> But this was the pharse I had trouble with - not what you say above. > >"they have the right to be wrong if they choose to be wrong." > > To me that statement means being deliberately wrong and I disagreed > with their right to do that. That may not have been your intent but > I don't know your intent. > > [email protected] Hugh- Well, originally I did mean that two people could interpret what is fact differently--BUT...let's examine the other possibility..someone who sets out to deliberately mislead people by posting known false info in their family tree online. What can be done about it and who is to be the judge? I can't imagine why any submitter would want to do this--but even if they did I'd expect it is the responsibility of the viewer to sort out what is accurate and isn't when it comes to the user submitted data. Unless there is cause for legal action--libel, for instance, I can't see where anyone other than the people viewing the database should be judging it. And, once again, the best weapon against this would be to post the correct information in the same place the bad database is housed--let the people judge. Joan [email protected]