Would any/all of you familiar with the handwriting and boiler-plate of English documents of the 1695-1710 period PLEASE have a look at this one? One Thomas Crissop died, and this document appears in the records of the Ainsty of York. We thought he died 1701; this is in the 1700 records which began in January 1700. 4th entry down the image. I need 2nd and 3rd opinions, as my consultants here disagree. http://www.rootsweb.com/~cresap/1700/ Same document, two resolutions; 1700a is the larger but MAY not have completely uploaded; 1700b I know finished uploading properly. I do have the original tiff file, and a larger jpg but rootsweb keeps dropping the connex at just over 50% complete. Thanks! Cheryl (and feel free to pass this on to the Genbrit list) singhals <singhals@erols.com>

> Would any/all of you familiar with the handwriting and boiler-plate > of English documents of the 1695-1710 period PLEASE have a look at > this one? > > One Thomas Crissop died, and this document appears in the records of > the Ainsty of York. We thought he died 1701; this is in the 1700 > records which began in January 1700. 4th entry down the image. > > I need 2nd and 3rd opinions, as my consultants here disagree. > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~cresap/1700/ > > Same document, two resolutions; 1700a is the larger but MAY not have > completely uploaded; 1700b I know finished uploading properly. I do > have the original tiff file, and a larger jpg but rootsweb keeps > dropping the connex at just over 50% complete. > > Cheryl Singhals <singhals@erols.com> Thank you one and all. MUCH appreciated. I was expecting the widow's name to be Sarah; when I saw Eden, I asked my consultants here for help. When they declined to speculate on the Latin abbreviations, I came here. If there is someone reading who disagrees with the attempts of Renia and Matt, please contact me. Cheryl singhals <singhals@erols.com>