Kay, >From what I have seen of the early newspaper article, few births were "announced" in the newspapers. Most of the births that did make it into the papers were because of unusual circumstance or because there was few other things to write about. Then, only the parents names were given or more likely the name of the father. Doris > [Original Message] > From: <Kay\"s Email" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 10/8/06 9:15:49 PM > Subject: [GEORGIA] Archives > > There are so many murders, deaths, and marriages given, but haven't seen any names of children being born in any of the time frames. I've especially looked for some in 1886-1888. Were they never mentioned? > > Kay (Fiveash) >

Thanks, Doris. I appreciate your answer. Kids were kinda unmentioned except to be farm workers, probaby. Kay (Fiveash)----- Original Message ----- From: "Doris Robbins" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:23 AM Subject: Re: [GEORGIA] Archives > Kay, > >>From what I have seen of the early newspaper article, few births were > "announced" in the newspapers. Most of the births that did make it into > the papers were because of unusual circumstance or because there was few > other things to write about. Then, only the parents names were given or > more likely the name of the father. > > Doris > > >> [Original Message] >> From: <Kay\"s Email" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Date: 10/8/06 9:15:49 PM >> Subject: [GEORGIA] Archives >> >> There are so many murders, deaths, and marriages given, but haven't seen > any names of children being born in any of the time frames. I've > especially > looked for some in 1886-1888. Were they never mentioned? >> >> Kay (Fiveash) >> > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >