In a message dated 09/01/2000 9:18:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time, dkniess@email.msn.com writes: > After checking a few couples that I had the names, but no marriage dates, I > would find one of the couple listed but when I checked the other name to see > if the info matched, there was no entry for the second spouse. So I checked > some couples that I had all the info on already and sure enough the info was > only listed under one of the spouse's names. It could be either the male or > the female. I also found an error - it gives my grandmother's dom as 11 April > 1807 when it was 1907, there again is no listing under my grandfather's name. > Thought I'd pass it on......Terry Hi Terry: I found some instances that seemed like that, too. But when I searched using the COUNTY DATE PAGE# data, it often turned out that the spouse WAS there, but the spelling would be slightly different, or the spelling would be incorrect altogether, i.e. Esletta instead of Estella (!!), or in one case the bride who had been listed in our family records for many years as Emma June Helgers turned out to be Emma Jane ODGERS and there isn't a "Helgers" in the whole database -- not male or female! So, someone in my family made a "whoooopps" a long time ago. We are all human and subject to those kinds of frailties, right? I find this a most interesting database to work with, don't you? Best wishes and happy hunting and finding, Norma Jean Herzman