> Has anyone noticed lately that when looking at family trees on > Ancestry that a growing number of them do not have a contact name, > only "unknown" at the top of the page. This really makes it > difficult to identify sources, connect with the contributor or > verify that the info is correct. I for one would like to complain > about it, but not sure where to send the complaint. > > Lois Brinks-Heath <[email protected]> I've noticed. Of 21 tress I viewed yesterday only 3 had contacts. But, based on the misinformation contained it's probably better to remain unknown. Who has time to send all those people proof of how wrong they are? It's best to use any "harvested" info as a clue, nothing more. You might try repeating, "It ain't nuthin' 'til I say it is." several times. Hugh [email protected] (J. Hugh Sullivan)