> > Distinguishing between what we think, or wish, and what we know > > is as important as the presentation - really, more so. > > > > Hugh <[email protected]> > > Hugh- > > We can only be responsible for information WE put in our GEDCOMs and > place online--we can't solve the problems of the world. There are > errors in books that have been there for hundreds of years and > continue to be perpetuated, and there are errors on the Internet and > there are good and bad researchers. Even good researchers make > errors in their files. We can't worry about the incorrrect > information that is out there--it has always been there and will > continue to be in the future. We can only make our own submitted > trees as accurate and complete as we can--the rest we can't really > worry about. If our info is "out there" then anyone can find it > along with the garbage files and make their own determination as to > what to believe. > > [email protected] I'm not satisfied to do that. In the interest of presenting correct information I think we have a duty to identify the incorrect. By not identifying the wrong information we help perpetuate it. I'll not be a party to that. Anyone who can determine what to believe probably doesn't need the information in the first place. Hugh [email protected] (J. Hugh Sullivan)