that Fred could be Alfred or Fred a second name and looking for a Mary Dak*/Dac*. All I can think of is that Dacre/Daker could be her maiden surname but that she married and was widowed by the time she married Fred. Do you have her on 1901 census as Daker/Dacre, single and 1911 as Jennings with Fred, married? Looking at the spelling of Daker there may have only been one or two 'Mary's during my search period, more 'Mary' Dakers. Mary Dacre is more frequent. From Merryl Wells of Luton, Beds. E-Mail: merryl.wells@one-name.org GOONS Mem. No. 1757 Reg. ONS: Bawtree; Gullick/ock, Moist/Moyst. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John P Laws via" <goons@rootsweb.com> To: "'GOONS'" <goons@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 6:42 PM Subject: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage > Hi One-Namers everywhere > > > I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary > Ann > DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding > > Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in > Easingwold North Riding. > > Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 > Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, > Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the > Mayor of Wakefield). > > Walter was my late father-in-law. > > Can anyone throw any light on these folk. > > John P Laws > > Registrar > Laws Family Register > Putting Flesh on the Bones of History > > wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com > > www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks for your response Ian, (I would welcome further input on this one from other members) This is a complex family, as I understand it Fred was born 1880 Stanley and died 1946 Wortley and Mary Ann born 1880 Easingwold died Wortley 7 Apr 1960. Fred's parents were William JENNINGS (Colliery Labourer & Banksman) and Mary Ann ELLIS married 19 May 1866 Stanley, she later married Andrew DAKER 1880 he died 1920 he was formerly married to Rosetta TAYLOR. Fred & Mary Ann had three known children:- Frances (1877-1920) married William WEBBER (1872-1951) Fred (1880-1946) married Mary An DAKER (1880-1960) Walter (1885-1940) married Ada (1886-1966) I saw Mary Ann RHODES in the registers but can't link her in, Should have done this when some of them were still alive sadly I didn't join the family until 1976 Regards John P Laws -----Original Message----- From: Ian Middlebrook [mailto:ian@middlebrook.org.uk] Sent: 04 January 2015 22:09 To: John P Laws; goons@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage Hi John, Are you sure Mary Ann DAKER was Fred's wife rat1940)her than his mother (after a second marriage)? There is a family at Stanley, Yorks in 1891 with Fred (10) and Frances (13) JENNINGS, but the parents are Andrew and Mary A DAKER - also with some younger children called DAKER. I would assume Fred & Frances were children of Mary Ann from a previous marriage. Fred & Frances were with William & Mary Ann JENNINGS in 1881. I would guess Fred married Mary Ann RHODES in 1905 (Wakefield district). Best wishes, Ian Middlebrook GOONS #6498 -----Original Message----- From: John P Laws via Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 6:42 PM To: 'GOONS' Subject: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage Hi One-Namers everywhere I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary Ann DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in Easingwold North Riding. Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the Mayor of Wakefield). Walter was my late father-in-law. Can anyone throw any light on these folk. John P Laws Registrar Laws Family Register Putting Flesh on the Bones of History wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com _____________________________________________ RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi, I've had a look on FreeBMD 1900 to 1911 without success, including that Fred could be Alfred or Fred a second name and looking for a Mary Dak*/Dac*. All I can think of is that Dacre/Daker could be her maiden surname but that she married and was widowed by the time she married Fred. Do you have her on 1901 census as Daker/Dacre, single and 1911 as Jennings with Fred, married? Looking at the spelling of Daker there may have only been one or two 'Mary's during my search period, more 'Mary' Dakers. Mary Dacre is more frequent. From Merryl Wells of Luton, Beds. E-Mail: merryl.wells@one-name.org GOONS Mem. No. 1757 Reg. ONS: Bawtree; Gullick/ock, Moist/Moyst. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John P Laws via" <goons@rootsweb.com> To: "'GOONS'" <goons@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 6:42 PM Subject: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage > Hi One-Namers everywhere > > > I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary > Ann > DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding > > Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in > Easingwold North Riding. > > Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 > Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, > Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the > Mayor of Wakefield). > > Walter was my late father-in-law. > > Can anyone throw any light on these folk. > > John P Laws > > Registrar > Laws Family Register > Putting Flesh on the Bones of History > > wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com > > www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com > > > > > > > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

Hi John, Are you sure Mary Ann DAKER was Fred's wife rather than his mother (after a second marriage)? There is a family at Stanley, Yorks in 1891 with Fred (10) and Frances (13) JENNINGS, but the parents are Andrew and Mary A DAKER - also with some younger children called DAKER. I would assume Fred & Frances were children of Mary Ann from a previous marriage. Fred & Frances were with William & Mary Ann JENNINGS in 1881. I would guess Fred married Mary Ann RHODES in 1905 (Wakefield district). Best wishes, Ian Middlebrook GOONS #6498 -----Original Message----- From: John P Laws via Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 6:42 PM To: 'GOONS' Subject: [G] Can anyone find this Marriage Hi One-Namers everywhere I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary Ann DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in Easingwold North Riding. Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the Mayor of Wakefield). Walter was my late father-in-law. Can anyone throw any light on these folk. John P Laws Registrar Laws Family Register Putting Flesh on the Bones of History wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com _____________________________________________ RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Tomorrow's the 5th. Tomorrow, then, or the day after? Geoff On 4 January 2015 at 20:21, Karen Rogers via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Hi > > > > I have just received word that a relative of mine passed away in London on > the 30th of December. His death notice will appear in the Daily Telegraph > tomorrow the 6th of January, the day of the funeral. > > I was hoping someone could scan a copy of it for me. I would greatly > appreciate this as regretfully I cannot attend the funeral in London. Barry > and I worked together on our own family tree since 1999, I will miss our > collaboration and our dinner's together whenever I was in England. > > > > His name is Barry Liddiard. > > > > Regards > > > > Karen Rogers > > Member for the Guild of One Name Studies ( Goons) 3922 > > Researching the surname Liddiard & variants world wide > > > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- Geoff Chew geoffchew1@gmail.com

Hi One-Namers everywhere I'm searching so unsuccessfully for the marriage of Fred JENNINGS & Mary Ann DAKER (could be DACRE)about 1906 Yorkshire West Riding Fred JENNINGS was born 1880 Stanley West Riding and Mary Ann about 1880 in Easingwold North Riding. Fred was the brother of Frances JENNINGS who had married William WEBBER 22 Oct 1898 and on her death in 1920, adopted her baby Walter WEBBER bn 1919, Walter was brought up by Fred (Colliery Banksman) & Mary Ann (Cook to the Mayor of Wakefield). Walter was my late father-in-law. Can anyone throw any light on these folk. John P Laws Registrar Laws Family Register Putting Flesh on the Bones of History wwww.lawsfamilyregisterr.tribalpages.com www.lawsandlawes.blogspot.com

Thanks so much to everyone who has replied about publishing family trees. It has inspired me to just go for it, starting with my own family line. I have a wordpress blog (free) that I have added a couple of "pages" to, to make into a limited website. I'm not sure how far I can take it before it gets to the point where I need to pay for webhosting, but for the moment it does me. I added a new page for family trees and intend at the moment to produce basic 3-4 generation charts as .jpegs through legacy charting, and embed these into a kind of blog-type commentary. No doubt it will develop as I go. I'm a bit nervous to promote it still, but biting the bullet, I invite comments on what I have done so far, and on my blog generally. Link is in my signature. Thanks again for all the wonderful supportive advice. Corinne Curtis #5579 http://sennettfamilytree.wordpress.com/ On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Elizabeth Kipp via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I have somewhat of the same quandry publishing in my blog trees for the > Blake families. However, I have decided to do it in a limited way using > the wills and available BMD/CMB information. When I can link larger > branches together with proofs then I will do that otherwise it will just > be linked families through wills. I feel that I need to start putting > the information together that I have acquired. Injuring my back last > summer has rather put me on the sidelines for nearly six months and made > me aware that I really should do this in case I find that I can not keep > up with genealogy in the future! > > Elizabeth (Blake) Kipp BA PLCGS > Website: http://www.kipp-blake-families.ca/elizabethmain.htm > Blog: http://kippeeb.blogspot.ca/ > Guild of One Name Studies #4600 (Blake, Pincombe) > The Surname Society #1004 (Bedard, Dumoulin, Gregoire, Prevost, Blake, Pincombe, Knight, Rawlings, Cheatle, Butt, Buller, Taylor, Gray, Farmer, Lywood, Rew, Routledge, Welch, Coleman, Lambden, Arnold, Peck, Rowcliffe, Siderfin, Cobb, Beard) > > On 2015-01-03 11:33 AM, Colin Stevenson via wrote: >> It depends on why you want to publish the tree. If you claim it is the >> definitive family history you need to be very certain of your facts. At >> the other end of the spectrum if it is published as a work in progress >> with appropriate caveats then it is a useful research tool for you and >> others. Personally I think there is more to gain from 'early ' >> publication rather than striving for accuracy. I can see no harm from >> publishing a speculative tree provided it is described as such. >> >> Colin Stevenson (Cavie & Monnington) >> _____________________________________________ >> >> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 14:17:09 -0000, SHIRLEY POWER via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I am trying to put together the Wootton/ Woodstock part of my tree. > Unfortunately it says 1861 and 1871 census are missing and 20 years is a > large gap to be without information does anyone know of a solution to > this problem please. Shirley, What is 'it' in your second line? It's 'well known' that the Woodstock sub-district is missing for 1861. 1871 is not missing. If 'it' cannot help you then consider buying the images and index for Oxfordshire from the Oxfordshire FHS! ( http://www.ofhs.org.uk/CDsales.html#censebs ) Piece 1449 includes both Wootton and Woodstock. Happy New Year, Malcolm. -- Malcolm Austen <malcolm.austen@weald.org.uk> GENUKI trustee <genuki@weald.org.uk> Pedigree User Group <chairman@pugweb.org.uk> Oxfordshire FHS <webmaster@ofhs.org.uk> FFHS Communications Officer <communications@ffhs.org.uk>

Do you mean the census details from a particular area are missing? If so, it might help to know those details Nick Nick Serpell nick@serpell.org > On 4 Jan 2015, at 14:17, SHIRLEY POWER via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > Help required here please. > I am trying to put together the Wootton/ Woodstock part of my tree. Unfortunately it says 1861 and 1871 census are missing and 20 years is a large gap to be without information does anyone know of a solution to this problem please. > > Shirley Power > GRIMMETT 6171 > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

How annoying. I've just been seeking 1871 for two related London families of Hillyard and Bawtree where neither family can be found. I'd thought if I could find one, the other could be nearby, which is one idea you could try? Did any of your family get born, married or die during that period that you could at least get an address of where they might have been? A death might even give you two addresses if the informant is related but living at another address. I know the Hillyard was a coffee house keeper so thought might be in a Trade Directory but all I've found (by Googling) was a mention on the Old Bailey website that someone burgled his dwelling house, stole a coat plus 2s.6d., received 12 months hard labour, unfortunately no address or even area of London given. From Merryl Wells of Luton, Beds. E-Mail: merryl.wells@one-name.org GOONS Mem. No. 1757 Reg. ONS: Bawtree; Gullick/ock, Moist/Moyst. ----- Original Message ----- From: "SHIRLEY POWER via" <goons@rootsweb.com> To: <goons@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 2:17 PM Subject: [G] Wootton > Help required here please. > I am trying to put together the Wootton/ Woodstock part of my tree. > Unfortunately it says 1861 and 1871 census are missing and 20 years is a > large gap to be without information does anyone know of a solution to this > problem please. > > Shirley Power > GRIMMETT 6171 > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc > http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

You should see what it’s like when a whole century’s worth of census data is missing! Fiona — 5538 - Duignan & variants On 4 Jan 2015, at 14:17, SHIRLEY POWER via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Help required here please. > I am trying to put together the Wootton/ Woodstock part of my tree. Unfortunately it says 1861 and 1871 census are missing and 20 years is a large gap to be without information does anyone know of a solution to this problem please. > > Shirley Power > GRIMMETT 6171 > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Help required here please. I am trying to put together the Wootton/ Woodstock part of my tree. Unfortunately it says 1861 and 1871 census are missing and 20 years is a large gap to be without information does anyone know of a solution to this problem please. Shirley Power GRIMMETT 6171

Search engines will do lots of promotion for you! Good luck Paul On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Corinne Curtis via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Thanks so much to everyone who has replied about publishing family > trees. It has inspired me to just go for it, starting with my own > family line. I have a wordpress blog (free) that I have added a > couple of "pages" to, to make into a limited website. I'm not sure > how far I can take it before it gets to the point where I need to pay > for webhosting, but for the moment it does me. I added a new page for > family trees and intend at the moment to produce basic 3-4 generation > charts as .jpegs through legacy charting, and embed these into a kind > of blog-type commentary. No doubt it will develop as I go. I'm a bit > nervous to promote it still, but biting the bullet, I invite comments > on what I have done so far, and on my blog generally. Link is in my > signature. > > Thanks again for all the wonderful supportive advice. > > Corinne Curtis #5579 > http://sennettfamilytree.wordpress.com/ > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Elizabeth Kipp via <goons@rootsweb.com> wrote: >> I have somewhat of the same quandry publishing in my blog trees for the >> Blake families. However, I have decided to do it in a limited way using >> the wills and available BMD/CMB information. When I can link larger >> branches together with proofs then I will do that otherwise it will just >> be linked families through wills. I feel that I need to start putting >> the information together that I have acquired. Injuring my back last >> summer has rather put me on the sidelines for nearly six months and made >> me aware that I really should do this in case I find that I can not keep >> up with genealogy in the future! >> >> Elizabeth (Blake) Kipp BA PLCGS >> Website: http://www.kipp-blake-families.ca/elizabethmain.htm >> Blog: http://kippeeb.blogspot.ca/ >> Guild of One Name Studies #4600 (Blake, Pincombe) >> The Surname Society #1004 (Bedard, Dumoulin, Gregoire, Prevost, Blake, Pincombe, Knight, Rawlings, Cheatle, Butt, Buller, Taylor, Gray, Farmer, Lywood, Rew, Routledge, Welch, Coleman, Lambden, Arnold, Peck, Rowcliffe, Siderfin, Cobb, Beard) >> >> On 2015-01-03 11:33 AM, Colin Stevenson via wrote: >>> It depends on why you want to publish the tree. If you claim it is the >>> definitive family history you need to be very certain of your facts. At >>> the other end of the spectrum if it is published as a work in progress >>> with appropriate caveats then it is a useful research tool for you and >>> others. Personally I think there is more to gain from 'early ' >>> publication rather than striving for accuracy. I can see no harm from >>> publishing a speculative tree provided it is described as such. >>> >>> Colin Stevenson (Cavie & Monnington) >>> _____________________________________________ >>> >>> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >>> >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >>> >> >> _____________________________________________ >> >> RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > _____________________________________________ > > RootsWeb lists - surnames, regions, software, etc http://lists.rootsweb.ancestry.com/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GOONS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message -- Paul Howes www.howesfamilies.com Researching House, Howes, Hows, Howse & Howze worldwide

I have sent an email to dna@one-name.org but it bounced back. Is there another email address? Many thanks

Hello Kay, I sent a test message to the dna email address and received a response from Susan Meates which said " I am here. Can they try again. Susan" To ensure I was testing the right address I went to http://one-name.org/members/committee.html and clicked on the link from there. I suggest you try again. regards Gerald -----Original Message----- From: goons-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:goons-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Kay Campbell via Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2015 2:58 AM To: goons@rootsweb.com Subject: [G] DNA I have sent an email to dna@one-name.org but it bounced back. Is there another email address? Many thanks