OK perhaps my comment was misunderstood.... I was commenting on the person who seemed to believe that it was ANCESTRY.COM's fault that his ancestors were not on the pre 1907 birth list. I was trying to find out if anyone knew of someone that was ON that list... that list with the state index only... and was not on ANCESTRY.COM's version of the state list. It is my belief that the gentleman's ancestors were not on the index with Ancestry, because they were not on the list in the first place..... My question was Can anyone say the microfilmed pre 1907 list is more inclusive than the posted one? Iris